Journal Screenshot

Multilingual Academic Journal of Education and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2308-0876

NOTE: THIS JOURNAL IS SHIFTED TO NEW
WEBSITE (www.kwpublications.com)

Teaching Mathematics in Inclusion Units of Primary Schools in Greece: Educational Perspectives

Evangelia Boutskou

Open access

The way Inclusion Unit teachers work in Greece does not depend only on their informed decisions about students’ needs but on structural and organizational issues as well. The aim of this study was to explore how Inclusion Unit teachers organize students’ groups during mathematics teaching. We tried to identify which students are taught mathematics in Inclusion Units, what are taught and how. Twenty teachers who worked at twenty Inclusion Units from different socio-economic areas of a big city in northern Greece were interviewed using semi structured open ended questions. The qualitative analysis revealed that students’ needs as well as teacher’s time and organizational issues were important factors that influenced mathematics teaching. The findings of this study highlight the need for school changes and reforms.

Abbott, M., Walton, C., Tapia, Y., & Greenwood, C. R. (1999). Research to practice: A “blueprint” for closing the gap in local schools, Exceptional Children, 65, 339-352.
Baroody, A., & Hume, J. (1991). Meaningful mathematics instruction: the case of fractions, Remedial and Special Education, 12, (3), 54-68.
Burns. (2005). The building blocks of math: My favorite ways to teach addition and subtraction in the early grades. Retrieved February 9 2012 from
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0STR/is_3_115/ai_n15875362
Burns, M. K., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2009). Reported Prevalence of Evidence-Based Instructional practices in Special Education, Journal of Special Education, 43, (1), 3-11.
Cook, B., Landram, T. J., Tankerseley, M., & Kauffman, J. M. (2003). Bringing research to bear in practice. Effective evidence-based instruction for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 345-361.
Covington, M. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dowker, A. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematics difficulties, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, (4), 324-332.
Elliott, S. N., Kettler, R. J., Roach, A. T. (2008). Alternate assessment of modified achievement standards: More accessible and less difficult tests to advance assessment practices? Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 19, 3, 140-152.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., & Paulsen, K. (2002). Hot math: Promoting mathematical problem solving among third grade students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, 70-73.
Geary, D. C. (1994). Children’s mathematical development: research and practical applications. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Gersten, R., Baker, S., & Lloyd, J. W. (2000). Designing High Quality Research in Special Education: Group Experimental Design. Journal of Special Education, Spring, 34, (1), 2-18.
Gibson, D., Haeberli, F. B., Glover, T. A., & Witter, E. (2004). The use of recommended and provided testing accommodations. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 31, (1), 19-36.
Goldman, S., Hasselbring, T., & the Technology group at Vanderblt. (1997). Achieving meaningful mathematics literacy for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, (2), 98-108.
Horton, S., Lovitt, T., and White, O. (1991). Teaching mathematics to adolescents classified as educable mentally handicapped: Using calculators to remove the computational onus. Remedial and Special Education, 13, (3), 36-61.
Howell, K., & Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making (3rd ed), Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thompson Learning.
Hudson, P., & Miller, S. P. (2006). Designing and implementing mathematics instruction for students with diverse learning needs. Boston: Allen & Bacon.
Kelley, B., Hosp, J. L., & Howell, K. W. (2008). Curriculum-based evaluation and math: An overview. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33(4), 250-256.
Malouf, D. F. (2005) Accommodation research to guide practice: Comments on what we know and what we need to know. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 31(1), 79-83.
Plake, B. S. (2008). Standard setters: Stand up and take a stand! Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27, (1), 3-9.
Shriner, J. G., & DeStefano, L. (2003). Participation and accommodation in state assessment: the role of the individualized education programs. Exceptional Children, 69, 147-161.
Sireci, S. G., Li, S., & Scarpati, S. (2003). The effects of test accommodations on test performance: a review of the literature. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst, School of Education.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory procedures and Techniques. London: Sage.
Swanson, L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford Press.
Weinner, B. (1992). Human motivation: metaphors, theories and research. Newbury Park, CA: sage.
Woodward, J., Baxter, J., & Robinson, R. (1999). Rules and reasons: Decimal instruction for academically low achieving students. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14(1), 15-24.
Woodward, J., & Montague, M. (2002). Meeting the Challenge of Mathematics Reform for Students with LD, Journal of Special Education, Summer, 36(2), 89-101.
Yang, X., Shafiel, J., Glasnapp, D., Poggio, J. (2005). Qualitative or Quantitative differences? Latent class analysis of mathematical ability for special education students. Journal of Special Education, Winter, 38(40), 194-207.
Zoniou-Sideri, A. (2005). Contemporary integration approaches. Athens: Ellinika Grammata.

In-Text Citation: (Boutskou, 2014)
To Cite this Article: Boutskou, E. (2014). Teaching mathematics in Inclusion Units of primary schools in Greece: Educational perspectives. Multilingual Academic Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 2(1), 58–69.