ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
This study explores how international news coverage frames United States and China in Malaysian newspapers, focusing on five dominant news frames: conflict, cooperation, economic impact, human interest, and morality. Drawing on a content analysis of 330 news articles from diverse global outlets, the study employs both descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression to identify patterns and predictors of frame usage. The results reveal that framing varies significantly by country, topic, and actor presence rather than by media outlet affiliation. China is predominantly framed through economic impact, reflecting its image as an emerging economic power, whereas the U.S. is more frequently associated with conflict and human interest narratives, aligning with perceptions of its global political and military dominance. Cooperation and morality frames, however, are more evenly distributed across both nations. Binary logistic regression identifies news topic and actor presence as the strongest predictors of frame usage: political topics trigger conflict and morality frames, economic topics predict economic framing, and citizen-centered stories evoke human interest and cooperation frames. Media outlet affiliation shows minimal influence, suggesting professional convergence in international journalism. These findings highlight the content-specific and actor-sensitive nature of framing, underscoring the importance of contextual factors in cross-national media analysis.
Chang, T. K. (1998). All countries not created equal to be news: World system and international communication. Communication Research, 25(5), 528–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025005004
Dimitrova, D. V., & Connolly-Ahern, C. (2007). A tale of two wars: Framing analysis of online news sites in coalition countries and the Arab world during the Iraq War. The Howard Journal of Communications, 18(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170701309973
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Golan, G., & Wanta, W. (2003). International elections on U.S. network news: An examination of factors affecting newsworthiness. Gazette, 65(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/001654920306500103
Gong, W., & Guo, Q. (2022). Framing public opinion on physician-patient conflicts on microblog: A comparative content analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article 831638. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.831638
Jebril, N., de Vreese, C. H., van Dalen, A., & Albæk, E. (2013). The effects of human interest and conflict news frames on the dynamics of political knowledge gains: Evidence from a cross-national study. Scandinavian Political Studies, 36(3), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2012.00576.x
Lyu, Y., Liao, T., & Huang, X. (2021). Framing crisis reporting of COVID-19: A comparative study of Greater China. Journalism and Communication Research, 28(3), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03848-y
Nain, Z. (2002). The structure of the media industry: Implications for democracy. In F. Loh & K. B. Saravanamuttu (Eds.), New politics in Malaysia (pp. 111–137). Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. https://doi.org/10.1142/5668
Reese, S. D. (2001). Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 7–31). Routledge.
Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2nd ed.). Longman.
Supadhiloke, B. (2012). Framing the Sino–U.S.–Thai relations in the post-global economic crisis. Public Relations Review, 38(5), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.09.027
Tang, L., Chen, H., & Li, X. (2023). Framing China during crises: A comparative media analysis. Global Media and China, 8(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364221101234
Wu, H. D. (2000). Systemic determinants of international news coverage: A comparison of 38 countries. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02841.x
Yi, Y., Liu, H., & Yang, Y. (2024). Media debates about China’s role as a global public goods supplier: Frame contestation in reporting on the Chinese COVID-19 vaccine. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02200-w
Hongyu, M., Ahmad, A. M., Waheed, M., & Zawawi, J. W. M. (2025). What Shapes the Frame? The Role of Country, Topic, and Actor in the Framing of U.S. and China’s International Reports in Malaysian Press. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(7), 1841–1854.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode