ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
Massive Open Online Courseware (MOOC) offers a new alternative for learning and it has been widely accepted especially in many Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). This study critically reviewed MOOC acceptance and uses from the perspective of the Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2). This paper highlighted about background of MOOC, MOOC acceptance and use in HEIs, model of acceptance and use, UTAUT2 model, suggestions for future work, and conclusion. Based on the review, an interactive learning framework will be designed to support the teaching and learning processes among students and lecturers that provide an engaging and meaningful learning experience. It provides significant implications to improve and understand the acceptance and use of technology. Moreover, this study makes a significant contribution by giving suggestions for future work by using UTAUT2 with other variables and extends the theory with the integration of other latest technological advancements. Thus, indirectly the research can provide theoretical contributions in the field of education and information systems.
Admiraal, W., Huisman, B., & Pilli, O. (2015). Assessment in Massive Open Online Courses. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 207-216.
Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427-433.
Burton-Jones, A. and Hubona, G. (2006). The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 43(6), 706-717.
Chen, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., Sasselov, D., & Fredericks, C. (2019). The impact of student misconceptions on student persistence in a MOOC. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1-32.
Costa, C., Alvelos, H., & Teixeira, L. (2019). Investigating the Use and Acceptance of Technologies by Professors in a Higher Education Institution. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 9(2), 1-20.
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012(3), 18.
Davis, F. D., and Venkatesh, V. (2004). Toward Preprototype User Acceptance Testing of New Information Systems: Implications for Software Project Management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(1), 31-46.
De Waard, I., Gallagher, M. S., Zelezny-Green, R., Czerniewicz, L., Downes, S., Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Willems, J. (2014). Challenges for conceptualising EU MOOC for vulnerable learner groups. Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2014, 33-42.
Decman, M. (2015). Modeling the acceptance of e-learning in mandatory environments of higher education: The influence of previous education and gender. Computers in human behavior 49, 272-281.
Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2018). Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs. Computers & Education, 129, 48-60.
Fianu, E., Blewett, C., & Ofori, K. S. (2018). Factors affecting MOOC usage by students in selected Ghanaian Universities. Education Sciences 8(2), 70.
Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5).
Hakami, N. A. M. (2018). An Investigation of the Motivational Factors Influencing Learners’ Intentions to Continue Using Arabic MOOCs. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton, University Library.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational research review, 12, 45-58.
Hew, K. F., Qiao, C., & Tang, Y. (2018.) Understanding student engagement in large-scale open online courses: a machine learning facilitated analysis of student’s reflections in 18 highly rated MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3).
Im, I., Hong, S., & Kang, M. S. (2011). An international comparison of technology adoption testing the UTAUT model. Information & Management, 48: 1-8.
Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1).
Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 341-358.
Ketterl, M., Mertens, R., Wiesen, C., and Vornberger, O. (2011). Enabling User to User Interactions in Web Lectures with History?Aware User Awareness. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 8(4), 224–235.
Lee, Y. H., Hsiao, C., & Purnomo, S. H. (2014). An empirical examination of individual and system characteristics on enhancing e-learning acceptance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(5), 561–579.
Leong, C., & Ravichandran, P. (2017). Theoretical Framework of Learners Acceptance of MOOCs a Preliminary Report, 36, 2015–2018.
Lim, C. L., Tang, S. F., & Ravichandran, P. (2017). A Study on the Mediation Effects of Intention to Enroll in MOOCs on its Actual Usage. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-Learning, 30-33.
Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G., and Cheung, C. M. K. (2007). How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 705-737.
Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers & Education 55(2), 444-453.
Pappano, L. (2012). The Year of the MOOC. The New York Times 2 (12), 2012.
Raman, M., & Jambulingam, M. (2012). Adoption of Mobile Technology in a Learning Environment. International Conference on Emerging Trends of Computer & Information Technology (ICETCIT) – India.
Ruiperez-Valiente, J. A., Halawa, S., Slama, R., & Reich, J. (2019). Using multi-platform learning analytics to compare regional and global MOOC learning in the Arab world. Computers & Education, 103776.
Shah, D. (2017). Class Central Learner Survey (2017): MOOC users highly educated, have experienced career benefits. Class Central. Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/mooc-stats-2017
Shapiro, H. B., Lee, C. H., Roth, N. E. W., Li, K., Cetinkaya-Rundel, M., & Canelas, D. A. (2017). Understanding the massive open online course (MOOC) student experience: An examination of attitudes, motivations, and barriers. Computers & Education, 110, 35–50.
Sumak, B., Polancic, G., & Hericko, M. (2010). An empirical study of virtual learning environment adoption using UTAUT. In Mobile, Hybrid, and On-Line Learning, ELML'10. Second International Conference on hlm. 17-22.
Ulrich, C., & Nedelcu, A. (2015). MOOCs in Our University: Hopes and Worries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1541–1547.
Van-der-Heijden, H. (2004). User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704.
Vardi, M. Y. (2012). Will MOOCs destroy academia? Communications of the ACM, 55(11), 5-5.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., and Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
Xu, B., & Yang, D. (2016). Motivation classification and grade prediction for MOOCs learners. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2016, 1-4.
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M., & Jakobs, H. (2014). A Review of the state-of-the art. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - CSEDU2014, Barcelona, Spain. INSTICC, 9-20.
In-Text Citation: (Amid, & Din, 2020)
To Cite this Article: Amid, A., & Din, R. (2020). MOOCs Acceptance and Use in Higher Education Institutions through UTAUT2: An Overview. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education & Development. 9(2), 649-660.
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode