ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Traditional Museum spaces (TMS) remain vital for conserving and communicating cultural heritage, yet static interpretation can limit visitor engagement and flexible service delivery. This study investigates how an AR-enabled digital visitor service supports visitor-centered digital transformation in TMS and identifies key factors shaping visitors’ overall evaluation of the experience. A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted on-site at the Life Evolution Hall of the Geological Museum of Guilin University of Technology (China). Using systematic intercept sampling, 418 valid visitor responses were collected immediately after the visit. Data were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics, including reliability and validity screening, Pearson correlation analysis and multiple regression modelling. Overall evaluation (OVE) was measured by Q8 as the dependent variable. The results show that visitors generally reported positive perceptions of the AR-enabled service. Multiple regression indicated that OVE is significantly influenced by both utilitarian perceptions and experiential engagement. Functional usefulness emerged as the strongest determinant of OVE, while interactivity, immersion, information accessibility and enjoyment also showed significant positive effects. Perceived ease of use did not demonstrate a significant direct effect in the final model. This study provides management-oriented evidence to guide sustainable digital transformation in traditional museum environments. The findings suggest that museums should prioritize functional interpretive value alongside immersive and interactive experience design when deploying AR-enabled visitor services, rather than focusing primarily on technological novelty or content volume.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2016). The museum experience revisited. Routledge.
Han, D. I., Jung, T., & Gibson, A. (2019). Dublin AR: Implementing augmented reality in heritage tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives, 30, 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.02.006
Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1086/208906
Jung, T., tom Dieck, M. C., Lee, H., & Chung, N. (2016). Effects of virtual reality and augmented reality on visitor experiences in tourism. Information & Management, 54(3), 1–12.
Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
Marty, P. F. (2008). Museum websites and museum visitors: Digital museum resources and their use. Museum Management and Curatorship, 23(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770701865410
McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J. S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673674
Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y. F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing Science, 19(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.19.1.22.15184
Parry, R. (2007). Recoding the museum: Digital heritage and the technologies of change. Routledge.
Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy: Work is theatre and every business a stage. Harvard Business School Press.
Rese, A., Schreiber, S., & Baier, D. (2017). Technology acceptance modeling of augmented reality applications: A consumer perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.046
Russo, A., Watkins, J., Kelly, L., & Chan, S. (2008). Participatory communication with social media. Curator: The Museum Journal, 51(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2008.tb00288.x
Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
tom Dieck, M. C., & Jung, T. (2017). Value of augmented reality at cultural heritage sites: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 6(2), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.03.002
Van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148660
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Yovcheva, Z., Buhalis, D., & Gatzidis, C. (2014). Empirical evaluation of smartphone augmented reality applications for cultural heritage tourism. Tourism Management, 41, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.08.005
Shi, Y., Ghafar, M. B. A., & Yahaya, M. F. (2026). Visitor-Centered Digital Transformation in Traditional Museum Spaces: Evidence from an AR-Enabled Digital Visitor Service in China. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 16(3), 399-410.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode