Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

The Acute Effect of Emom vs Amrap Protocol in Crossfit Training on Muscle Strength among Healthy Adults

Nadhirah Lisa Diyana Mohd Firdaus , Maisarah Shari, Raja Nurul Jannat Raja Hussain, Noor Azila Azreen Md Radzi, Wan Ahmad Munsif Wan Pa, Mohamad Firdaus Ahmad, Ellail Ain Mohd Aznan, Ali Md Nadzalan, Nurul Ain Abu Kasim

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v15-i7/25931

Open access

CrossFit training is a high-intensity fitness training regimen that merges a variety of physical exercises, where it is designed to improve overall fitness and health, targeting multiple domains such as stamina, strength, flexibility, speed, coordination, and balance. Despite that, the existing literature on CrossFit training reveals a noticeable gap in studies specifically there are limited studies conducted comparing EMOM (Every Minute on Minute) and AMRAP (As Many Repetitions as Possible) protocols in CrossFit and lack of data examining the acute effect of CrossFit training. Thus, this study aimed to determine the acute effects of two CrossFit training protocols EMOM and AMRAP on the muscle strength of healthy adults. A quasi-experimental design was employed, with pre-test, ongoing test, and post-test assessments conducted on eight selected healthy adults. The eight participants, including 4 males and 4 females, underwent a pre-test, EMOM (2 days following the pre-test), ongoing test (2 days following the EMOM session), a washing period for 7 days, an AMRAP session, and a post-test. The upper and lower body strength test was evaluated using bench press and leg press exercises. There were no statistically significant differences found between the EMOM and AMRAP protocols in both upper and lower body strength, as p>.05. However, AMRAP demonstrated a slightly greater magnitude of improvement in muscle strength by 28.04% in upper body strength and 10.59% in lower body strength. This suggests that AMRAP may be more effective for enhancing muscle strength, but further research with larger sample sizes is warranted to confirm these findings.

Chukhlantseva, N., Cherednychenko, I., & Kemkina, V. (2020). The influence of high-intensity functional training versus resistance training on the main physical fitness indicators in women aged 25-35 years. Trends in Sport Sciences, 27(3), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.23829/TSS.2020.27.3-6
Foster, C., Rodriguez-Marroyo, J. A., & De Koning, J. J. (2017). Monitoring training loads: The past, the present, and the future. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(May), S2–S8. https://doi.org/10.1123/IJSPP.2016-0388
Gibala, M. J., Little, J. P., Macdonald, M. J., & Hawley, J. A. (2012). Physiological adaptations to low-volume, high-intensity interval training in health and disease. Journal of Physiology, 590(5), 1077–1084.
McWeeny, D. K., Boule, N. G., Neto, J. H. F., & Kennedy, M. D. (2020). Effect of high-intensity functional training and traditional resistance training on aerobic, anaerobic, and musculoskeletal fitness improvement. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20(4), 1791–1802. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.04243
Mujika, I., & Padilla, S. (2001). Cardiorespiratory and metabolic characteristics of detraining in humans. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33(3), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200103000-00013
Nik-Nasir, N. M., Md-Yasin, M., Ariffin, F., Mat-Nasir, N., Miskan, M., Abu-Bakar, N., & Yusoff, K. (2022). Physical activity in Malaysia: Are we doing enough? Findings from the REDISCOVER study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), Article 16888. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416888
Pareja-Blanco, F., Rodríguez-Rosell, D., Sánchez-Medina, L., Sanchis-Moysi, J., Dorado, C., Mora-Custodio, R., Yáñez-García,J. M., Morales-Alamo, D., Pérez-Suárez, I., Calbet, J. A. L., & González-Badillo, J. J. (2017). Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on athletic performance, strength gains, and muscle adaptations. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 27(7), 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12678
Schoenfeld, B. J. (2010). The mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy and their application to resistance training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(10), 2857–2872. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e840f3
Spradley, B. D., Crowley, K. R., Tai, C. Y., Kendall, K. L., Fukuda, D. H., Esposito, E. N., Moon, S. E., & Moon, J. R. (2012). Ingesting a pre-workout supplement containing caffeine, B-vitamins, amino acids, creatine, and beta-alanine before exercise delays fatigue while improving reaction time and muscular endurance. Nutrition and Metabolism, 9, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-9-28
Tibana, R. A., de Sousa, N. M. F., Cunha, G. V., Prestes, J., Fett, C., Gabbett, T. J., & Voltarelli, F. A. (2018). Validity of session rating of perceived exertion method for quantifying internal training load during high-intensity functional training. Sports, 6(3), Article 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6030068
Tibana, R. A., Neto, I. V. de S., de Sousa, N. M. F., Romeiro, C., Hanai, A., Brandão, H., Dominski, F. H., & Voltarelli, F. A. (2021). Local muscle endurance and strength had strong relationship with CrossFit® open 2020 in amateur athletes. Sports, 9(7), Article 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports9070098
Wagener, S., Wilhelm, M., Hotfiel, T., & Engelhardt, M. (2020). CrossFit® – Development. Sports Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 36(January), 241–249.
Yang, Y. J. (2019). An overview of current physical activity recommendations in primary care. Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 40(3), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.19.0038

Firdaus, N. L. D. M., Shari, M., Hussain, R. N. J. R., Radzi, N. A. A. M., Pa, W. A. M. W., Ahmad, M. F., Aznan, E. A. M., Nadzalan, A. M., & Kasim, N. A. A. (2025). The Acute Effect of Emom vs Amrap Protocol in Crossfit Training on Muscle Strength among Healthy Adults. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(7), 1210–1220.