ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
This article investigates the usage of stance markers and the constructed authorial identities by China’s highly cited researchers based on Hyland’s stance model and Sun’s identity classification. It adopts a mixed-method approach combining quantitative data and qualitative pragmatic analysis based on a self-built corpus of 200 abstracts of 36,183 words. Quantitative data show that there are 1534 stance markers in the abstracts examined. China’s highly cited researchers predominantly employ hedges and boosters with attitude markers and self-mentions less frequently used when expressing the stance in their abstracts. In terms of identity construction, they construct the identity of representor most frequently, which is significantly more than evaluator and interactor. Through qualitative textual analysis, it is found that hedges and boosters help China’s highly cited researchers construct the identity of cautious representor; attitude markers construct the identity of objective evaluator; and self-mentions construct the identity of active interactor. Findings of this study are expected to provide pedagogical implications for the teaching of EFL learners’ academic writing.
Akba?, E., Da?deviren-Kirmizi, G., & Kirmizi, Ö. (2024). “Here, We Investigate If There Is…”: A functional investigation of self-mentions in research article abstracts. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 47(2), 196-218.
Alonso Almeida, F., & Vázquez, N. (2009). Modality and stance in the modern English part of the" Corpus of early English recipes". In A survey of corpus-based research [Recurso electrónico] (pp. 1171-1179). Murcia: Asociación Española de Lingüística del Corpus, 2009.
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1988). Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse processes, 11(1), 1-34.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Finegan, E., Conrad, S., & Leech, G. N. (2021). Grammar of spoken and written English.
Campbell, P. (1975). The personae of scientific discourse. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 391-405
Chen, Q. (2021). Comparative study of the stance markers in Chinese and international research article abstracts. Foreign Language Research,(2), 41-47.
Chen, Q., & Shi, H. (2024). A diachronic study of stance markers in the English abstracts of linguistic research articles. Foreign Language Research, (4), 23–30.
Chen, X. (2013). Pragmatic identity: Dynamic choice and discursive construction. Foreign Languages Research, (4), 27-32.
Chen, X. (2014). Current research on identity from the pragmatic perspective: Key issues and main approaches. Modern Foreign Languages, 37(5), 702-710.
Clarivate. (2023, November 15). Clarivate unveils 2023 list of Highly Cited Researchers, identifying exceptional scientific talent. https://clarivate.com.cn/2023/11/15/hcr2023/
Deng, L. (2012). The construction of academic identity in the discussion and conclusion sections of second language thesis writing: A case study of Chinese social science Phd students [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, (3), 301-323, 381.
Dontcheva?Navratilova, O. (2025). Hedges and boosters in L2 (Czech) Master's theses and published research articles: A contrastive analysis. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 73-90.
Dueñas, P. M. (2010). Attitude markers in business management research articles: A cross-cultural corpus-driven approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 50-72.
Gillaerts, P., & Van de Velde, F. (2010). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic purposes, 9(2), 128-139.
Han, J. (2010). The construction of writer identity as self-promotion in academic research articles. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Hu, G., & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English-and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of pragmatics, 43(11), 2795-2809.
Huckin, T. (2001). Abstracting from abstracts. Academic writing in context: Implications and applications. Birmingham: The University of Birmingham Press.
Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for specific purposes, 20(3), 207-226.
Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 8, 1091-1112.
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse studies, 7(2), 173-192.
Hyland, K. (2005a). Metadiscourse: Exploring Writing in Interaction. London: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2015). Genre, discipline and identity. Journal of english for academic purposes, 19, 32-43.
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2016). Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance. Written Communication, 33(3), 251-274.
Hyland, K., & Zou, H. J. (2021). “I believe the findings are fascinating”: stance in three-minute theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 50, 100973.
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2022). Metadiscourse choices in EAP: An intra-journal study of JEAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 60, 101165.
Huang, L., & Han, J. (2021). Hedging in consensus-building in academic discourse. Foreign Language Research, (4).
Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China. (2022, December 29). China science and technology papers statistical report (2): China outstanding science and technology papers report. https://stm.castscs.org.cn/yw/39938j.html.
Jiang, F. K., & Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscursive nouns: Interaction and cohesion in abstract moves. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 1-14.
Jiang, Y., & Tao, M. (2007). A contrastive study of hedges in the discussion sections of English and Chinese medical research articles. Foreign Language Research, (6), 115–122.
Kaltenböck, G., Mihatsch, W., & Schneider, S. (Eds.). (2012). New approaches to hedging (Vol. 9). Brill.
Kuo, C. H. (1999). The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for specific purposes, 18(2), 121-138.
Li, Z., & Cheng, X. (2020). A comparative study on stance markers in English abstracts of Chinese and foreign academic journals. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University, 28(2), 6-10.
Liu, S. (2011). Self-mentions and identity construction in Chinese and English research article abstracts. Contemporary Rhetorics, (4), 85-88.
Liu, Y., & Chen, Y. (2020). Contrastive study on stance markers in MA theses in applied linguistics by Chinese and American students. Foreign Languages in China, (3), 81–89.
Liu, Y., Deng, T., & Chen, Y. (2023). A study of stance markers and identity construction in academic discourse of English majors in China. Foreign Language Research, (5), 58–65.
Lou, B., & Wang, L. (2020). Self-mentions and authorial identity construction in Chinese learners' English academic writing. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 43(1), 93–99.
Lou, B., & Yao, W. (2019). Features of stance adverbs in learners’ academic writing. Journal of Henan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), (3), 114-120.
Martín, P. M. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for specific purposes, 22(1), 25-43.
Meyer, P. G. (1997). Coming to Know: Studies in the lexical semantics and pragmatics of academic English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Ouyang, H., & Tang S. (2006). Authorial identity in Chinese graduates’ English argumentative writing [J]. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, (2), 49-53.
Sun, L. (2015). A study of Chinese MA students’ construction of pragmatic identities in English thesis abstracts. Foreign Languages and Teaching, (5), 15-21.
Sun, L. (2020). The study of metadiscourse use and identity construction in Chinese master’s academic English writing. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University, 28(4), 28-33.
Tang, J. (2012). Authorial identity construction in English and Chinese academic theses. Shandong University.
Tankó, G. (2017). Literary research article abstracts: An analysis of rhetorical moves and their linguistic realizations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 27, 42-55.
Vassileva, I. (2001). Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 83–102.
Wang, J., & Jiang, F. (2019). Stance construction in academic English writing by Chinese PhD students of science and engineering. Foreign Language World, (3), 23-31.
Wang, J., & Lv, Z. (2017). Study on the self-mentions in the academic English writing of Chinese PhD students of science and engineering. Foreign Language World, (2), 89-96.
Wang, J., & Zeng, L. (2021). Disciplinary recognized self-presence: Self-mention used with hedges and boosters in PhD students’ research writing. Sage Open, 11(2), 21582440211005454.
Wilkinson, A. M. (1992). Jargon and the passive voice: Prescriptions and proscriptions for scientific writing. Journal of technical writing and communication, 22(3), 319-325.
Wu, G. (2010). Identity construction in English and Chinese research articles: A contrastive study. Shanghai International Studies University.
Wu, G. (2010a). A Comparative Study on the Markers of Authorial Stance in the Conclusion Sections of English-Chinese Research Papers [J]. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University, 18 (4), 46-50.
Wu, B., & Paltridge, B. (2021). Stance expressions in academic writing: A corpus-based comparison of Chinese students’ MA dissertations and PhD theses. Lingua, 253, 103071.
Wu, Y. (2025). Authorial identity construction through implicit stance-taking in the introduction of research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 78, 88-108.
Yun, H. (2009). Presence and concealment of authorial identity in thesis abstracts: A rhetorical study based on international journals of medicine and linguistics in 2008. Foreign Language Teaching, (5), 29-32.
Zhao X., & Zhu, J. (2024). Knowledge stance and evolution of hotspots in the study of “highly cited scholars”. Journal of SJTU (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 32(8), 108-121.
Xiaomeng, J., Ibrahim, N. M., Lijin, Z., Jinghan, F., & Wenjing, S. (2025). Identity Construction in China’s Highly Cited Researchers’ Research Article Abstracts. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(7), 1087–1104.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode