ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The widespread adoption of blended learning in higher education has reshaped English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction in China, yet its effectiveness in improving academic achievement remains inconsistent. Increasingly, research suggests that technological integration alone is insufficient to account for learning outcomes, highlighting the need to examine learners’ internal psychological processes. This study investigates the psychological mechanism underlying English achievement in blended university EFL classrooms by integrating student-related factors, teacher-related factors, and flow experience within a unified quantitative framework. Using a cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 640 non-English-major undergraduate students enrolled in blended College English courses at Chinese universities. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to examine the direct and indirect relationships among the study variables, with English achievement operationalized through College English Test Band 4 (CET-4) scores. The results indicate that flow experience is the strongest direct predictor of English achievement. In contrast, student-related factors and teacher-related factors do not exert significant direct effects on CET-4 performance when flow experience is taken into account. Mediation analysis further reveals that flow experience fully mediates the relationships between both student-related and teacher-related factors and English achievement. These findings suggest that English achievement in blended EFL contexts is primarily driven by learners’ psychological engagement rather than by instructional or individual conditions alone. By empirically validating flow experience as a central psychological mechanism linking learning conditions to academic outcomes, this study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of blended learning effectiveness. The findings also offer practical implications for the design and evaluation of blended English instruction in higher education, emphasizing the importance of fostering sustained engagement, concentration, and learner control to enhance academic performance.
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), Article 2, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Chen, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2021). Detecting cognitive engagement in blended learning environments: A learning analytics approach. Educational Technology & Society, 24(2), 1–15.
Dewaele, J.-M., & Li, C. (2022). Foreign language enjoyment and anxiety: Associations with learners’ self-perceptions and achievement. System, 105, 102720, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102720
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.).
Keller, M. M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. E. (2021). Teacher enthusiasm and students’ emotional engagement: Evidence from classroom research. Learning and Instruction, 74, 101435, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101435
Li, Y., & Cheung, K. C. (2023). Blended learning in tertiary EFL education: Effects on achievement and learner perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(5–6), 935–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1847353
Liu, M., & Huang, W. (2022). Student engagement in blended EFL courses: Challenges and pedagogical implications. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(6), 617–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00663-z
Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q., Nakata, Y., Parker, P., & Ryan, R. M. (2022). Motivating language learners: A longitudinal model of engagement and achievement. Language Learning, 72(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12480
Piniel, K., & Albert, Á. (2022). Advanced language learners’ flow experiences in classroom activities. System, 104, 102680, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102680
Shao, K., Nicholson, L. J., Kutuk, G., & Lei, F. (2024). Emotions and achievement in second language learning: A meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 46(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263123000616
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2020). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). Wiley.
Teimouri, Y., Goetze, J., & Plonsky, L. (2023). Second language anxiety and achievement: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(2), 304–335. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226312200035X
Wang, Y. (2022). Teacher predictability, classroom emotions, and student engagement in EFL instruction. System, 106, 102762, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102762
Wang, Y., & Han, X. (2024). Students’ perceptions of blended EFL learning: Technology acceptance and learning outcomes. ReCALL, 36(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000321
Zhang, R., & Zhu, C. (2022). Understanding student engagement in blended learning environments: A multidimensional perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(5), 2635–2654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10131-9
Jing, L., & Tahir, S. R. (2026). Reframing English Achievement in Blended Learning: Flow Experience as the Core Psychological Mechanism in Chinese University EFL Classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 16(4), 806-819.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode