Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Utilization of Web 2.0 Applications Among Geography Students at Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia

Hanifah Mahat, Nurul Izzati Anuar, Saiyidatina Balkhis Norkhaidi, Mohmadisa Hashim, Nasir Nayan, Yazid Saleh

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v9-i3/8034

Open access

This study aimed to analyze the relationship between usefulness, ease of use and acceptance attitude variables and the utilization of Web 2.0 applications among the geography students of the semester six and seven session of 2019/2020 in Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim, Perak, Malaysia. A quantitative approach using a questionnaire was applied in this study. The study samples consisted of 123 geography students (42 from semester six and 81 students from semester seven). Sample selection was done using simple random sampling. A descriptive analysis (frequency, percent, mean and standard deviation) and inference analysis (Pearson's correlation) were used to answer each research question. The findings of the study showed that the usefulness (M=4.29, SD=0.49), ease of use (M=4.21, SD=.48), as well as the acceptance attitude towards Web 2.0 applications (M=4.24 and SD=.47) were at a high level, while the level of utilization of Web 2.0 applications (M=3.28 and SD=.70) was at a medium level. Results from the Pearson's correlation analysis found that there was a positive and significant relationship between Web 2.0 application usefulness (r=.361, p=.000), ease of use (r=.345, p=.000), and attitude (r=.458, p=.000). Regarding the relationship between the independent variables of the study, there were also positive and significant relationships between ease of use and usefulness (r=.697, p=.000) and between usefulness and ease of use or acceptance attitude towards Web 2.0 applications (r=.624, p=.000 and r=.640, p=.000, respectively). In conclusion, this study showed that the levels of usefulness, ease of use and acceptance attitude towards Web applications among geography students were high but that utilization was medium This indicates that the use of and exposure to Web 2.0 applications at the higher education level are still lacking in the study area. The results of the correlation analysis showed that there was a relationship between all the study variables. Thus, all variables studied should be considered when attempting to increase the utilization of Web 2.0 applications. This information can be used by the Ministry of Education Malaysia, Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia, and the university itself to improve the utilization of Web 2.0 applications to the highest level.

Abdul Hadi, M. D., Theam, L. S., Palaniandy, M., & Jamilah, D. (2016). Penerimaan aplikasi Web 2.0 dalam pelaksanaan kurikulum program berasaskan pembelajaran abad ke-21 di Institut Pendidikan Guru. Jurnal Penyelidikan Dedikasi J, 10, 79–97.
Abdul Manaf, S. Z., Din, R., Hamdan, A., Salleh, M. N. S., Kamsin, I. F., & Abdul Aziz, J. (2015). Penggunaan komputer dan internet Web 2.0 dalam kalangan Generasi Y pelajar universiti. Journal of Advanced Research Design, 7(1), 10–18.
Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher, 11(2), 71–80.
Amin, N. A. H. N., Hasnan, A. S., Besar, N. N., & Almunawar, M. N. (2016). Knowledge sharing using Web 2.0: Preferences, benefits, and barriers in Brunei Darusssalam’s tertiary education. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management. 7(4), 1-18.
Anisur, M., Qi, X., & Islam, T. (2016). Banking access for the poor: Adoption and strategies in rural areas of Bangladesh. Journal of Economic & Financial Studies, 4(3), 1–10.
Aqilah, A., Tan Bee, H., & Arshad, H. (2012). Tertiary students’ application of Web 2.0 for English language learning. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 8(2), 21-37.
Augustsson, G. (2010). Web 2.0 pedagogical support for reflexive and emotional social interaction among Swedish students. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 197–205. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.05.005
Awaludin, F. A., Abd Karim, R., & Saad, M. N. H. (2017). Padlet: A digital collaborative tool for academic writing. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 8(1), 179-184.
Badusah, J., & Baharuddin, S. H. (2015). Tahap penggunaan web 2.0 dalam pengajaran guru bahasa melayu sekolah menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu – JPBM (Malay Language Education Journal – MyLEJ), 5(2), 38–48.
Baharuddin, S. H., & Badusah, J. Suzlina Hilwani, B., & Jamaludin, B. (2016). Tahap pengetahuan, kemahiran dan sikap guru sekolah menengah terhadap penggunaan Web 2.0 dalam pengajaran Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu - JPBM, 6(2), 33–43.
Bingimlas, K. A. (2017). Learning and teaching with web 2.0 applications in Saudi K-12 Schools. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 100–115.
Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2018). Predicting students’ intention to adopt mobile learning: A combination of theory of reasoned action and technology acceptance model. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 11(2), 178-191.
Capo, B. H., & Orellana, A. (2011). Web 2.0 technologies for classroom instruction: High school teachers’ perceptions and adoption factors. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(305), 235–253.
Church, K., & De Oliveira, R. (2013, August). What's up with WhatsApp: Comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS? In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, 352-361. ACM.
Churchill, D. (2009). Educational applications of Web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 179–183. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00865.x
Crook, C., Cummings, J., Fisher, T., Graber, R., Harrison, C., Lewin, C., Logan, K., Luckin, R., Oliver, M. & Sharples, M. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape – opportunities, challenges, and tensions. Research Report. Retrieved from https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1474/1/becta_2008_web2_currentlandscape_litrev.pdf
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(2), 319–339.
DeWitt, D., Alias, N., & Siraj, S. (2017). Collaborative learning: Interactive debates using padlet in a higher education institution. University of Malaya, Malaysia.
Dumitrescu, V. M. (2015). One step ahead: From Web 1.0 to web 2.0 technologies in higher education. Paper presented at the 4th International Scientific Conference: eLearning and Software for Education: eLSE, Bucharest. Romania: CAROLI, National Defence University Publishing House.
Dzvapatsva, G. P., Mitrovic, Z., & Dietrich, A. D. (2014). Use of social media platforms for improving academic performance at Further Education and Training Colleges. South African. Journal of Information Management, 16(1), 1-11.
Elkhani, N., Soltani, S., & Ahmad, N. M. (2014). The effects of transformational leadership and ERP system self-efficacy on ERP system usage. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(6), 759–785.
Ermie D. C. D. (2015). Hubungan faktor kebergunaan, kemudahgunaan dan sikap serta kepuasan guru data dan maklumat terhadap EMIS online. (Master Thesis). Fakulti Seni, Komputeran, dan Industri Kreatif Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Eyyama, R., Menevi, I., & Dogruer, N. (2011). Perceptions of teacher candidates towards Web 2.0 technologies. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences 15(5), 2663–2666.
Fageeh, A. I. (2011). EFL learners’ use of blogging for developing writing skills and enhancing attitudes towards english learning: An exploratory study. Journal of Language and Literature, 2(1), 31-48
Hamdan, A., Din, R., Abdul Manaf, S. Z., Mat Salleh, N. S., Kamsin, I. F., Norman, H., Ismail, N. M., Mohamad Zaid, A. S. (2015). Pengintegrasian Teknologi Web 2.0 dalam Mencapai Pembelajaran Bermakna. Sains Humanika, 1(2012), 51–59.
Hamdan, A., Din, R., Adnan, A., Abdul Manaf, S. Z., Ismail, N. M., Mat Salleh, N. S., & Shafiin, H. (2013). Penggunaan teknologi Web 2.0 dalam pembelajaran hibrid. Tempawan Jurnal Penyelidikan, 1, 87–103.
Harmiza, I. (2017). Hubungan antara penerimaan dengan sikap terhadap penggunaan sistem pengurusan pembelajaran maya. (Master Thesis). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Henry, L., Castek, J., & Zawilinski, L. (2012). Using peer collaboration to support online reading, writing and communication: An empowerment model for struggling readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly. 28, 279-306.
Ishak, M. S. (2014). Pemodelan penerimagunaan maklumat berkaitan Islam di internet: pengaplikasian model penerimaan teknologi (TAM). Journal of Techno Social, 6(2), 49-61.
Karkoulia, K. C. (2016). Teachers' attitudes towards the integration of Web 2.0 tools in EFL teaching. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 1(7), 46-73.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013- 2025. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2015). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2015-2025 (Pendidikan Tinggi), 1–12.
Kripanont, N. (2007). Examining a technology acceptance model of internet usage by academics within thai business schools. (Master Thesis). Faculty of Business and Law, Victoria University
Landell, K. (1997). Management by menu. London: Wiley and Sons Inc.
Lee, S., & Kim, B. G. (2009). Factors affecting the usage of intranet: A confirmatory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 191–201.
Li, L., & Pitts, J. P. (2009). Does it really matter? Using virtual office hours to enhance student-faculty interaction. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 175-185.
Liou, H. C., & Peng, Z. (2009). Training effects on computer-mediated peer review. System, 37(3), 514–525.
Majid, N. N. (2014). Integration of web 2.0 tools in learning a programming course. TOJET,
McFarland, D. J., & Hamilton, D. (2006). Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3), 427–447.
Tanuri, M. Z. A., Azmi, N. A., & Sawal, M. Z. H. (2014). Web 2.0 tools in facilitating the construction of knowledge in higher education. Esteem Academic Journal, 10(2), 1-9.
Norzaidi, M. D., Chong, S. C., Murali, R., & Salwani, M. I. (2007). Intranet usage and managers’ performance in the port industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(8), 1227–1250.
Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H., & Aik, P. (2008). Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers & Education, 50(2), 1084–1091
Park, H. W. (2009). Academic internet use: Issues and lessons in e-research. a paper presented to the communication and technology division, the 59th Annual ICA (International Communication Association) Conference, Chicago, Illinois USA (Chicago Marriott Downtown Magnificent Mile, May 21-25, 2009).
Paul, A. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies, and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch.
Rideout, V., Foehr, U., & Roberts, D. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18- year-olds. A Kaiser Family Foundation Study, 1–72.
Rogers E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation. 5th ed. New York, NY: Free Press
Rogers-Estable, M. (2014). Web 2.0 use in higher education. European Journal of Open, Distance and eLearning,17(2):129-141.
Roussos, P. (2007). The Greek computer attitudes scale: construction and assessment of psychometric properties. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, (1), 578–590.
Soares, D. A. (2008). Understanding class blogs as a tool for language development. Language Teaching Research 12(4), 517–533.
Teo, T. S., Lim, V. K., & Lai, R. Y. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. Omega, 1(1), 25–37.
The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(13), 88–94.
Thomas, J. D. E., Morin, D., & Ly, S. (2014). Delivery method and persistence and performance. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Tampere, Finland, 1797–1801.
Umbit, A., & Taat, M. S. (2016). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerimaan e-pembelajaran dalam kalangan pelajar di institut. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPGK BL, 13, 1–14.
Wan Ali, W. Z., Said Husain, S. K., Ismail, M. R., Ismail, H., Tarmizi, A. R., Hamzah, R., & Konting, M. M. (2009). Amalan penerapan nilai matematik dalam bilik darjah. In Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub & Aida Suraya Md. Yunus. Pendidikan Matematik & Aplikasi Teknologi, 33-66. Selangor, Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Wan Hussain, W. I., & Fadhilah, M. Y. (2016). Kesan pembelajaran elektronik ke atas kemahiran ICT pelajar. E Proceeding National Innovation and Invention Competition Through Exhibition (ICompEx’17).
Yuen, S. C. Y., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Yuen, P. (2011). Perceptions, interest, and use: teachers and Web 2.0 tools in education. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 109–123.

In-Text Citation: (Mahat, et. al., 2020)
To Cite this Article: Mahat, H., Anuar, N. I., Norkhaidi, S. B., Hashim, M., Nayan, N., & Saleh, Y. (2020). Utilization of Web 2.0 Applications Among Geography Students at Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education & Development. 9(3), 41-54.