ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
This paper discussed the integrating animation with experiential learning approach to enhance students’ engagement in learning process. Today’s young generation is expressed a strong preference for the digital world. Within the educational sphere, the development of technologies is defined as a powerful tool to create a huge number of various learning materials. From this view, the use of multimedia technologies is becoming more common in education as well as providing an extremely interesting atmosphere. In line with this, animation has been introduced for the education system since it is a part of students’ daily life. Consequently, the animation must be integrated with the pedagogy such as experiential learning because the integration to foster students’ engagement in the learning process. Indeed, experiential learning is imbued with students’ experience. Experiential learning is a phase where learning should be student-centred because students engaged in direct contact with learning as well as experience that evokes interest in students. This paper discussed the students’ engagement was boosted by the integration of animation and experiential learning.
Baggett, P. (1984). Role of temporal overlap of visual and auditory material in forming dual media associations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 408-417.
Carrillo, R., Renaud, C., Prie, Y., & Lavoue, E. (2017, July). Dashboard for monitoring student engagement in mind mapping activities. In 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 433-437). IEEE.
Chan, C. K. (2013). Use of animation in engaging teachers and students in assessment in Hong Kong higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(5), 474-484.
Chang, D. -F., Chien, W. -C., & Chou, W. -C. (2016). Meta-analysis approach to detect the effect of student engagement on academic achievement. ICIC Express Letter, 10(10), 2441-2446.
Dedouli, M. (2001). Experiential learning-Possibilities of development through the framework of Flexible Zone. Inspection of educational subjects (In Greek), 12(6), 3-8.
Dewey, J. (1973). The philosophy of John Dewey: Two volume in one. Ed by, J. J. McDermott. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). A study on the impact of using multimedia to improve the quality of English language teaching. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 3(6), 1208-1215.
Gunuc, S. (2014). The relationships between student engagement and their academic achievement. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(4), 216-231.
Hii, S. C., & Fong, S. F. (2010). Effects of multimedia redundancy in history learning among ‘deep and surface’ students. Asian Social Science, 6(6), 119-127.
Inceday, N. (2018). The impact of using multimedia technologies on students; academic achievement in the Bakirköy Final College. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 5(1), 40-47.
Jukes, I., McCain, T. D. E., & Crockett, L. (2010). Living on the future edge: Windows on tomorrow. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Konak, A., Clark, T. K., & Nasereddin, M. (2014). Using Kolb’s experiential learning cycle to improve student learning in virtual computer laboratories. Computer & Education, 72, 11-22.
Li, M. (2009). An examination of the role of experiential learning in the development of cultural intelligence in global leaders. Advances in global leadership, 5, 251-271.
Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multimedia aids to problem-solving transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(7), 611-623.
Mayer, R., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 87-99.
McCarthy, M. (2016). Experiential learning theory: From theory to practice. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 14(3), 91-100.
Moreno, R., Mayer, R., & Lester, J. (2000). Life-like pedagogical agents in constructivist multimedia environments: Cognitive consequences of their interaction. In EdMedia + Innovate Learning (pp. 776-781). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Neo, M., & Neo, T. K. (2009). Engaging students in multimedia-mediated Constructivist learning-Students’ perception. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 254-266.
Orús, C., Barlés, M. J., Belanche, D., Casaló, L., Fraj, E., & Gurrea, R. (2016). The effect of learner-generated videos for YouTube on learning outcomes and satisfaction. Computer & Education, 95, 254-269.
Pedersen, H. (2011). Learning with animation. Journal of Enabling, Technologies, 5(1), 35-36.
Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of engineering education, 95(2), 123-138.
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267.
Roberto, J. (2010). Teaching & learning with the iGeneration: Perspectives, strategies, and ideas. Lifelong Faith, 4, 45-54.
Rogers, Y. (2008). A comparison of how animation has been used to support formal, informal, and playful learning. Learning with Animation: Research Implication for Design (pp. 286-3030).
Salomon, G. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 647-658.
Schnotz, W., & Lowe, R. K. (2008). A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. Learning with animation: Research implications for design, 304-356.
Shepard, R. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Bahavior, 6(1), 156-163.
Slavich, G. M., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2012). Transformational teaching: Theoretical underpinnings, basic principles, and core methods. Educational psychology review, 24(4), 569-608.
Svinivki, M., & McKeachie, W. J. (2011). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (Thirteenth ed.). Wadsworth: Belmont, CA.
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell. Australia: ACER Press.
Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital. The rise of the ne generation. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. (2014). Staying engaged: Knowledge and research needs in student engagement. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 137-143.
Wang, M. T., Eccles, J. S. (2012). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 31-39.
Wetzel, C. D., Radtke, P. H., & Stern, H. W. (1994). Instructional effectiveness of video media. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Zhen, Z. (2016). The use of multimedia in English teaching. US-China Foreign Language, 14(3), 182-189.
In-Text Citation: (Tan & Abdullah, 2020)
To Cite this Article: Tan, S. M., & Abdullah, Z. (2020). Integrating Animation with Experiential Learning Approach to Enhance Students’ Engagement in the Learning Process. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(4), 99–105.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode