ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Technology literacy has become a core requirement for vocational graduates as industries continue to adopt digital, automated, and data-driven systems. In Malaysian vocational colleges, the Final Year Project (PTA) is intended to serve as an authentic platform for applying technical knowledge; however, its existing structure provides limited guidance on integrating inquiry processes that cultivate technology literacy. This systematic literature review synthesises 36 peer-reviewed studies published between 2021 and 2025 to examine how technology literacy is conceptualised, how Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) supports its development, and how current PTA practices align with research-based recommendations. Guided by PRISMA procedures, studies were identified through Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and Google Scholar, and analysed thematically. Five themes emerged: pedagogical approaches and IBL models, development of technology literacy, assessment and measurement, challenges and barriers, and strategies and best practices. The review demonstrates that IBL significantly enhances students’ digital competence, inquiry reasoning, and reflective technological understanding. However, gaps remain in PTA documentation, assessment coherence, and institutional readiness for IBL implementation. The findings offer evidence-based direction for strengthening inquiry-oriented project design and better aligning vocational education with the technological competencies required in IR4.0 environments.
Abd Karim, R., & Mustapha, R. (2022). TVET students’ perception on digital mind map to stimulate learning of technical skills in Malaysia. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 14(1), 1–13.
Abdul Rabu, S., Mohamad, S., Awwad, S., Asmak Ismail, N., & Yeen, K. (2023). Effectiveness of inquiry-based learning with the aid of BLOSSOMS video on students’ performance and motivation. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 11469–11494.
Amiron, E., Latib, A. A., & Subari, K. (2019). Industry Revolution 4.0 skills and enablers in technical and vocational education and training curriculum. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(1C2), 484–490.
Arifin, Z., Sukarmin, Saputro, S., & Kamari, A. (2025). The effect of inquiry-based learning on students’ critical thinking skills in science education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), 1–24.
Barragán-Pulido, S., Barragán-Pulido, M., Alonso-Hernández, J., & Castro-Sánchez, J. (2023). Development of students’ skills through gamification and serious games: An exploratory study. Applied Sciences, 13, 1–16.
Bekbayeva, Z., Galiyev, T., Albytova, N., & Zhazykbayeva, Z. (2021). Fostering post-secondary vocational students’ critical thinking through multi-level tasks in learning environments. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13(3), 397–406.
Bödding, R., Bentler, D., & Maier, G. (2023). Augmented reality for constructivist learning at work: Current perspectives and future applications. In Learning and Work (pp. 323–334). Springer.
Calister, L., Attah, B., & Eze, E. (2023). Awareness and utilization of e-learning technologies among vocational and technical education students. International Journal of Home Economics, Hospitality and Allied Research, 4(2), 149–161.
Chakerian, A., & Ramakrishnan, C. (2025). Integrating inquiry-based learning pedagogy in information technology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Education (pp. 860–867).
Cigdem, H., & Ozkan, U. (2022). Are vocational college students ready for online learning in post-COVID instruction? Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 5(3), 432–442.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Elena, T., & Raitskaya, L. (2023). Education 4.0: The concept, skills, and research. Journal of Language & Education, 9(1), 5–11.
Gaba, A., Bhushan, B., & Rao, D. K. (2021). Factors influencing the preference of distance learners to study online during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 194–206.
Gottfried, M., Freeman, J., Odle, T., Plasman, J., Klasik, D., & Dougherty, S. (2023). Does high school STEM career coursework align with college employment? SAGE Open, 13(1), 207–236.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
Huba, M., & Bisták, P. (2021). PocketLab: Next step to learning, experimenting, and discovering in COVID time. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (pp. 182–186).
Jessica, C., Emmerson, M., & Richard, G. (2024). Inquiry-based learning as an adaptive signature pedagogy in international relations. International Studies Perspectives, 25(2), 308–324.
Korakis, K., & Dossis, M. (2023). Technician of refrigeration, ventilation, and air conditioning installations: A new approach of the modern curricula in the mechanical sector of the vocational school. In Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Social Media Conference (pp. 1–6).
KPM BPLTV-PTA. (2023). Garis Panduan Projek Tahun Akhir. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Luckin, R. (2025). Nurturing human intelligence in the age of AI: Rethinking education for the future. Development and Learning in Organizations, 1–4.
Luo, F., Chano, J., & Chen, H. (2024). Designing an instructional model to improve reading abilities of technical documents and learning attitudes for vocational students in China. International Journal of Language Education, 6(2), 384–406.
Lupión-Cobos, T., Girón-Gambero, J., & García-Ruiz, C. (2022). Building STEM inquiry-based teaching proposals through collaborations between schools and research centres: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 900–915.
Madimabe, M., & Omodan, B. (2021). Investigating the effects of e-learning as a method of curriculum dissemination for rural TVET college students. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 6(3), 82–92.
Meng, F., & Jumaat, N. (2024). The effectiveness of an online inquiry-based learning environment towards students’ behavioural engagement and performance in science. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(3), 112–124.
Mohammad Hussain, M., Ahmat Zainuri, N., Mohd Zulkifli, R., & Abdul Rahman, A. (2023). Effect of an inquiry-based blended learning module on electronics technology students’ academic achievement. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 15(2), 21–32.
Mutiaraningrum, I., Fitriati, S., Yuliasri, I., & Saleh, M. (2024). From classroom projects to business ideas: Indonesian vocational college students’ entrepreneurial skills. Issues in Educational Research, 34(2), 608–627.
Ng, O.-L., & Tsang, W. (2022). Constructionist learning in school mathematics: Implications for education in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(4), 328–339.
Nong, L., Liao, C., Ye, J.-H., Wei, C., Zhao, C., & Nong, W. (2022). The STEAM learning performance and sustainable inquiry behaviour of college students in China. Educational Psychology, 42(1), 1–14.
Nurulwahida, A., Abdul Hamid, B., Md-Ali, R., Zaharah, C., Yee, M., & Tee, T. (2024). Curriculum key-players’ and industries’ thoughts: The relevance of automotive case-based simulation apps. SAGE Open, 14(2), 2–21.
Onat, O., & Bertiz, Y. (2023). The effects of instant messages on distance education students’ perception of transactional distance. International Journal of Technology in Education, 6(1), 69–83.
Ozkale, A., & Erdogan, E. (2023). Number system conversion in spreadsheet for vocational school students: A case study from instrumental genesis. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 7(2), 275–298.
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory (G. Gellerier & J. Langer, Trans.). In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, 3rd ed.). Wiley.
Rafiq, A., Triyono, M., & Djatmiko, I. (2022). Enhancing student engagement in vocational education by using virtual reality. Waikato Journal of Education, 27(1), 175–188.
Rafiq, A., Triyono, M., & Djatmiko, I. (2023). The integration of inquiry and problem-based learning and its impact on increasing vocational student involvement. International Journal of Instruction, 16(4), 660–684.
Razali, S., Ismail, A., Yazid, F., Ahmad, M., Hashim, S., Rohanai, R., & Shafieek, M. (2023). TVET in the 21st century: Exploring multimedia elements in digital teaching and learning based on art content. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 15(3), 9–19.
Sam, R. (2024). Systematic review of inquiry-based learning: assessing impact and best practices in education. F1000Research, 1-12.
Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson.
Suhaini, M., Ahmad, A., & Mohd Bohari, N. (2021). Assessments on vocational knowledge and skills: A content validity analysis. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1529–1540.
Tikhonova, E., & Raitskaya, L. (2023). Education 4.0: The concept, skills, and research. Journal of Language & Education, 9(1), 5–11.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, X. M., Wang, J. L., Xu, S. Y., & Si Jie, X. (2025). Concept mapping in STEM education: A meta-analysis of its impact on students’ achievement. International Journal of STEM Education, 12(1), 1–20.
Wuxue, J. (2023). The influence of optimized blended learning mode on learning effectiveness for higher vocational college students: A quasi-experimental study. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 22(2), 121–130.
Hijaz, M. A. A. M., Noh@Seth, N. H., & Oh, Z. J. (2025). Technology Literacy, Inquiry-Based Learning, and Final Year Projects in Malaysian Vocational Education: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(12), 819–838.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode