ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Accounting information comparability is an important dimension of financial reporting quality because it helps investors and other users compare firm performance under similar economic conditions. Prior research mainly explains differences in accounting information comparability from firm-level factors such as corporate governance, disclosure quality, and audit monitoring. However, firms operate in different institutional environments, and these external conditions may influence how managers interpret and apply accounting standards. In the Chinese capital market, listed firms follow unified accounting standards but operate in regions with different levels of market development and regulatory enforcement. Despite growing research on regional institutional environments, limited evidence exists on whether regional differences affect the comparability of financial reporting across firms. The purpose of this study is therefore to examine how regional differences influence accounting information comparability and whether this relationship varies over time and across regions. Using panel data of non-financial A-share listed firms in China from 2000 to 2024, this study measures accounting information comparability following the approach proposed by De Franco et al. (2011). Regional differences are defined based on firms’ registered provinces and classified into eastern, central, and western regions. Panel regression models with industry and year fixed effects are used to test the hypotheses. The results show that firms located outside the eastern region have significantly lower accounting information comparability. Further analysis indicates that this relationship changes over time and differs across regions. These findings suggest that regional institutional environments influence the consistency of accounting practices across firms. This study contributes to the literature by linking regional institutional environments with accounting information comparability and by providing new evidence from an emerging market. The findings also suggest that improving institutional conditions may help promote more consistent financial reporting across regions.
De Franco, G., Kothari, S. P., & Verdi, R. S. (2011). The benefits of financial statement comparability. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(4), 895–931.
Francis, J. R., Pinnuck, M., & Watanabe, O. (2014). Auditor style and financial statement comparability. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 605–633.
Kim, J. B., Kraft, P., & Ryan, S. G. (2016). Financial statement comparability and credit risk. Review of Accounting Studies, 21(2), 532–565.
Fan, J. P. H., Wang, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2011). Institutions and organizational structure: The case of state-owned corporate pyramids. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 27(3), 467–496.
Ye, C., Chen, G., & Wang, X. (2020). Regional culture, accounting information quality, and audit opinions. Journal of Nanjing Audit University, 17(5), 1–8.
Gao, C. (2023). Social trust and audit fees: Evidence from China. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 21, 39–42.
Zeng, Y. (2023). Regional institutional environment, accounting information quality and audit fees. Friends of Accounting, 12, 44–53.
Li, Z., & Zhu, J. (2021). Tax enforcement and accounting information quality. Finance and Trade Research, 32(6), 77–89.
Liu, J., & Shen, Y. (2021). Regulatory inspection and audit pricing. Audit Research, 4, 92–101.
Guo, X., & Ma, J. (2024). Environmental regulation and accounting information quality. Accounting Research, 2, 88–97.
Shen, L., & Wang, H. (2024). Local protectionism and audit behavior. Audit Research, 1, 55–66.
Chai, J., & Bosi, M. K. (2026). The Impact of Regional Differences on Accounting Information Comparability: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 16(3), 1761–1774.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode