ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Teaching English in a proficiency level and as a formal language to EFL learners is a big challenge in a non-English speaking country. This challenge might go on to some extent because of the curriculum in which students only learn basic rules and general English language skills in an intensive period of time. Preparatory schools of English language based universities usually have this kind of unique condensed program to improve language learners’ acquisition. However, students need more than the curriculum in order to study in their departmental studies at ease. This article demonstrates an explanation why preparatory school graduates are still weak in speaking and writing skills although they complete one year intensive language course. In this context, comparing one class of 20 civil engineering department students’ English knowledge, who have completed one year language education and started to take their most subjects in English, and 47 mixed A1 and B1 (due to CEFR) level groups of English language prep school learners’ replies to the research questions about feelings and expectations on learning English may provide healthy data to learn about learners’ needs and to improve the Preparatory School education system. In this study, civil engineering department students study departmental subjects in English, academic English and technical English, but the students of the preparatory school only learn general English.
Barrass, R. (2005). Students must write: a guide to better writing in coursework and examinations, Routledge.
Bowman R. (2011). Rethinking What Motivates and Inspires Students, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, Volume 84(6), 264-269.
Dahlstrom, E., de Boor, T., Grunwald, P., & Vockley, M. (2011). ECAR: National study of undergraduate students and information technology. Retrieved September 8, 2018, from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERS0908/ERS0908W.pdf
Furner, J. M., Yahya, N., & Duffy, M. L. (2005). Strategies to reach all students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(1), p. 16-23
Hudelson, S. (1989ab) Write On: Children Writing in ESL. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics, Washington, D.C. Pages 1 and 92.
Iflazoglu A. & Hong E. (2012) Relationships of Homework Motivation and Preferences to Homework Achievement and Attitudes in Turkish Students, Journal of Research in Childhood Education, Volume 26(1), 57-72.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Routledge
Rivers W. M. (2018). Teaching foreign language skills, University of Chicago Press.
Santeusanio, Richard P. (1991). Classroom Materials: How to Improve Your Study Skills by Marcia J. Coman and Kathy L. Heavers. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, Volume 34(8), P.673
Schlechty, Phillip C. (2002). Working on the Work: An Action Plan for Teachers, Principals, and Superintendents. The Jossey-Bass Education Series.
Tosun M. & Yildiz Y. (2015). The Role of Moral Values and Systematic Informing in Aim-Based Education. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, Volume 2(2), 40-44.
Tzotzou, M. D. (2014). Designing a Set of Procedures for the Conduct of Peer Observation in the EFL Classroom: A Collaborative Training Model towards Teacher Development. Multilingual Academic Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 2(2), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.6007/majess/v2-i2/1387
Yildiz, Y. (2017). Extracurricular Activities in the Steps of Aim-Based Education. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, Volume 4(2), 129-135.
Yildiz, Y. (2018). Social Media Addicted Students’ Failure in Learning a Foreign Language. Proceedings of the IRES International Conference, Krakow, Poland, 4th-5th October 2018, P.7-10.
In-Text Citation: (Yildiz, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Yildiz, Y. (2019). EFL Learners’ Needs in Preparatory Schools and Supplementary Techniques to Improve Their Language Proficiency. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 586–596.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode