ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Heritage sites are increasingly adopting information visualisations to communicate complex scientific knowledge, such as paleontological, archaeological, and ecological content, to diverse public audiences. Despite this trend, there remains a lack of structured guidance for collaborative design processes that involve scientists, designers, and educators, often leading to visualisations that prioritise either scientific accuracy or aesthetic appeal at the expense of audience comprehension. This paper addresses this gap by proposing a simplified co-design framework derived from semi-structured interviews with experts in palaeontology, museum education, and visual design. The framework outlines five key phases: goal articulation, stakeholder mapping, prototype visualisation, iterative user feedback and refinement, and public deployment. Emphasis is placed on cognitive accessibility, incorporating strategies such as scaffolding, visual metaphors, clear hierarchical structures, and multilingual support. By integrating participatory collaboration with audience-centred design principles, the proposed model provides a practical guide for heritage institutions seeking to optimise both comprehension and engagement in scientific visualisations.
Bruno, E. V., & Tagliasco, G. (2022). Body and Interaction in Dematerialisation. Exploring Tomás Maldonado, 212.
Butdisuwan, S., Kataria, S., Taj, A., & Subaveerapandiyan, A. (2024). Visualising knowledge: a survey of infographic perceptions and challenges in academic library settings. Library Management, 45(5), 317-330.
Kerr, J., Whelan, M., Zelenko, O., Harper-Hill, K., & Villalba, C. (2022). Integrated Co-design: A Model for Co-designing with Multiple Stakeholder Groups from the'Fuzzy'Front-end to Beyond Project Delivery. International Journal of Design, 16(2), 75-90.
Li, W., Yu, J., Zhang, Z., & Liu, X. (2022). Dual coding or cognitive load? Exploring the effect of multimodal input on English as a foreign language learners’ vocabulary learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 834706.
Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199-229.
Lin, C., Xia, G., Nickpour, F., & Chen, Y. (2025). A review of emotional design in extended reality for the preservation of culture heritage. npj Heritage Science, 13(1), 86.
Lo Duca, A., & McDowell, K. (2025). Using the S?DIKW framework to transform data visualization into data storytelling. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 76(5), 803-818.
Maier, M. (2025). The Role of Graphic Design in Educational Projects: Enhancing Learning Effectiveness Through Visual Elements. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 14(01), 15-22.
Massari, F. S., Del Vecchio, P., & Degl'Innocenti, E. (2024). Past for Future–museums as a digitalized “interaction platform” for value co-creation in tourism destinations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(5), 1453-1474.
Meylani, R. (2024). Innovations with schema theory: Modern implications for learning, memory, and academic achievement. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(1), 2582-2160.
Panteli, A., Kalaitzi, E., & Fidas, C. A. (2025). Identifying Individual Information Processing Styles During Advertisement Viewing Through EEG-Driven Classifiers. Information, 16(9), 757.
Shifrina-Piljovin, Y. (2025). Exploring Language Through Systemic Functional Linguistics: Importance of communicating and developing academic language for multilingual learners. Journal of English Learner Education, 17(2), 2.
Sin, J., Munteanu, C., Nixon, M., Pandeliev, V., Tigwell, G. W., Shinohara, K., ... & Szigeti, S. (2022). Uncovering inclusivity gaps in design pedagogy through the digital design marginalization framework. Frontiers in Computer Science, 4, 822090.
Sweller, J. (2022). The role of evolutionary psychology in our understanding of human cognition: Consequences for cognitive load theory and instructional procedures. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 2229-2241.
Tinoca, L., Piedade, J., Santos, S., Pedro, A., & Gomes, S. (2022). Design-based research in the educational field: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 12(6), 410.
Wang, S., Menon, S., Li, D., Ma, X., Zemel, R., & Chilton, L. B. (2025). Schemex: Interactive Structural Abstraction from Examples with Contrastive Refinement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.11795.
Worsley, M., & Bar-El, D. (2022). Inclusive Making: designing tools and experiences to promote accessibility and redefine making. Computer Science Education, 32(2), 155-187.
Xu, C., Sun, Y., & Zhou, H. (2025). Artificial aesthetics and ethical ambiguity: exploring business ethics in the context of AI-driven creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 199(4), 671-692.
Wenjuan, D., Yusof, M. J. M., & Beng, N. S. (2025). Towards a Framework for Collaborative Design of Science Visualisations in Heritage Contexts. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(12), 886–893.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode