ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Afghanistan occupies a distinctive geographical position at the intersection of Central Asia, South Asia, West Asia and the wider Eurasian region. Although its landlocked geography has traditionally been regarded as a structural disadvantage associated with high transportation costs, dependence on neighbouring transit countries and restricted access to international markets, its location simultaneously provides significant potential for regional economic connectivity. Afghanistan's participation in multiple regional cooperation frameworks—including the Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO), the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), and the Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC) Program—offers an important institutional basis for transforming this geographical position into economic opportunity. However, existing scholarship remains fragmented across separate literatures on South Asian regionalism, Central Asian connectivity, infrastructure development, energy cooperation and Afghanistan's post-conflict reconstruction. This study therefore undertakes an integrative literature review of Afghanistan's role within ECO, SAARC and CAREC, focusing on trade, transport, energy, investment, economic corridors, institutional capacity and geopolitical constraints. The review synthesizes peer-reviewed academic literature and authoritative publications from international and regional institutions and develops a structured literature matrix to identify dominant themes, methodological approaches and research gaps. The findings indicate that the three frameworks provide differentiated but potentially complementary forms of regional cooperation. ECO offers a broad trans-regional institutional platform connecting Central, South and West Asia; SAARC provides Afghanistan with institutional access to South Asian markets but is constrained by political rivalry and weak regional integration; and CAREC provides the strongest project-oriented mechanism for transport infrastructure, trade facilitation, energy connectivity and economic corridors. The review further identifies a persistent implementation gap between regional cooperation commitments and actual economic integration. Security instability, weak institutions, inadequate infrastructure, border and customs constraints, geopolitical competition and limited private-sector participation restrict Afghanistan's ability to convert geographical centrality into sustained economic benefits. Based on the synthesis, the article develops a Trans-Regional Connector Perspective, arguing that Afghanistan's regional economic significance derives not from exclusive membership in one regional institution but from its position at the intersection of multiple cooperation regimes. The review contributes by integrating previously fragmented ECO, SAARC and CAREC scholarship and by conceptualizing institutional overlap as a potential source of economic connectivity rather than merely institutional duplication. The article concludes by identifying future research opportunities concerning post-2021 regional economic diplomacy, corridor-level economic impacts, digital trade facilitation, energy integration, private-sector participation and the relationship between economic interdependence and regional stability.
Ahmed, Z. S., & Zahoor, M. (2018). Afghanistan in SAARC: A critical assessment of organisational expansion. South Asian Survey, 22(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971523117748812
Asian Development Bank. (2011). The new Silk Road: Ten years of the Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Program. Asian Development Bank.
Asian Development Bank. (2014). CAREC transport and trade facilitation strategy 2020. Asian Development Bank.
Asian Development Bank. (2016). Regional cooperation and economic development in Central Asia: 12 things to know. Asian Development Bank.
Asian Development Bank. (2020). Strengthening cross-border community collaboration in the CAREC region: A scoping study. Asian Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.22617/TCS200414-2
Asian Development Bank. (2020). Fostering expanded regional electricity and gas interconnection and trade under the CAREC Energy Strategy 2030. Asian Development Bank.
Asian Development Bank. (2022). Asian economic integration report 2022: Advancing regional cooperation and integration in Asia and the Pacific. Asian Development Bank.
Asian Development Bank. (2023). CAREC program: Independent evaluation of support for regional cooperation and integration. Asian Development Bank.
Asian Development Bank. (2024). Regional action on climate change: A vision for the Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Program. Asian Development Bank.
Asian Development Bank. (2026). CAREC transport strategy 2030: Midterm review. Asian Development Bank.
Balassa, B. (1961). The theory of economic integration. Richard D. Irwin.
Destradi, S. (2015). Difficulties of regional cooperation for Afghanistan: An alternative interpretation. Strategic Analysis, 39(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2014.1001592
D'Souza, S. M. (2009). Afghanistan in South Asia: Regional cooperation or competition? Contemporary South Asia, 16(1), 1–15.
Gleason, G., Hanks, R. R., & Bosin, Y. (2009). Afghanistan reconstruction in regional perspective. Central Asian Survey, 28(3), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634930903421772
Kandiyoti, R. (1998). The Economic Cooperation Organization: Current status and future prospects. Central Asian Survey, 17(1), 35–56.
Linn, J. F. (2008). Regional cooperation in Central Asia: Another step forward with CAREC. Brookings Institution.
Popal, A. S. (2026). Afghanistan regional integration and economic corridors. GAP iNTERDISCIPLINARITIES – A Global Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 9(1), 36–41.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2015). Strengthening connectivity of countries in South and Central Asia. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2015). Afghanistan and Central Asia: Strengthening tradp0”e and economic ties. United Nations ESCAP.
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2016). Trade facilitation and paperless trade implementation survey 2015: Sub-regional notes—North and Central Asia. United Nations ESCAP.
Usman, M. U. R., & Nair, S. (2026). Afghanistan as a Trans-Regional Economic Connector: A Systematic Literature Review of ECO, SAARC and CAREC Cooperation in Central and South Asia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 16(10), 932–955.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode