ISSN: 2308-0876
NOTE: THIS JOURNAL IS SHIFTED TO NEW
WEBSITE (www.kwpublications.com)
Open access
Although the age of nanotechnology in the world is almost half a century, but now it has become to an influential technology in different areas of industry. In recent decade, Nanotechnology becomes a technology which has competitive advantage for the world, with rapid growth in different fields of knowledge production and planning for commercialization the research achievements. In the mean time, achieving competitive advantage through the development of new products in the field of nanotechnology requires awareness of all active and talent people in this field of the concept of technological corporate-entrepreneurship. In this article, effective factors on the process of technological corporate-entrepreneurship in active technology companies in the field of nanotechnology in Iran are being evaluated and identified and eventually offered a new conceptual model of corporate technopreneurship process in active knowledge-based technological firms in nanotechnology area. The qualitative data was collected through interviews. The methodology is adapted from in-depth interviews with 12 academic experts and managers of technological firms, policymakers active in Nanotechnology industry until theoretical saturation state achieved. The gathered data was analyzed using axial and open coding methods. The results show that the effective determinant of corporate technopreneurship process in active knowledge-based nano-technological firmsincludes of five main factors and 30 axial factors. The main factors are consisting of organizational, external, institutional and other new factors, i.e. technological and individual factors that are shown in new conceptual model of corporate technopreneurship process. The results of this paper can be used for the optimization of corporatenano-technopreneurship of active knowledge-based technological firms in all of world countries.
Antoncic, B. & Prodan, I. (2008), Alliances, corporate technological entrepreneurship and firm performance: Testing a model manufacturing firms. Journal of Technovation, 28, 257-265.
Bailetti, T. (2012), Technology Entrepreneurship: Overview, Definition, and Distinctive Aspects.Journal of Technology Innovation Management Review, February 2012: 5-12.
Blanco, S. (2007). How techno-entrepreneurs build a potentially exciting future? Handbook of Research on Techno-Entrepreneurship, (ed.) by Francois Therin, Edward Elgar, 3-25.
Burgelman, R. A., Maidique, M. A., and Wheelright, S. C. (1996). Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Chicago.
Christopher C. Ibeh, (2009). ADVANCED NANOTECHNOLOGY.Proceedings of the 2009 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education.
Dahlstrand, A. L. (2007). Technology based entrepreneurship and regional development: the case of Sweden. Journal of European Business Rewiev,19(5), 373- 386
Dorf, R.C., & Byers, T. H. (2005). Technology ventures: From idea to enterprise. Newyork: McGraw-Hill
ENTREPRENEURIAL EDUCATION ,Pittsburg State University (PSU), Pittsburg, KS 66762
Feynman, R.( 1961), in miniaturization,ed. Gilbert, H.D. (Reinhold, NewYork), 282-296.
Foster, L.E. (2005). Nanotechnology:Science, Innovation and Opportunity, ISBN: 0131927566, ACM digital library, Available at http://portal.acm.org/ citation.cfm?id=1121649.
Gibson, David V., (1991), Key variables in technology transfer: A field study based empirical analysis, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Elsevier, 8, 28-312.
Johnson, M.A.( 2009). Experiment and theory in harmony. In: Nature Chem.,1(1): 8-9
Kuratko, D.F.( 1993). Intrapreneurship: developing innovation in the corporation. Adv. Global High Technol.Manage.–High Technol. Venturing 3, 3–14
Lai, Wen-Hsiang, Tsai, Chien-Tzu, (2008), Analyzing Influence Factors of Technology Transfer Using Fuzzy Set Theory, PICMET 2008 Proceedings, 27-31 July, Cape Town, South Africa.
Louis Hornyak, G., H.F. Tibbals and Joydeep Dutta,(2008). Introduction to Nanoscience andNanotechnology,Availableatwww.somewhereville.com/blogfiles/nanonews_vol_5_may2008.pdf
LuxResearch(2006), “The nanotech report.” Lux Research Incorporated
Markman Gideon D., Phillip H. Phan ,David B. Balkin, Peter T. Gianiodis, (2005), Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer , Journal of Business Venturing.20 241–263.
Menzel, C. M. Aalito, I. & Ulijin J.M. (2007), On the way to creativity: Engineers as entrepreneurs in organizations. Journal of Technovation, 27(12), 732-734
Nanotechnology Development Headquarters (2012), The evaluation report about Iran’ position in nanotechnology, nanotechnology Monthly, March 2011, vol. 175, p 11
OECD (2009). Nanotechnology: An overview based on Indicators and Statistics, STI Working Paper 2009/7, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, www.oecd.org/sti/working-papers.
Oriakhi, C. O. (2004). Commercialization of nanotechnologies. Master’s thesis of management of technology. Massachusetts institute of technology
Palmberg, Christopher, Denirs, Helene, Miguet, Claire, (2009). Nanotechnology, An Overview Based on Indicators and Statistics, OECD, STI working paper.
Petti, C., Zhang, Sh.(2011), Factors influencing technological entrepreneurship capabilities Towards an integrated research framework for Chinese enterprises.Journal of Technology Management in China, 6 )1(.7-25.
Phillip H. Phan, )2004(.Analyzing the Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Implications for Entrepreneurship Education.16. 1-38.
Preston, J. T. (2001). Success Factors in Technology-Based Entrepreneurship. Massachusetts: Massachusettes Institute of Technology, MIT Entrepreneurship Center
Prodan, I. (2007), A model of technological entrepreneurship. In: Handbook of Research on techno-Entrepreneurship, (Ed) Francois Therin, Edward Elgar
Shane, S. Venkataraman, S. (2003), Guests editors’ introduction to the special issue on technology entrepreneurship, Journal of Research Policy.32 .181–184.
Tajeddini, K. (2010), Effect of customer orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on innovativeness: Evidence from the hotel industry in Switzerland. Journal of Tourism Management, 31. 221–231.
Taniguchi, N.( 1974). On the Basic Concept of ‘Nano-Technology”. Proceedings of the International Conference on Production Engineering, Tokyo, Part II (Japan Society of Precision Engineering)
Tyler, W. (2013).Contextualizing the categorical imperative: Category linkages, technology focus, and resource acquisition in nanotechnology entrepreneurship
Vesper, K.H.( 1984). Three faces of corporate entrepreneurship: a pilot study. Frontiers of EntrepreneurshipResearch 294–320.
Worthington I. & Britton, C. (2006), “the business environment” (6th Ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Zhang, G., Peng X., Li J. (2008), Technological entrepreneurship and policy environment: a case of China, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 15 (4). 733-75.
(Dolatabadi & Meigounpoory, 2013)
Dolatabadi, R. V., & Meigounpoory, M. R. (2013). Effective Determinants of Corporate Nano-Technopreneurship Process in Active Technological Knowledge Base Firms. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 2(5), 127–145.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode