ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
This study aims to build the Holistic Assessment Standard (HAS) instrument for handball games based on the teaching method of Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) in Form 2 Physical Education through the Holistic Assessment Standards (HAS) approach. The construction process of the Holistic Assessment Standard (HAS) uses two models as the basis for the process of forming and constructing it, namely Dick & Carey Model and Morrow Model as well as seven resources to assess the students' mastery and achievements which are the main thrive as a reference in the construction of this instrument, the TGfU Model, Malaysian Education Development Plan Document (PPPM) 2013 - 2025, Relevant Professional Circular Letter, Curriculum and Assessment Standard Document (DSKP) Form 2, Contruktivism Theory, Krathwohl Taxonomy, Bloom & Masia, and Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Discussion focuses on the construction of Holistic Assessment Standards (HAS) instruments involving teacher assessment methods through observation and works sheets. The assessment method aims to collect data to measure the level of mastery and achievement of students' learning in terms of psychomotor, cognitive, and affective domains involving two phases i.e. construction phase and instrument effectiveness phase. The design of this study is in the form of pre-experiment methods – a one-time study of cases used for both phases of the study. As a result of this study, the study could produce holistic assessment instruments, user-friendly and able to measure students' differences in terms of mastery and achievement in handball games, in line with the needs of school-based assessment and should be used in the physical education teaching and learning process for form 2 handball games and have an approach as a guide to improving the quality of assessment as desired in the Malaysian Educational Development Plan (PPPM) 2013-2025.
Abu Bakar, N. (1985). Penilaian afektif. Masa Enterprise. Jaya: Longman Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
Adam, A. (2013). The position of team sports in high school. Ranged, 10, 16-21.
Ahmad, H. (2003). Penggunaan Pembelajaran Berbantukan Komputer Mata Pelajaran Asas Perakaunan (H1002) (Doctoral dissertation, Kolej Universiti Teknologi Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia).
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., James, R., Wittrock, M. C. (2001) A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran: Pendidikan Jasmani dan Pendidikan Kesihatan Tingkatan 2. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Bauersfeld, H. (1995). The Structuring of the Structures: Development and Function of Mathematizing as a Social Practice. In: L. P. Steffe and J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in Education (pages 137-158). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for teaching games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18, 5-8.
Bunker, B., & Thorpe, R. (1986). The curriculum model. In R. Thorpe, Bunker, D., & Almond, L (Ed.), Rethinking games teaching (pp. 7-10). University of Technology, Loughborough.
Dick, W., & Carrey, L. (1985). The Systematic Design Instruction. Second edition. Scott, Foreman and Company
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O., (2001). The systematic design of instruction (5th ed.). Addison-Wesley, Longman.
Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Constructivism: new implications for instructional technology. Educational Technology, May 1991, p. 7-12.
Etemi, F. Z. (2011). Supporting and Developing the Structures for the Quality Assurance at the Private Higher Education Providers. Kosova Accereditation Agency
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. Merrill Greenwood.
Griffin, L. L., & Patton, K. (2005). Two decades of teaching games for understanding: Looking at past, present and future. In L. Griffin & J. Butler (Eds.), Teaching games for understanding: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1-17). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Griffin, L. L., Mitchell, S. A., & Oslin, J. L. (1997). Teaching sports concepts and skill: A tactical games approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Gray, S., & Sproule, J. (2011). Developing pupils’ performance in team invasion games. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980903535792
Hamimah A. N., & Rohaya, T. (2014) Cabaran pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah: dilema guru. Prosiding Seminar Antarabangsa Kelestarian Insan 2014., 9 – 10 2014.
Hopper, T. (2003). Teaching games for understanding: The importance of student emphasis over content emphasis. JOPERD, 73(7), 44-48.
Howey, K. R. (1998). Introduction to the commissioned papers. In Contextual teaching and learning: Preparing teachers to enhance student success in the workplace and beyond. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education, Center on Education and Training for Employment and Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education, American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025: Pendidikan Prasekolah hingga Lepas Menengah. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014). Pelan Pembangunan Profesionalisme Berterusan (PPB) (Guru dan Pemimpin Sekolah). Bahagian Pendidikan Guru, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kirk, D., & McPhail, A. (2002). Teaching Games for Understanding and Situated Learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe Model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 177–192.
Konting, M. M. (2000). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives the classification of educational goals, handbook II: Affective domain. David McKay Company, Inc.
Lembaga Peperiksaan Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2011). Buku Panduan Pengurusan dan Pengendalian Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah (PBS), Sekolah Rendah. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia
Liza, S. (2017) Pentaksiran pembelajaran kemahiran asas bagi permainan kategori serangan dalam Pendidikan Jasmani tahun 4. (Doctoral dissertation,Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris).
Lynda, W. (2004). “Jump Start Authentic Problem Based Learning.” Prentice Hall. Inc
Mercier, K. & Doolittle, S. (2013): Assessing Student Achievement in Physical Education for Teacher Evaluation, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 84:3, 38-42
McKeen, K., Webb, P., & Pearson, P. (2005). Promoting physical activity through teaching games for understanding in undergraduate teacher education. AISEP, 2005 World Congress Proceedings. Active Lifestyles. The Impact of Education and Sport, 251-258.
Mitchell, S. A., Griffin, L. L., & Oslin, J. L. (2006). Teaching sports skills: A tactical games approach (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Hanapiah, M. K. (2019). Keberkesanan Pentaksiran Ekstensif (PE) Bagi Permainan Kategori Memadang dalam Pendidikan Jasmani Tahun 5. (Doctoral dissertation,Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris).
Izwan, M. S. (2017). Keberkesanan Instrumen Pentaksiran (IPP) Berasaskan Teaching Games for Understanding (TGFU) Bagi Permainan Badminton. (Doctoral dissertation,Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris).
Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2008). In Teaching Physical Education (1st online ed.). Retrieved from http://www.spectrumofteachingstyles. org/ ebook
Morrow, J. R., Jackson, A. W., Disch, J. G., & Mood, D. P. (2005). Measurement and evaluation in human performance (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kemp, J. E. (2001). Designing effective instruction (3rd ed.) John Wiley & Sons.
Norkhalid, S. (2012). Pentaksiran Komprehensif Berbanding Penilaian Kendiri Sekolah Mengah Dalam Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Tingkatan 2. (Doctoral dissertation,Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris).
Norazilawati, A., Nik, A., Rosnidar, M. (2012). Pelaksanaan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Dalam Mata Pelajaran Sains. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains and Matematik Malaysia, 2(1):78-91.
Piaget, J. (1973). The child and reality (A. Rosin, Trans.). Grossman
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum (2001). Huraian sukatan pelajaran bersepadu sekolah menengah: Pendidikan jasmani. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Rahman, M. A. B. A., & Ali, Z. B. (2008). Perlaksanaan Pentaksiran Kerja Kursus Kemahiran Hidup Bersepadu Di Sekolah Menengah Luar Bandar Daerah Kuantan, Pahang. http://eprints.utm.my/10757/1
Ramlah A. K, Jamil, A., & Analisa, H. (2015). Pembentukan Sikap Positif Guru Terhadap Pelaksanaan Aktiviti Pentaksiran. Journal of Personalized Learning 1(1):77-84
Richard, J. F., & Wallian, N. (2005). Emphasizing students’ engagement in construction of game performance. In L. Griffin & J. Butler (Eds.), Teaching games for understanding: Theory, research and practice (pp. 19-32). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Salimin, N., Jani, J., Rahmat, A., Haziyanti, N., Khalid, M., Pendidikan, U., Komprehensif, M. P. (2013). Modul Penilaian Komprehensif Bagi Pertolongan Cemas Dalam Pendidikan Jasmani Dan Kesihatan (Comprehensive Assessment Module for First Aids in Physical Education and Health). Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 28, 155–171.
Salimin, N., Jani, J., Shahril, M. I., & Elumalai, G. (2015). Validity and reliability of comprehensive assessment instruments for handball and badminton games in physical education. Asian Social Science, 11(23), 12–21.
Shen, B. (2014). Outside-school physical activity participation and motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12004
Som, N., & Mohd, D. A. R. (1998). Kemahiran Berfikir Secara Kritis dan Kreatif (KBKK). Pearson Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
Sulaiman, K. P., Abu Bakar. (1999). Kajian Mengenai Kemahiran Proses Sains di Sekolah Rendah. (Unpublished doctoral). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Soon, S. M. (2004). Ilmu Pendidikan untuk KPLI. Terbitan Ketiga. Kumpulan Budiman Sdn Bhd,
Soon, S. M. (2006). Nota Pengurusan Pengajaran-Pembelajaran. Multimedia-ES Resources Sdn Bhd
Stolz, S., Pill, S. (2014) Teaching Games and Sport for Understanding: Exploring and Reconsidering its Relevance in Physical Education. EPER, 2014; 20: 36-71.Samdin, M. A. Bin, Shahril, M. I. Bin, & Salimin, N. Bin. (2021). Construction of Holistic Assessment Standard (Has) for Handball Game Based on Teaching Games for Understanding (TGFU) Teaching Methods. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(1), 171–186.
Veloo, A. (2011) Keupayaan teori dan pelaksanaan pentaksiran dalam pembelajaran. Journal of Governance and Development, 7. pp. 8-15. ISSN 2289-4756
Werner, P., Thorpe, R., & Bunker, D. (1996). Teaching games for understanding: Evolution of a model. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 67(1), 28-33.
Webb, P. I., & Pearson, P. J. (2008). An integrated approach to teaching games for understanding (TGfU). Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/52
In-Text Citation: (Samdin et al., 2020)
To Cite this Article: Samdin, M. A. Bin, Shahril, M. I. Bin, & Salimin, N. Bin. (2020). Construction of Holistic Assessment Standard (Has) for Handball Game Based on Teaching Games for Understanding (TGFU) Teaching Methods. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(2), 171–186.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode