ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Over the past two decades, higher education systems worldwide have undergone radical neoliberal governance reforms centered on accountability, performance metrics, and audit culture. While these reforms are ostensibly designed to boost institutional efficiency and transparency, they have consistently triggered widespread faculty resistance and inflicted profound, yet understudied, psychological burdens on academic staff—including burnout, identity strain, and emotional exhaustion. As higher education grapples with sustaining academic vitality and faculty well-being amid relentless structural change, understanding the interplay between university governance, faculty resistance, and psychological costs has become an urgent global imperative. This study represents the first comprehensive global bibliometric mapping of scholarship at the intersection of these three critical domains. Drawing on 48 core Scopus-indexed publications (2000–2025), we deploy rigorous science-mapping techniques—co-occurrence networks, thematic clustering, and longitudinal evolutionary analysis—to systematically clarify the intellectual foundations, conceptual trajectory, and emerging research frontiers of the field. Our findings reveal a pivotal shift in the scholarship: from early structural debates about managerialism to a nuanced "emotional turn" that centers identity strain, emotional labor, and psychological sustainability. Governance and accountability mechanisms emerge as the structural core driving faculty resistance, which we frame not as mere organizational obstruction but as a vital form of professional agency. Additionally, we identify datafication and digital governance as fast-emerging forces amplifying psychological strain among faculty. We further map key global research hubs in the United States, Brazil, Australia, and the United Kingdom, while highlighting persistent disciplinary fragmentation that limits cross-contextual insight. Concluding, we propose a targeted research agenda for advancing the psychological sustainability of institutional change in higher education, with a focus on leadership models that prioritize emotional intelligence, professional autonomy, and human-centered governance. This study delivers actionable insights for policymakers, university leaders, and academic researchers, filling a critical gap in the global understanding of how governance reforms shape the emotional and professional lives of the faculty who form the backbone of higher education.
Abers, R., & Keck, M.E. (2009). Mobilizing the state: The erratic partner in Brazil's participatory water policy. Politics and Society, 37(2), 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329209334003
Alaqeel, A.S. (2024). Examining self-efficacy and anxiety in data-driven decision-making practices among learning disabilities teachers in Saudi Arabia: A mixed-methods study. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2434775
Banerjee, Y., Tuffnell, C., & Alkhadragy, R. (2019). Mento's change model in teaching competency-based medical education. BMC Medical Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1896-0
Berlemann, M., & Haucap, J. (2015). Which factors drive the decision to opt out of individual research rankings? An empirical study of academic resistance to change. Research Policy, 44(5), 1108–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.002
Bonollo, E. (2022). Negative effects of the adoption of accrual accounting in the public sector: a systematic literature review and future prospects. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 35(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-03-2021-0067
Cannizzo, F. (2018). 'You've got to love what you do': Academic labour in a culture of authenticity. Sociological Review, 66(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026116681439
Chaudhuri, L.A., Sahoo, K., & Bhattacharya, S. (2024). From Founder to Successor: Managing Organizational Change at Sanman. Journal of Organizational Behavior Education, 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518241234567
Crow, G.M., & Weindling, D. (2010). Learning to be political: New English headteachers' roles. Educational Policy, 24(1), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904809354495
Curto-Rodríguez, R., Marcos-Sánchez, R., & Ferrández, D. (2024). Open Government in Spain: An Introspective Analysis. Administrative Sciences, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14050200
Duarte, F.D.P. (2015). Barriers to Sustainability: An Exploratory Study on Perspectives from Brazilian Organizations. Sustainable Development, 23(6), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1586
Edwards, J.R. (2023). Cash to accruals accounting in British central government: A journey through time. Financial Accountability and Management, 39(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/fam.12612
Faller, N.L. (2024). Analysis on political, Social, and technical characteristics of e-governance in Eastern Visayas, Philippines. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(12), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738947.2024.2345678
Gao, H., & Tyson, A.D. (2018). Power List Reform: A New Constraint Mechanism for Administrative Powers in China. Asian Studies Review, 42(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2017.1398765
Gardenal, F. (2013). A model to measure e-procurement impacts on organizational performance. Journal of Public Procurement, 13(2), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/14719061311328782
Grenny, J., & Pound, R. (2010). How to 10×your influence: use four or more sources to exponentially increase your influence. Strategic Direction, 26(4), 23–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/02580541011043563
Guhn, M. (2009). Insights from successful and unsuccessful implementations of school reform programs. Journal of Educational Change, 10(4), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9102-8
Hara, M., & Sherbine, K. (2018). Be[com]ing a teacher in neoliberal times: The possibilities of visioning for resistance in teacher education. Policy Futures in Education, 16(6), 669–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210318758814
Ho, L.K.K. (2020). Rethinking police legitimacy in postcolonial Hong Kong: Paramilitary policing in protest management. Policing (Oxford), 14(4), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1093/policing/paaa023
Howell, C.L., Cortado, A.P., & Unver, O.I. (2023). Stakeholder Engagement and Perceptions on Water Governance and Water Management in Azerbaijan. Water (Switzerland), 15(12), 2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15122234
Jermias, J., & Hoi Hu, B.K. (2020). Overconfidence and Resistance to Abandoning Unprofitable Capital Budgeting Projects: The Effects of Autonomy, Internal Audit, and Accountability. Accounting Perspectives, 19(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/acpe.12456
Johnson, M., & Watt, L. (2022). Doing the right thing? An institutional perspective on responsible restructuring in UK local government. Human Resource Management Journal, 32(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12345
Kerins, J., Smith, S.E., Stirling, S.A., Wakeling, J., & Tallentire, V.R. (2021). Transfer of training from an internal medicine boot camp to the workplace: enhancing and hindering factors. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 345. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02789-x
Khan, A.N., Shahzad, K., & Khan, N.A. (2024). Fostering accountability through digital transformation: leadership's role in enhancing techno-work engagement in public sector. Public Money and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2024.2324567
Kim, K.T. (2010). "Panoptic" accountability: Supervisory leaders and normalizing or resisting professionals. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 7(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.117
Krenn, M. (2017). Competing institutional pressures in corporate governance reform: the role of board interlocks and industry peers. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 17(3), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2016-0157
Mansouri, A., & Belhaj, I. (2024). Exploring the influence of e-governance on family business strategy execution; Exploración de la influencia de la gobernanza electrónica en la ejecución de la estrategia de las empresas familiares. Data and Metadata, 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2024.2345678
Munir, R., Baird, K.M., & Perera, S. (2013). Performance measurement system change in an emerging economy bank. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 26(2), 234–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571311312345
Perry-Hazan, L., Finefter-Rosenbluh, I., & Muzikovskaya, E. (2021). Secular teachers in Jewish religious schools: passing, resistance, and freedom of religion. Oxford Review of Education, 47(4), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1789012
Rodriguez-Galindo, R., Yasnó-Triana, C., Ultreras-Rodríguez, A., Nieves-Lizárraga, D.O., Osuna-Velarde, D.V., Chávez-Hernández, A., Campos-Sánchez, S.T., Salazar-Moran, A.L., Espinoza-Vásquez, G., Rengifo Lozano, R.A., Moreira-Cantos, P.S., Fuentes-Rosas, L., & Rincón-Guio, C. (2024). Enhancing financial transparency in non-profit organisations: Challenges and integration of IFRS for SMEs, IFR4NPO, and GRI standards. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(11), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIPD-03-2024-0015
Tolo, A., Lillejord, S., Flórez Petour, M.T., & Hopfenbeck, T.N. (2020). Intelligent accountability in schools: A study of how school leaders work with the implementation of assessment for learning. Journal of Educational Change, 21(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09456-x
Trumbach, C.C., Payne, D.M., & Lundberg, O. (2020). Change management principles for the higher education environment. International Journal of Educational Organization and Leadership, 28(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEOL-06-2019-0034
Valuckas, D. (2019). Budgeting reconsidered: exploring change initiative in a bank. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 15(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-03-2018-0023
Zaidi, S.Y.A., & Jamshed, S. (2023). Leadership in developing countries: The untold story of seth leadership. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 42(4), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22123
Zhang, W., & Rashdi, O. (2026). Global Bibliometric Mapping of Faculty Resistance to Change in Higher Education: Uncovering the Psychological Costs of University Governance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 16(3), 622–643.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode