Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Grand Narratives, Grim Realities? ESG Rhetoric and Legitimacy Management in the Taiwanese Food Industry

Lin Yihuan, Choo Wei Chong, Ng Keng Yap, Zhang Juan

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v15-i12/27152

Open access

In the food industry, operational safety is inextricably linked to public trust, making occupational accidents a severe threat to organizational legitimacy. When safety failures occur, they are interpreted not merely as material risks but as profound moral breaches that demand a strategic response. While Western institutional logic predicts that firms will repair this trust through transparency and direct accountability, this assumption often conflicts with the indigenous values of East Asian’s face culture, which prioritizes dignity and the avoidance of public shame. To bridge this gap between theoretical expectations and indigenous practice, this study proposes a framework of “face deflection” to examine how firms navigate legitimacy threats. Using Structural Topic Modeling (STM), we analyzed the “Letter to Shareholders” in the ESG reports of listed Taiwanese food companies from 2021 to 2024 to test the relationship between rhetorical topics and the Occupational Accident Rate (OAR). The empirical results reveal a distinct cultural logic: as accident rates rise, firms do not increase disclosures related to routine compliance or affective care. Instead, they significantly mobilize grand narrative rhetoric, characterized by abstract, future-oriented themes such as AI and global governance, to actively assert Mianzi (social face) and deflect attention from the damaged Lian (moral face). These findings challenge the universality of transparency-based legitimacy repair, demonstrating that in Confucian societies, firms employ rhetorical abstraction to mask operational failures.

Abatecola, G., & Cristofaro, M. (2018). Hambrick and Mason’s “Upper Echelons Theory”: Evolution and open avenues. Journal of Management History, 26(1), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-02-2018-0016
Ammar, A., Yousaf, M., Ahmad, K., & Bibi, S. A. (2022). Playing upon knowledge through language games: Lyotard’s ‘The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge.’ Journal of Humanities, Social and Management Sciences (JHSMS), 3(2), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.jhsms/3.2.4
Augustin-Jean, L., & Poulain, J.-P. (Eds.). (2020). Risk and food safety in China and Japan: Theoretical perspectives and empirical insights. Routledge.
Baier, C. (2024). Narratives of Post-Truth: Lyotard and the Epistemic Fragmentation of Society. Theory, Culture & Society, 41(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764231162027
Benoit, K., Watanabe, K., Wang, H., Nulty, P., Obeng, A., Müller, S., & Matsuo, A. (2018). quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(30), 774–774. https://doi.org/10/gf2b6d
Beretta, V., Demartini, M. C., & Trucco, S. (2020). Tone at Top in Integrated Reporting: The Role of Non-Financial Performance. In L. Songini, A. Pistoni, P. Baret, & M. H. Kunc (Eds.), Non-Financial Disclosure and Integrated Reporting: Practices and Critical Issues (Vol. 34, p. 0). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-351220200000034009
Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a Theory of Social Judgments of Organizations: The Case of Legitimacy, Reputation, and Status. The Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29765019
Bitektine, A., Hill, K., Song, F., & Vandenberghe, C. (2020). Organizational Legitimacy, Reputation, and Status: Insights from Micro-Level Measurement. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2017.0007
Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2007). A correlated topic model of science. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 17–35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4537420
Boje, D. M., Oswick, C., & Ford, J. D. (2004). Language and Organization: The Doing of Discourse. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 571–577. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.14497609
Bonaccorso, G. (2025). Is It all Fake? The Rhetoric in CSR and Sustainability Communication: Literature Review. In D. Hejlová, P. Koudelková, H. Moravcová, S. Romenti, & C. Valentini (Eds.), Responsibility in Strategic Communication: Truth or Trap? (Vol. 8, p. 0). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-391420250000008005
Brennan, N. M., & Merkl-Davies, D. M. (2013). Accounting narratives and impression management. In The Routledge Companion to Accounting Communication. Routledge.
Buckley, P. J., Clegg, J., & Tan, H. (2006). Cultural awareness in knowledge transfer to China—The role of guanxi and mianzi. Journal of World Business, 41(3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2006.01.008
Castelló, I., & Lozano, J. M. (2011). Searching for New Forms of Legitimacy Through Corporate Responsibility Rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10/bxqjq9
Chao, S., Wang, S., Li, H., & Yang, S. (2023). The power of culture: Does Confucian culture contribute to corporate environmental information disclosure? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(5), 2435–2456. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2495
Chou, K., & Liou, H. (2010). ‘System Destroys Trust?’—Regulatory Institutions and Public Perceptions of Food Risks in Taiwan. Social Indicators Research, 96(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9465-2
Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176–1248. https://doi.org/10/gnbstk
Corazza, L., Truant, E., Scagnelli, S. D., & Mio, C. (2020). Sustainability reporting after the Costa Concordia disaster: A multi-theory study on legitimacy, impression management and image restoration. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(8), 1909–1941. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2018-3488
Deegan, C. M. (2019). Legitimacy theory: Despite its enduring popularity and contribution, time is right for a necessary makeover. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2307–2329. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2018-3638
Diao, S., Bai, J., Song, Y., Zhang, T., & Wang, Y. (2020). ZEN: Pre-training Chinese Text Encoder Enhanced by N-gram Representations. In T. Cohn, Y. He, & Y. Liu (Eds.), Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 (pp. 4729–4740). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.425
Dietz, G., & Gillespie, N. (2012). Recovery of trust: Case studies of organisational failures and trust repair (Vol. 5). Institute of Business Ethics London. https://sswm.info/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/DIETZ,%20G.,%20GILLESPIE,%20N.%202012%20The%20Recovery%20of%20Trust%20Case%20Studies%20of%20Organisational%20Failures%20and%20Trust%20Repair.pdf
Fortuin, N. P. M., Schilderman, J. B. A. M., & Venbrux, E. (2019). Worldview commitment and narrative foreclosure among older Dutch adults: Assessing the importance of grand narratives. Journal of Religion, Spirituality & Aging, 31(4), 338–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/15528030.2018.1524339
Fuoli, M., & Paradis, C. (2014). A model of trust-repair discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 74, 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.09.001
Gao, G. (1998). ‘“Don’t take my word for it.”’—Understanding Chinese speaking practicesfn1. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00003-0
Goldman, G. A., & Tselepis, T. (2021). ‘What’s puzzling you is the nature of my game’: What the grand narrative of entrepreneurship doesn’t say. International Entrepreneurship Review, 7(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2021.0701.01
Greenbaum, R. L., Mawritz, M. B., & Piccolo, R. F. (2015). When Leaders Fail to “Walk the Talk”: Supervisor Undermining and Perceptions of Leader Hypocrisy. Journal of Management, 41(3), 929–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312442386
Hahm, C. (2009). Ritual and Constitutionalism: Disputing the Ruler’s Legitimacy in a Confucian Polity. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 57(1), 135–204. https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2008.0005
Hall, E. T. (1989). Beyond culture (Anchor Books ed). Anchor Books.
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper Echelons Theory: An Update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
Hamza, S., & Jarboui, A. (2024). ESG performance and disclosure quality: Does a well-balanced board of directors matter when impression management occurs? EuroMed Journal of Business, 20(3), 698–720. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-05-2023-0140
Herzberg, F. I. (1966). Work and the nature of man. World.
Ho, B. T. E. (2016). About Face—The relational dimension in Chinese IR discourse. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(98), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1075715
Hossain, M., Islam, Md. T., Momin, M. A., Nahar, S., & Alam, Md. S. (2022). Understanding Communication of Sustainability Reporting: Application of Symbolic Convergence Theory (SCT). In K. Martin, K. Shilton, & J. Smith (Eds.), Business and the Ethical Implications of Technology (pp. 257–280). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18794-0_14
Hu, H. C. (1944). THE CHINESE CONCEPTS OF “FACE.” American Anthropologist, 46(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1944.46.1.02a00040
Hu, Y., & Pang, A. (2018). The indigenization of crisis response strategies in the context of China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 11(1), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2017.1305978
Huang, Y.-H., Verma, S. K., Chang, W.-R., Courtney, T. K., Lombardi, D. A., Brennan, M. J., & Perry, M. J. (2012). Management commitment to safety vs. Employee perceived safety training and association with future injury. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 47, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.12.001
Ip, P. K. (2009). Is Confucianism Good for Business Ethics in China? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0120-2
Islam, M. A., Cooper, B. J., Haque, S., & John Jones, M. (2022). Moral versus pragmatic legitimacy and corporate anti-bribery disclosure: Evidence from Australia. Accounting Forum, 46(1), 30–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2021.1925037
Jackson, J. (2018). Norms, Normativity, and the Legitimacy of Justice Institutions: International Perspectives. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14(Volume 14, 2018), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113734
Jiang, T. (2006). Intimate authority: The rule of ritual in classical Confucian political discourse. Confucian Cultures of Authority, 21–47. https://taojiangscholar.com/papers/Intimate_Authority.pdf
Johnson, C., Dowd, T. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Legitimacy as a Social Process. Annual Review of Sociology, 32(Volume 32, 2006), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123101
Kherwa, P., & Bansal, P. (2018). Topic Modeling: A Comprehensive Review. ICST Transactions on Scalable Information Systems, 0(0), 159623. https://doi.org/10/ghzz49
Kirby, J. T. (1991). Aristotle’s “Poetics”: The Rhetorical Principle. Arethusa, 24(2), 197–217. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26309403
K?l?ço?lu, G., & K?l?ço?lu, D. (2024). Organisational integrity and hypocrisy. In Research Handbook on Organisational Integrity (pp. 485–496). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781803927930/book-part-9781803927930-38.xml
Kochkina, N., Macchia, S., & Floris, M. (2024). Strategic Language Use in Sustainability Reporting: An Empirical Study. Sustainability, 16(23), 10229. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310229
Lee, H. (2021). Risk Management: Fundamentals, Theory, and Practice in Asia. Springer Nature.
Li, Z., Haque, S., & Chapple, L. (Ellie). (2023). Disclosures of labour practices: Perspectives of legitimacy and impression management. Journal of Accounting Literature, 45(2), 256–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-06-2022-0069
Lin, Y. (2021). Legitimation strategies in corporate discourse: A comparison of UK and Chinese corporate social responsibility reports. Journal of Pragmatics, 177, 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.009
Lin, Y., Choo, W. C., & Ng, K. Y. (2024). Decoding Sustainability Reporting: Insights from Text Mining and Classification Models for SDGs. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 5(1), e02768. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n01.pe02768
Lister, S. (2003). NGO Legitimacy: Technical Issue or Social Construct? Critique of Anthropology, 23(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X03023002004
Liu, J., Hong, C., & Yook, B. (2025). CEO as “Chief Crisis Officer” under COVID-19: A Content Analysis of CEO Open Letters Using Structural Topic Modeling. In Strategic Communication and the Global Pandemic. Routledge.
Liu, P., & Kwon, J. (2013). The exploration of effects of Chinese cultural values on the attitudes and behaviors of Chinese restaurateurs toward food safety training. Journal of Environmental Health, 75(10), 38–46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26329646
Lourenço, I., Oliveira, J., Castelo Branco, M., & Inácio, A. S. (2025). Institutionally endorsed reputation for CSR leadership and the textual characteristics of CEO letters in CSR reports. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 16(6), 1534–1559. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2024-0345
Lu, Y. (2022). Trust, Truthfulness and Distrust: An Exposition with Confucian Insight. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 56(3), 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-020-09779-6
Lyotard, J.-F., & Brügger, N. (2001). What about the Postmodern? The Concept of the Postmodern in the Work of Lyotard. Yale French Studies, 99, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/2903244
Mahadeo, J. D., Oogarah-Hanuman, V., & Soobaroyen, T. (2011). Changes in social and environmental reporting practices in an emerging economy (2004–2007): Exploring the relevance of stakeholder and legitimacy theories. Accounting Forum, 35(3), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2011.06.005
Mahran, K., & Elamer, A. A. (2025). Navigating the Corporate Ego: Understanding the Association Between ESG Performance and Organizational Narcissistic Rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-06090-x
Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: Symbol or Substance? Organization Science, 25(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0837
McCombs, M. (2005). A Look at Agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500250438
Meijer, M.-M., & Kleinnijenhuis, J. (2006). Issue News and Corporate Reputation: Applying the Theories of Agenda Setting and Issue Ownership in the Field of Business Communication. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00300.x
Messer, C. M., Adams, A. E., & Shriver, T. E. (2012). Corporate Frame Failure and the Erosion of Elite Legitimacy. The Sociological Quarterly, 53(3), 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2012.01238.x
Morefield, J. (2014). Empires Without Imperialism: Anglo-American Decline and the Politics of Deflection. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199387328.001.0001
NeelyJr., B. H., Lovelace, J. B., Cowen, A. P., & Hiller, N. J. (2020). Metacritiques of Upper Echelons Theory: Verdicts and Recommendations for Future Research. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1029–1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320908640
Ortas, E., Álvarez, I., Jaussaud, J., & Garayar, A. (2015). The impact of institutional and social context on corporate environmental, social and governance performance of companies committed to voluntary corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.089
Partner, N. (2021). Postmodernism: “The Crisis of Narratives” and the Historical Discipline. In The Routledge Companion to Historical Theory. Routledge.
Radice, T. (2017). Li (Ritual) in Early Confucianism. Philosophy Compass, 12(10), e12463. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12463
Ragas, M. W. (2013). Agenda-Building and Agenda-Setting Theory: Which Companies We Think About and How We Think About Them. In The Handbook of Communication and Corporate Reputation (pp. 151–165). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118335529.ch15
Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Tingley, D. (2019). stm: An R Package for Structural Topic Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 91(2). https://doi.org/10/ggc8cz
Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S. K., Albertson, B., & Rand, D. G. (2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1064–1082. https://doi.org/10/f6mv8k
?ahin, K. (2015). The legitimacy of codes of corporate governance: Perspectives from developed and emerging economies. Journal of Management & Governance, 19(3), 687–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-014-9289-6
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (Fourth edition). SAGE.
Silvius, R. (2021). China’s Belt and Road Initiative as Nascent World Order Structure and Concept? Between Sino-Centering and Sino-Deflecting. In China’s Big Power Ambition under Xi Jinping. Routledge.
Simons, M. (2022). Jean-François Lyotard and Postmodern Technoscience. Philosophy & Technology, 35(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00517-3
Stephens, K. K., Malone, P. C., & Bailey, C. M. (2005). Communicating with stakeholders During a Crisis: Evaluating Message Strategies. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 42(4), 390–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943605279057
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571. https://doi.org/10/bz9pfj
Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0101
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35
Sung, W. (2020). Xin: Being Trustworthy. International Philosophical Quarterly, 60(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq2020715151
Thompson, G. (2024). Letters as organizational rhetoric on environmental social and governance (ESG): The case of Larry Fink and BlackRock from 2018 to 2023. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 30(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-12-2023-0181
Tost, L. P. (2011). An Integrative Model of Legitimacy Judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686–710. https://doi.org/10/ddjnm2
Tsui, C. (2024). Chinese Business Culture. In Chinese Business Culture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367565152-RECHS111-1
Vaara, E., Aranda, A. M., & Etchanchu, H. (2024). Discursive Legitimation: An Integrative Theoretical Framework and Agenda for Future Research. Journal of Management, 50(6), 2343–2373. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241230511
Valentini, T. (2022). Jean-François Lyotard and the Philosophical Assumptions of Postmodern Democracy. Areté, 7, 705–738. https://doi.org/10.69138/arete-2531-6249-20220730
Wang, L., Demeritt, D., & Rothstein, H. (2023). “Carrying the black pot”: Food safety and risk in China’s reactive regulatory state. Regulation & Governance, 17(2), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12467
Weaver, G. R. (2001). Ethics Programs in Global Businesses: Culture’s Role in Managing Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006475223493
Wei, Z., Miao, D., Chauchat, J.-H., Zhao, R., & Li, W. (2009). N-grams based feature selection and text representation for Chinese Text Classification. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2(4), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2009.9727668
Wenfeng, Q., & Yanyi, W. (2019). jiebaR: Chinese text segmentation (Version 0.11) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=jiebaR
Yang, S. (2003). A Contextual Analysis of Organizational Commitment. Sociological Focus, 36(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2003.10570715
Yin, J., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Institutional Dynamics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in an Emerging Country Context: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1243-4
Yüncü, V. (2020). Organizational Legitimacy: An In-Depth Overview Through The Lens of Institutional Theory. Erciyes Üniversitesi ?ktisadi ve ?dari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 56, 255–278. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.691980
Yu-T’ang, L. (1917). Li: The Chinese Principle of Social Control and Organization. Chinese Soc. & Pol. Sci. Rev., 2, 106. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/chinsoc2§ion=10
Zhang, S., & Zhou, B. (2024). Impact of Mianzi consciousness on unethical pro-organizational behavior: The roles of impression management motive, educational level, party affiliation in China. Current Psychology, 43(16), 14244–14258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05432-0
Zheng, Z. (2015). Dai Zhen’s Criticism and Misunderstanding of Zhu Xi’s Moral Theory. Dao, 14(3), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-015-9454-x
Zhou, L., & Zhang, S. (2017). How face as a system of value-constructs operates through the interplay of mianzi and lian in Chinese: A corpus-based study. Language Sciences, 64, 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.08.001

Yihuan, L., Chong, C. W., Yap, N. K., & Juan, Z. (2025). Grand Narratives, Grim Realities? ESG Rhetoric and Legitimacy Management in the Taiwanese Food Industry. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(12), 1244–1265.