ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Gombe state is a diverse society where social factors significantly influence voting behavior. Voting behavior reflects a society’s political culture and it is concerned with factors that influence voting choices. Therefore, exploring the social factors influencing voting behavior in the 2019 elections is crucial in understanding how the politicians manipulated social forces to achieve their political interests. The paper applies classical liberal democracy theory and a qualitative case study design. Purposive and snowballing selection of informants was conducted through online Zoom in-depth interviews. A thematic approach was used in data analysis. Findings reveal politicians intimidated voters by manipulating ethno-religious sentiment, abject poverty, and low literacy/political education levels, to significantly influence voting behavior to their advantage. The paper recommends government and NGOs should give utmost priority to improving literacy rate, political education level, and poverty alleviation through skills acquisition. There should be zero tolerance for corruption and strict enforcement of the rule of law, where sacred cow treatment is discouraged. Furthermore, the paper recommends farther research in the study area covering the whole of Nigeria using quantitative design to enable for the enrichment of the literature on electoral matters, political behavior, and the influence of social factors in national elections.
Agbor, U.J (2019) Religion as A Determinant of Voter Behaviour: An Analysis Of The Relation Between Religious Inclination And Voting Pattern In Cross River State, Nigeria. Journal of
Social Science Research, Vol. 14 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24297/jssr.v14i0.8357
Akhter, Z. & Sheikh, Y.A (2014) Determinants of Voting Behaviour in India: Theoretical Perspective. Public Policy and Administration Research www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5731(Paper) ISSN
2225-0972(Online) Vol.4, No.8, 2014.
Almond, G.A. & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Antunes, R.J.S. (2010). Theoretical models of voting behaviour. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242653736.
Appadorai, A. (1975). The Substance of Politics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Appadorai, A. (1979). The Substance of Politics. Madras: Oxford University Press.
Babalola, D. (2020). Ethno-religious Voting in Nigeria: interrogating voting patterns in the 2019 presidential election. The Round Table.
Brady, H.E; Verba, S.; & Schlozman, K.L. (1995). Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 89, No. 2 (Jun. 1995), pp. 271-
294. Published by: American Political Science Association. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2082425Accessed: 11/10/2010 14:43
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Qualitative Research Method for Social Science. New Delhi, India: Pearson Education Inc.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006; 2013). Qualitative Research Method for Social Science. New Delhi, India: Pearson Education Inc.
Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) (CFRN, 1999, as amended). Federal Ministry of Information and National Orientation, Abuja.
Chi, K.R., (2016), Identity beats policy when it comes to voter choices: New theory says social identity is a key driver to voter choice. Duke University.
Chimee, I.N. & Ojiakor, N. (2021). The Political Class and the Manipulation of Ethnicity: Nigeria in Perspective. International Journal of Management Studies and Social Science Research
[IJMSSSR 2021], Volume 3, Issue 4 July - August.
Christiane, R.N.N (2017). Electoral Behavior in Sub-Saharan Africa: Explanatory Factors and Implications: An Exploratory Study. Management Studies. 6.
Creswell, J. W. (2014) Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Edinburgh: Pearson Inc.
Cunningham, F. (2002). Theories of Democracy: A Critical Introduction. Routledge, London & New York.
Dahl, R. A. (2015). A Preface to Democratic Theory. Expanded edition. University of Chicago Press.
Dahl, R., Shapiro, I., & Cheibub, J.A (2003). The Democracy Sourcebook. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Press
Dalton, R.J., Shin, D.H., & Jou, W. (2007). Popular Conceptions of the Meaning of Democracy: Democratic Understanding in Unlikely Places. Center for the Study of Democracy (CSD)
(Working Paper). An Organized Research Unit, University of California, Irvine. www.demo.uci.edu
Dworkin, S.L (2012). Sample Size Policy for Qualitative Studies Using In-Depth interviews. Published online: 12 September 2012. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012.
Emeaku, C. (2019). Religion, Ethnicity And Politics As Impeding Factors On Social, Economic and Political Development in Nigeria. Journal of Good Governance and Sustainable
Development in Africa. (JGGSDA), Vol. 4, No. 3, March 2019. ISSN: 2346-724X (P).
Fox, P.W (1960). Louis XIV and the Theories of Absolutism and Divine Right. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, Vol. 26, No. 1 (Feb. 1960), Published by: Wiley on
behalf of Canadian Economics Association. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/138824. Accessed: 13/06/2014 20:06
Green et al. (2002). Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Higazi & Lar (2015). Articulations of belonging: The politics of ethnic and religious pluralism in Bauchi and Gombe States, North-East Nigeria.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276319161_Articulations_of_belonging
Houle, C. (2018). Does ethnic voting harm democracy? Democratization 25(11):1-19 · January 2018 DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2017.1423055
Kalin, M., and Sambanis, N. (2018). How to Think About Social Identity. Annual Review of Political Science. 2018. 21:239–57. The Annual Review of Political Science is online at
polisci.annualreviews.org https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042016-024408
Jankowski, R. (2018). Altruism and Political Participation. Oxford University Press (OUP) Uncorrected Pro.
Jenke, L. & Huettel, S.A. (2016). Issues or Identity? Cognitive Foundations of Voter Choice. Trends Cogn Sci. 20(11): 794– 804. Doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.013
Marsh, J. (2007), The Altruistic Electorate, Greater Good. Berkeley.
Merriam, S.P. (2009) Qualitative Research Method. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
Muller-Rommel, F. & Geibel, B. (2020). Introduction: Perspectives on Democracy. Polit. Vierteljahresschr. Springer. Published online: 14 May 2020.
Norge, A. (2012). Theories of Democracy: (Liberal and Marxist Democracy). Research J. Humanities and Social Sciences. 3(2): April-June 2012.
Ogbu, O.N (2014). Is Nigeria a Secular State? Law, Human Rights and Religion in Context. The Transnational Human Rights Review, Volume 1 Volume 1.
Olanrewaju, I. P; Loromeke, R.E; & Adekoye, R.A (2017). Multiculturalism, Value Differences and Cross-Cultural Conflict in Nigeria. Journal of African Union Studies, Vol.6, No.1, pp. 39-62.
Published by: Adonis & Abbey Publishers Ltd. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26885836
Oldfield, A. (2000). “Liberal Democratic Theory: Some Reflections on Its History and Its Present”, in J. Garrard et al. (eds.) (2000), European Democratization since 1800. Palgrave
Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited.
Oriavwote, P.E, (2000). Marketing Communications Strategy and Voting Behaviour in Nigerian Local Council Elections. PhD Thesis, St. Clements University, Turks and Caicos Islands, British
West Indies.
Potgieter, E. (2013). Predictors of Political Participation in New Democracies: A Comparative Study. A thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at
Stellenbosch University. http://scholar.sun.ac.za
Schools Wikipedia Selection (2007). Liberal Democracy. https://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~rwest/wikispeedia/wpcd/wp/l/Liberal_democracy.htm
Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2013) Research Methods for Business. India: John Wiley & Sons,
Shapiro, I. (2011). The Real World of Democratic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press E-Book.
Shehu, M.I. (2018). Political-Economy of Ethno-Religious Manipulation in Nigerian Politics and Democracy: Intricacies and Implications. Researchgate
Steinmetz, J. (2021). “Politics, Power, and Purpose: An Orientation to Political Science.” Open Educational Resources. 1. Fort Hays State University, Kansas, USA. http://scholars.fhsu.edu/all_oer/1
Sule, B. (2019). The 2019 General Election in Gombe State: An Analysis of the Voting Pattern, Issues, Impacts and its Implications. International Journal of Social Sciences Perspectives.
Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 62-75.
Susu, D.D (2022). Poverty headcount rate in Nigeria 2019, by state. Statista
Toros, E. and Birch, S. (2019): Who are the targets of familial electoral coercion?
Evidence from Turkey, Democratization, DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2019.1639151
https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1639151
United Nations (U.N) (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 21 [1-3]). United Nations, New York, United States of America, USA.
Warren, M.E (2017). A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory. American Political Science Review, 111, 1, 39-53.
Weitz-Shapiro, R. & Winters, M.S. (2018), The Link Between Voting and Life Satisfaction in Latin America. Published online by Cambridge University Press, 02 January 2018.
Yunusa, M.H (2013). The tenets of Liberal Democracy and its practice under Goodluck Jonathan’s administration. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (OMAN Chapter)
Vol. 3, No.4; Nov. 2.
World Bank Report (2020). Also see: National Bureau of Statistics (2020). 2019 Poverty and Inequality in Nigeria: Executive Summary.
(Tal et al., 2024)
Tal, M. K., Ismail, M. M. Bin, Shamsu, K. H. K., & Adnan, Z. H. (2024). Exploring The Social Factors Influencing Voting Behavior in 2019 National Assembly Elections in Gombe State, Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(4), 407–423.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seenavc at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode