ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Quiet but underperforming learners often remain overlooked in traditional classrooms, where verbal participation is frequently equated with understanding and academic competence. Although these students may possess strong internal reasoning skills, their hesitance to speak, fear of judgment, and limited confidence can be misinterpreted as disengagement or weak ability (Cain, 2012). Recognizing the need to understand and support this learner group, this study investigates how targeted instructional strategies can foster cognitive awakening through which learners become more aware of their thinking, more confident in expressing ideas, and more engaged in reflective learning. Using a mixed-methods research design (Creswell & Clark, 2017), this study integrates both quantitative measures (pre- and post-tests, engagement surveys) and qualitative insights (interviews, observations, teacher reflections) to examine the effects of strategies such as Silent Discussion, Mind Mapping, Gamification, and Personalized Support on quiet underachievers. Findings indicate that when teachers provide low-anxiety, student-centered environments grounded in constructivist principles (Vygotsky, 1978), quiet learners demonstrate significant growth in higher-order thinking, conceptual understanding, motivation, and self-confidence. Cognitive awakening, therefore, is not merely about improving academic scores; rather, it involves empowering students to understand their own thought processes, develop their voice, and engage meaningfully in learning. This study highlights the teacher’s role in designing emotionally safe, intellectually stimulating classrooms where diverse thinking styles are valued, and where quiet learners can realize their full potential.
Bell, K. E. (2021). Breaking down barriers: Practicing silent discussions in the classroom. Virginia English Journal, 71(2), 6.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longmans, Green.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cain, S. (2012). Quiet: The power of introverts in a world that can't stop talking. Crown Publishers.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th Ed.). SAGE publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th Ed.). SAGE publications.
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review. International Journal of Education Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Ivankova, N. V., & Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mixed methods applications in action research: From methods to community action. SAGE Publications.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Mertler, C. A. (2019). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mirza, H., Bellalem, F., & Mirza, C. (2023). Ethical considerations in qualitatives research: Summary guidelines for novice social science researchers. Social Studies and Research Journal, 11(1), 441-449.
Mokhtar, M. A. M., & Rahelan, A. N. A. (2024). The use of gaming tools on students to improve vocabulary mastery in the classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i9/22741
Pham, H. L. (2012). Differentiated instruction and the need to integrate teaching and practice. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 9(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v9i1.6684
Pllana, D. (2021). Combining teaching strategies, learning strategies, and elements of super learning principles. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 8(6), 288-301. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.86.10339
Taherdoost, H. (2022). What are different research approaches? Comprehensive review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research, their applications, types, and limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53-63.
Tanner, K. D. (2013). Structure matters: Twenty-one teaching strategies to promote student engagement and cultivate classroom equity. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-06-0115
Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley-Blackwell.
Vorona-Slivinskaya, L., Bokov, D., & Li, O. (2020). Visualization of learning and memorizing processes using mobile devices: Mind mapping and charting.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, Y., Wei, X., Liu, Y., & Chiu, T. (2022). A mixed-methods approach for assessing student learning gains in English Listening Comprehension. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 27, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.7275/8s7x-8w51
Wentzel, K. & Brophy, J. E. (2014). Motivating students to learn, 4th edition. Motivating Students To Learn, 4th Edition. 1-301. 10.4324/9780203108017.
Zhang, L. F. (2017). Learning styles and preferences: How to teach students with different thinking styles. Educational Psychology, 37(4), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1202902
Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299-315). Routledge.
Mohd Mokhtar, M. A., Zari, N. B., Julhassan, N. I., Eleas, N. H., & Mohd Ariffin, N. F. (2025). Cognitive Awakening: Fostering Deeper Thinking in Quiet but Underperforming Learners. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(12), 2298–2309.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode