Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Exploring the Perspectives of Pre-University Students on Authentic Collaborative Writing Project

Keezrawati Mujan Yusuf

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i14/8567

Open access

The goal of pre-university programs is to prepare students for undergraduate studies. Therefore, the courses offered in centres of pre-university studies should cultivate higher level of independence and critical thinking which are needed by a university student. This paper explores the usefulness of authentic collaborative writing project to bridge the gap between secondary and tertiary studies. This qualitative study aimed to look into the perspectives of 10 students on the benefits and challenges of their group writing project where they had to publish a mini magazine that explores current social issues. The responses were collected through semi-structured interviews with each student. Generally, it was found that the students regarded the project positively as they were given a high level of autonomy in developing their magazine, which encouraged them to conduct extensive research, group discussion and peer assessment. However, the students noted that they experienced technical difficulties in designing and printing the magazine as it was an unfamiliar genre to them. Some students also commented that they encountered typical problems in group projects such as conflicting ideas and irresponsible group members. The findings have several pedagogical and research implications in pre-university language classrooms.

Aiedah, A. K., & Lee, K. C. (2012). Application of project-based learning in students’ engagement in Malaysian Studies and English Language. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Education (JIRE), 2(1), 37-46.
Allen, N., Atkinson, D., Morgan, M., Moore, T., & Snow, C. (1987). What experienced collaborators say about collaborative writing. Iowa State Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 1(2), 70–90.
Baranes, A. F., Oudeyer, P. Y., & Gottlieb, J. (2014). The effects of task difficulty, novelty and the size of the search space on intrinsically motivated exploration. Frontiers in neuroscience, 8(317), 1-9.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge Editors.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2014). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. New York, NY: Springer.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
Krause, K., Bochner, S., Duchesne, S., &McMauch, A. (2010). Educational psychology for learning & teaching. Melbourne, Australia: Cengage Learning Australia.
Lawrence, D., & Lee, K. W. (2016). Collaborative writing among second language learners using Google Docs in a secondary school context. International Journal on E-Learning Practices (IJELP), 3, 63-82.
Li, M., & Kim, D. (2016). One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 25-42.
Miin, W. P., Rou, L. Y., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). Google Docs: Step by step sentence construction for primary school marginal passing rate pupils. Creative Education, 10(02), 237-245.
Mohamed, R., & Lebar, O. (2017). Authentic assessment in assessing higher order thinking skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 466-476.
Mulligan, C., & Garofalo, R. (2011). A collaborative writing approach: Methodology and student assessment. The Language Teacher, 35, 5-10.
Ong, P. L., & Maarof, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in summary writing: Student perceptions and problems. Procedia – Social Behavioral Sciences Journal, 90, 599- 606.
Ortiz, S. M., & Cuéllar, A. M. T. (2018). Authentic tasks to foster oral production among English as a foreign language learners. HOW, 25 (1), 51–68.
Ramanair, J., Rethinasamy, S., & Misieng, J. (2017). Collaborative writing using Wiki: Tertiary students' perspectives. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 14(1), 84-101.
Rashid, A. A., Yunus, M. M., & Wahi, W. (2019). Using Padlet for collaborative writing among ESL learners. Creative Education, 10(3), 610-620.
Scott, V. M., & Fuente, M. J. D. L. (2008). What's the problem? L2 learners' use of the L1 during consciousness?raising, form?focused tasks. The Modern language journal, 92(1), 100-113.
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of second language writing, 14(3), 153-173.
Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. New York, NY: Multilingual Matters.
Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative Evaluation Methods. New York, NY: Sage.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children, 23(3), 34-41.

In-Text Citation: (Yusuf, 2021)
To Cite this Article: Yusuf, K. M. (2021). Exploring the Perspectives of Pre-University Students on Authentic Collaborative Writing Project. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(14), 199–210.