ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
As the world’s second-largest economy with strong state leadership, China plays a pivotal role in global sustainability. Yet, ESG development remains constrained by a lack of theory-driven research suited to its institutional context. This study proposes a localized, policy-oriented ESG framework. Based on a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling of ESG policy documents (2014-2024), we identify key theories and map them onto China’s three-stage ESG policy evolution. The resulting framework offers theoretical and methodological guidance for China and provides insights for ESG localization in other emerging markets, highlighting China’s potential in ESG innovation and global governance.
Ahmed, A., Tessema, A., & Hussain, A. (2024). Empowering change: The role of gender diversity in steering ESG integration into executive compensation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(6), 6044–6060.
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Jan), 993–1022.
Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118829.
Dong, Z., Wu, H., Jia, Z., Li, X., & Pan, Y. (2024). Research on China’s ESG policy exploration and practical progress. China Environmental Management, 1(01), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2024.01.009
Hammersley, M. (2002). Educational research, policymaking, and practice. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
He, Y., Li, J., & Ren, Y. (2024). Digital transformation and corporate ESG information disclosure herd effect. Finance Research Letters, 65, 105557.
He, Y. T. (2023). Current status and future prospects of Chinese enterprise ESG ratings. Heilongjiang Finance, 0(12), 32–35.
Hu, J., Han, Y., & Zhong, Y. (2023). How does corporate digital transformation affect ESG performance? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Industrial Economics Review, 1(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.19313/j.cnki.cn10-1223/f.20221104.001
Huang, S. Z. (2021). The three theoretical pillars supporting ESG. Accounting Monthly, 0(19), 3–10.
Kumar, P., & Firoz, M. (2022). Does accounting-based financial performance value environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures? A detailed note on a corporate sustainability perspective. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 16(1), 67–85.
Li, P., Zhu, J., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Analysis of ESG information-disclosure strategies considering different risk-appetite investors. Journal of Management Analytics, 11(3), 495–517.
Liu, M. (2022). Quantitative ESG disclosure and divergence of ESG ratings. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 936798.
Moussa, A. S., Elmarzouky, M., & Shohaieb, D. (2024). Green governance: How ESG initiatives drive financial performance in UK firms? Sustainability, 16(24), 10894.
Ni, K., Zhang, R., Tan, L., & Lai, X. (2024). How ESG enhances corporate competitiveness: Mechanisms and evidence. Finance Research Letters, 69, 106249.
Son, E., & Suh, J. (2024). The role of entrepreneurship in alleviating ESG backlash and advancing sustainability. Journal of the International Council for Small Business, 1–19.
Tang, D., & Jin, X. (2023). ESG investor behavior and related research frontiers in the context of carbon neutrality: A review and extension. Economic Research Journal, 58(9), 190–208.
Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2014). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods. Routledge.
Wang, Y., & Xie, M. (2022). The impact of ESG information disclosure on corporate financing costs: Empirical evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies. Nankai Economic Studies, 11(11), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.14116/j.nkes.2022.11.005
Xing, Y. (2017). Theoretical framework, international trends, and China’s strategies for responsible investment. The Economist, 9(09), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.16158/j.cnki.51-1312/f.2017.09.007
Zeng, Y., Wang, Y., & Wu, Z. (2024). ESG rating discrepancies and corporate green innovation: Empirical evidence from China’s A-share listed companies. Soft Science, 2024, 1–11.
Zhang, E., & Cai, J. (2023). The embedding mechanism and construction path of the ESG system in the context of China’s development. Southeast Academic Research, 1(01), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.13658/j.cnki.sar.2023.01.013
Zhang, Y., Sun, Z., Sheng, A., Zhang, L., & Kan, Y. (2024). Can green technology mergers and acquisitions enhance sustainable development? Evidence from ESG ratings. Sustainable Development, 32(6), 6072–6087.
Liu, Y., Hashim, H. I. B. C., & Yusoff, M. E. Bin. (2025). Localizing ESG Theory in China: Policy Evolution and a Four-Tier Theoretical Framework. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(12), 1718–1730.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode