Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Gifted Students’ Knowledge and Motivation Towards Learning Chemistry: A Case Study at Pusat GENIUS@pintar Negara, Malaysia

Suganty A/ P Kanapathy

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v9-i2/7968

Open access

Nowadays, there are increasing calls for teaching and learning of STEM related field. However, learning of STEM subject, focusing on chemistry at younger age is found to be a challenge among the students. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate gifted and talented students’ knowledge and motivation towards learning chemistry subject. A total of 71 gifted and talented students, taking chemistry at the age of 12 to 13 years old at Pusat GENIUS@pintar Negara, University Kebangsaan Malaysia were involved in this study. A survey questionnaire was utilized in this study and the instrument employed was Attitude toward Chemistry Lesson Scale and Glynn’s motivation model. The collected data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 21 involving descriptive and inferential statistics. The result revealed that the students perceived chemistry playing a vital role in many aspects of everyday life. There was no significant difference in the mean of student’s knowledge and motivation towards chemistry learning scores for male and female students. The result of the study also indicates that students’ knowledge and career motivation has a moderately positive correlation with the highest correlation value. This paper is instrumental in assisting educators to enhance students’ knowledge and motivation towards chemistry learning. Therefore, the role of educators is important to bring about changes in terms of knowledge and motivation towards chemistry teaching and learning processes.

After-School Alliance. (2015). Full STEM ahead: afterschool programs step up as key partners in STEM education. Retrieved from http://afterschoolalliance.org/AA3PM/STEM.pdf
Arbona, C. (2000). The development of academic achievement in school aged children: Precursors to career development. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of Counseling Psychology (3rd ed., pp. 270–309). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Ardura, D., & Perez-Bitrian, A. (2018). The effect of motivation on the choice of chemistry in secondary schools: adaptation and validation of the Science Motivation Questionnaire II to Spanish students. Chemistry Education Research and Practices, 19(3), 905-918. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00098K
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
Blotnicky, K. A., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F., & Joy, P. (2018). A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1-15.
Broman, K., Ekborg, M., & Johnels, D. (2011). Chemistry in crisis? Perspectives on teaching and learning chemistry in Swedish upper secondary schools. Nordina, 7(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.245
Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Busolo, A. J. (2010). Gender differences in students’ achievement in chemistry in secondary schools of Kakamega district, Kenya (Master thesis, Kenyatta University Nairobi City, Kenya). Retrieved from
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3ef2/b52f0aa96547681200f7ef84363077f27f96.p
Cheung, D. (2009). Developing a scale to measure students’ attitudes toward chemistry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2185-2203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802189799
Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(2), 171-200.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.171
Dalgety, J., & Coll, R. K. (2006). The influence of first year chemistry students' learning experiences on their educational choices. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 303-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500352931
Eliasson, N., Sorensen, H., & Karlsson, K. G. (2016). Teacher–student interaction in contemporary science classrooms: is participation still a question of gender?. International Journal of Science Education, 38(16), 1655-1672.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1213457
Fairbrother, R. (2000). Strategies for learning. In M. Monk, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Good Practice in Science Teaching: What Research has to Say (pp. 7-24). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Ferrell, B., & Barbera, J. (2015). Analysis of students’ self-efficacy, interest, and effort beliefs in general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practices, 16(2), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00152D
Gambari, I. A., Gbodi, B. E., Olakanmi, E. U., & Abalaka E. N. (2016). Promoting intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among chemistry students using computer assisted instruction. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(1), 25-46.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2016.11890422
George, R. (2006). A cross-domain analysis of change in students’ attitudes toward science and attitudes about the utility of science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(1), 571-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500338755
Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2007). Non-science majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1088-1107. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20181
Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with non-science majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20267
Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and non-science majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159-1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442
Greenfield, T. A. (1996). Gender, ethnicity, science achievement, and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 901-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199610)33:8<901::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-%23
Hassan, A. A., Ali, H. I., Salum, A. A., Kassim, A. M., Elmoge, Y. N., & Amour, A. A. (2015). Factors affecting students’ performance in chemistry: Case study in Zanzibar secondary schools. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 9(11), 4055-4062. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1339632
Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education: A pedagogical justification and the state of the art in Israel, Germany, and the USA. International Journal of Science, Mathematics and Education, 9(1), 1459-1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9273-9
Jimoh, A. (2005). Perception of difficult topics in chemistry curriculum by students in Nigeria secondary schools. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 71-78.
Kinsella, S. (1998). A cross discipline study of traditional and non-traditional college students. College Student Journal, 32(4), 532-538.
Kolomuc, A., & Tekin, S. (2011). Chemistry teachers’ misconceptions concerning concept of chemical reaction rate. Eurasian Journal of Chemistry Education, 3(2), 84-101.
Legault, L. (2016). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In V. Zeigler-Hill, & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp.1-4). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Liu, Y. (2017). Investigating students’ basic needs and motivation in college chemistry courses with the lens of self-determination theory (Dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa, US). Retrieved from
https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8084&context=etd
Loof, D. H., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Petegam, P. V. (2019). Teachers’ motivating style and students’ motivation and engagement in STEM: The relationship between three key educational concepts. Research in Science Education, 49(142), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9830-3
Mazlo, J., Dormedy, D., Neimoth-Anderson, J., Urlacher, T., Carson, G., Haas, E. J., & Kelter, P. (2002). What motivates students in the lab? Assessment of motivational methods in the general chemistry laboratory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(5), 318–321.
Meng, C. C., Idris, N., & Eu, L. K. (2014). Secondary students’ perceptions of assessments in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(3), 219-227.
https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1070a
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2016). Implementation Guide for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in Teaching and Learning. Putrajaya: MOE.
Ministry of Education. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (Preschool to Post-Secondary Education). Putrajaya: MOE.
Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemistry Education, 69(3), 191-196. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed069p191
National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: people, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Olic, S., Adamov, J., & Babi?-Kekez, S. (2014). Motivation as a predictor of pupil’s achievement in chemistry. Research in Pedagogy, 4(2), 24-36.
Orvis, J. N., Sturges, D., Tysinger, P. D., Riggins, K., & Landge, S. (2018). A culture of extrinsically motivated students: Chemistry. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 18(1), 43-57. https://doi: 10.14434/josotl.v18i1.21427
Palmer, T. A., Burke, P. F., & Aubusson, P. (2017). Why school students choose and reject science: A study of the factors that students consider when selecting subjects. International Journal of Science Education, 39(6), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1299949
Perdana, R., Budiyono, S., & Sukarmin. (2019). Analysis of student critical and creative thinking (CCT) skills on chemistry: A study of gender differences. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 9(4), 43-52.
https://www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/jesr/article/view/10530
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Rajendram, R. (2018). Nurturing interest in STEM. The STAR. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2018/05/16/nurturing-interest-in-stem-improvingteachers#B1ZcBeDpKttDRS Gw.99
Roy, S. (2016). Chemistry in our daily life: Preliminary information. International Journal of Home Science, 2(3), 361-366.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Saribiyik, S., Altun?eki?, A., & Yaman, S. (2004). A study on the research of teacher candidate's interest level and problem solving ability for science education course (in Turkish). Proceedings of the XIII National Educational Science Conference. Malatya, Turkey.
Salta, K., & Koulougliotis, D. (2015). Assessing motivation to learn chemistry: adaptation and validation of Science Motivation Questionnaire II with Greek secondary school students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00196F
Samat, N. A. A., Ibrahim, N. H., Surif, J., Ali, M., Abdullah, A. H., Talib, C. A., & Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2019). Chem-A module based on STEM approach in chemical bond. International Journal of Recent Technology in Engineering, 7(6S5), 700-710.
Schumm, M. F., & Bogner, F. X. (2016). Measuring adolescent science motivation. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 434-449.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1147659
Shah, Z. A, Mahmood, N., & Harrison, C. (2013). Attitude towards science learning: an exploration of Pakistani students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 10(2), 35-47. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2362324
Shin, S., Lee, J. K., & Ha, M. (2017). Influence of career motivation on science learning in Korean high school students. Journal of Mathematics, Science, Technology and Education, 13(5), 1517-1538. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00683a
Sisk, D. (2009). Myth 13: The regular classroom teacher can ‘‘go it alone’’. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 269–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346939
Taber, K. (2017). The use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/ extrinsic motivation and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004
Wallace, B, Bernardelli, A, Molyneux, C., Farrell, C., Wallace, B., & Eriksson, G. (2012). Thinking actively in a social context. A universal problem-solving process: a powerful tool to promote differentiated learning experiences. Gifted Education International, 28(1), 58–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429411427645
Ware, S. A. (2001). Teaching chemistry from a societal perspective. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 73(7), 1209-1214.
Zusho, A., Pintrich, P. R., & Coppola, B. (2003). Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25(1), 1081–1094. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000052207

In-Text Citation: (Kanapathy, 2020)
To Cite this Article: Kanapathy, S. A/ P. (2020). Gifted Students’ Knowledge and Motivation Towards Learning Chemistry: A Case Study at Pusat GENIUS@pintar Negara, Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education & Development. 9(2), 722-739.