ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The aim of this study is to examine teachers’ understanding and the level of implementation of authentic elements in their teaching of Malay language writing by focusing on the relations of the above factors (dependent variables) with three independent variables, namely school category, teachers’ experience and specialization. The research design of this study was based on a quantitative approach using a survey method. In this survey, a questionnaire was used to examine the level of implementation of authentic elements in the teaching and learning process of Malay essay writing involving Form-Two students (aged 14 years). The teacher questionnaire consisted of three parts to elicit information pertaining to teachers’ background, the level of the implementation of authentic elements in their teaching practice, and their comments and suggestions. The participants of this study were 193 teachers who were selected from 59 low-performance schools throughout Malaysia. Descriptive and correlational analyses were performed using SPSS. The analyses revealed that the overall implementation of authentic elements in the teaching process was at the moderate level. Furthermore, the relations of all variables, except teachers’ specialization, were found to be not significant. Even though the strength of the relationship between teachers’ specialization and the implementation of authentic elements in their teaching practice was found to be small, such a finding may raise some concerns among the stakeholders, notably school administrators. Clearly, teachers who are less specialized in teaching Malay language writing may need more guidance to help them use more authentic elements in their teaching practice. As such, they may require sufficient resources and support to help improve their teaching practice, the impact of which can help improve students’ learning performance.
Shaari, A. S., Yusof, A. A., Khan, J. M. K., Mei, T. S., & Teong, L. K. (2008). Keadilan Penilaian Prestasi dalam Kalangan Guru and Hubungannya dengan Motivasi Kerja and Prestasi Akademik Sekolah. International Journal of Management Studies (Bumper Issue). 15. hlm. 159-176.
Hashim, A. (2014). Panduan analisis data secara efisien. Dubook Press & Publication, Cheras, Selangor
Daniels, E. (2007). Literacy café: making writing authentic. Voices from the Middle; Mar 2007; 14, 3; ProQuest Research Library. pg. 12
Esfahandiari, M. (2014). Task-Based Writing to Improve Young Teenage Learners’ Reading Skills. World Journal of English language. 4 (1), 20-24.
Ghaderpanahi, L. (2012). Using Authentic Aural Materials to Develop Listening Comprehension in the EFL Classroom. English Language Teaching. 5 (6), 146-153.
Ghanbari, N. (2015). The Effect of Using Authentic Material on Iranian EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 5 (12), 2459-2468.
Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic Materials and Authenticity in Foreign Language Learning. Lang. Teach. Vol 40, 97-118.
Grim, F. (2010). Giving Authentic Apportunities to Second Langiage Learners. A Look at a Frech Service-Learning Project. Foreign language Annals. 43 (4), 605-623.
Guo, Shio-ching.(2012). Using Materials for Extensive Reading to Promote English Proficiency. English Language Teaching. 5(8), 196-206.
Husnin, H., Din, R., Karim, A., Norman, H., & Hamdan, A. (2013). Assesing Authentic Learning via Storyboarding: A Malaysia Perspective. Asian Social Science. 9(16), 46-53.
Herrington, A. J. & Herrington, J. A. (2007). What is an authentic learning environment?. In L. A. Tomei (Eds.), Online and Distance Learning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 68-77). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Hussain Raja M. S. (2015). Relevance of Authentic Materials to the Attention Span of Edult Learners in English Learners Classes in Pakistan. Journal of Inquiry. 13 (2)., 53-73.
Klipfel, K. M. (2014). Authentic Engagment: Assessing the Effects of Authenticity on Student Engagement and Information Literacy in Academic Library Instruction. Reference Services Review. 42 (2), 229-245.
Mousavi, S. A. & Iravani, H. (2012). The Effect of Authentic Versus Non-Authentic Aural Materials on EFL Learniers’ Listening Comprehension. English Language and Literature Studies. 2 (1), 21-27.
Muijs, D. & Reynolds, D. (2011). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice. 3rd.ed. Los Angeles. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Buyong, N. & Othman, N. (2018). Pelaksanaan Pengajaran and Pembelajaran dalam Program Sekolah dalam Hospital. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia. 43(1), 11-16.
Yusoff, R., Wah, E. S. S, Jaafar, J., & Ling, T. T. (2010). Kaedah Suapan dalam Kelas Bahasa Melayu: Satu Tinjauan Awal terhadap Pandangan Guru. Dalam Ambigapathy Pandian, Murshidi Harun @ Zakaria, Tan Hock Thye, Siti Noraini Jupri, and Noraini Ali (Eds.), Pancadimensi pengajaran and pembelajaran bahasa: Trend and amalan. Pulau Pinang: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia (hlm. 207-216).
Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Hyde, A. (2005). Best practices: Today’s standards for teaching & learning in America’s School. 3rd Edition. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Zoghi, M., Zardak, F. M., & Kazemi S. A. (2014). The Effect of Authentic Materials on Vocabulary Development. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World. 5 (4), 155-160.
Osman, Z. (2013a). Pembangunan Modul Pengajaran Bahasa Melayu secara Bersepadu. Tesis doktor falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya.
Osman, Z. (2013b). Kebolehlaksanaan and Kebolehgunaa Modul Pengajaran Bahasa Berlandaskan Pendekatan Holistik. Jurnal Pendeta, Jilid 4, 202-230.
Osman, Z. (2016). Keberkesanan Pendekatan Autentik dalam Meningkatkan Tahap Penulisan Karangan Pelajar (The Effectiveness of Authentic Approach in Increasing Student Literacy Level). Jurnal Pendeta, Jilid 7, 142-155.
In-Text Citation: (Osman, Sarudin, Abdul, & Ayob, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Osman, Z., Sarudin, A., Abdul, A. H., & Ayob, R. (2019). Teachers’ Understanding and the Level of Implementation of Authentic Elements in the Teaching of Malay Language Writing and Their Relationships with School Type, Teachers’ Experience, and Specialization. International Journal Academic Research Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 1245–1256.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode