Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-3624

Fostering Affective Growth: Human Interaction in Online Higher Education

David Hewitt, Sulochana Nair

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJAREMS/v12-i4/19704

Open access

This study delves into the realm of human interaction within online education, assessing its impact on the affective growth among higher education students. Through a mixed-methods survey involving 23 participations representing 13 nations, various modes of interaction in an online course were compared for their influence on affective development. The course was structured around real-time lectures, supplemented by cohort meetings, text messages, email correspondence, and other communication channels. Results of the study demonstrated that weekly cohort meetings emerged as the highest-rated interaction for fostering affective growth. The qualitative section of the survey corroborated these findings, underscoring the pivotal role of cohort meetings in enhancing student engagement and motivation. These outcomes shed light on the significance of regular, faculty-led, small group interactions in the realm of distance education, providing valuable insights for educators aiming to address the affective dimensions of student learning.

Annand, D. (2011). Social presence within the community of Inquiry Framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(5), 40. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i5.924
CHLOE 8(2023). CHLOE 8: Student Demand Moves Higher Ed Toward a Multi-Modal Future. Changing Landscape of Online Education. Quality Matters and Eduventures Research. (2023, August 15). https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/resource-center/articles-resources/CHLOE-8-report-2023.
Coffey, L. (2023). Report suggests online learning has yet to peak. Inside Higher Ed | Higher Education News, Events and Jobs. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/teaching-learning/2023/08/15/report-suggests-online-learning-has-yet-peak
Council of Europe. (2023). Formal, non-formal and informal learning - linguistic integration of adult migrants (liam) - www.coe.int. Linguistic Integration of Adult Migrants (LIAM). https://coe.int/en/web/lang-migrants/formal-non-formal-and-informal-learning
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer Conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and Future Directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
Hossain, M. I., Tabash, M. I., Siow, M. L., Ong, T. S., & Anagreh, S. (2023). Entrepreneurial intentions of Gen Z university students and entrepreneurial constraints in Bangladesh. Journal of innovation and entrepreneurship, 12(1), 1-34.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1973). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, handbook II affective domain. Longman.
Kyei-Blankson, L., Ntuli, E., & Donnelly, H. (2019). Establishing the importance of interaction and presence to student learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 30(4), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.22158/wjer.v3n1p48
Leslie, H. J. (2019). Trifecta of student engagement. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 13(2), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-10-2018-0024
Moore, M. G., & Clark, G. C. (1989). Readings in principles of Distance Education. Pennsylvania State University.
Moore, M. G. (2018). The Theory of Transactional Distance. In Handbook of Distance Education ed. Michael Grahame Moore and William C. Diehl. Abingdon: Routledge. Accessed 12 Sep 2023.
Picciano, A. G. (2019). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Online Learning, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v6i1.1870
Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2019). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Online Learning, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864
Rubin, B. (2013). Measuring the community in online classes. Online Learning, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v17i3.344
UNESCO. (2023). Non-formal education. UNESCO UIS. http://uis.unesco.org/en/glossary-term/non-formal-education
UNESCO. (2020). Distance learning strategies in response to COVID-19 school closures. Unesdoc.unesco.org. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373305
Weissman, S. (2023). Online learning still in high demand at Community Colleges. Inside Higher Ed | Higher Education News, Events and Jobs. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/institutions/community-colleges/2023/07/07/online-learning-still-high-demand-community
Yu, C., & Prince, D. L. (2022). Active learning and student engagement. Handbook of Research on Active Learning and Student Engagement in Higher Education, 84–112. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9564-0.ch005

N/A