ISSN: 2226-3624
Open access
This paper conceptualises the idea of an integrity ecosystem as a multi-stakeholder governance framework designed to strengthen inclusive policy outcomes. Traditional single-agency approaches to combating corruption and promoting integrity have proven insufficient in addressing systemic challenges. Drawing from governance theory, systems thinking, and global case studies such as the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative and Open Government Partnership, the paper argues that integrity emerges as a property of collaborative networks involving government, private sector, civil society, and the media. Using an integrative literature review, the study synthesises enabling conditions, including legal frameworks, open data infrastructures, and participatory platforms that make collaboration credible and repeatable. It then develops a conceptual model detailing how co-design, joint monitoring, and conflict-resolution processes can foster trust, accountability, and equity. The findings suggest that embedding integrity within ecosystems ensures policies are more legitimate, inclusive, and sustainable, offering valuable implications for both policymakers and practitioners.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Mackey, B., Morgan, E., & Keith, H. (2024). Evaluating forest landscape management for ecosystem integrity. Landscape Research, 49(2), 246-267.
Masefield, S. C. (2021). Stakeholder engagement in the health policy process in Malawi: Ensuring meaningful participation. Global Health Governance.
Ratner, B. D. (2022). Multistakeholder platforms for natural resource governance. Ecology and Society, 27(2).
Uribe, J. (2024). Excluding through inclusion: managerial practices in the era of multistakeholder governance. Review of inteRnational Political economy, 31(6), 1686-1709.
Reuters. (2024, December 18). Comment: To make fashion sustainable, we need to bring manufacturers in from the cold. Reuters.
Butt, S. (2016). The rise of “governance activism”: The middle class and anti?corruption in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(3), 395–419.
EITI International Secretariat. (2022). What is EITI. Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative.
OECD. (2017). Open Government in Indonesia: The story so far. OECD Publishing.
Transparency International. (2021). Government transparency and accountability during the pandemic: Lessons from the Philippines. Transparency International.
UNDP. (2019). Right to Information and citizen participation in Bangladesh. United Nations Development Programme.
World Bank. (2021). Community-based natural resource governance in Mongolia. World Bank Reports.
Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. (2022). What is EITI.
Mauro, P. (2019). The true cost of global corruption. Finance & Development, 56(3). International Monetary Fund
Neville, S. (2024, April 16). UK could save at least £500mn through better procurement oversight, watchdog says. Financial Times
OECD. (2017). OECD recommendation on public integrity. OECD Legal Instruments.
OECD. (2024a). Implementing the OECD recommendation on public procurement in OECD and partner countries. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2024b). OECD survey on drivers of trust in public institutions: 2024 results.
Open Contracting Partnership, & Spend Network. (2020). Global public procurement: The size of the prize
Simonite, T. (2018, February 12). From the fires of revolution, Ukraine is reinventing government. Wired.
Transparency International. (2021). Government transparency and accountability during the pandemic: Lessons from the Philippines.
Transparency International. (2024). Corruption perceptions index 2024.
Transparency International. (2025, February 11). 2024 corruption perceptions index: Corruption’s devastating role in the climate crisis.
United Nations. (2018, May 9). Cost of corruption at least 5 per cent of global gross domestic product. UN Press.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2004). United Nations Convention against Corruption.
World Bank. (2024). Worldwide governance indicators.
World Economic Forum. (2019, December 23). How bad is the global corruption problem?
Temitope, T. (2023). Investigating innovative models of governance and collaboration for effective public administration in a multi-stakeholder landscape. International Journal Papier Public Review, 4(2), 18-28.
Jansen, L. J., & Kalas, P. P. (2020). Improving governance of tenure in policy and practice: A conceptual basis to analyze multi-stakeholder partnerships for multi-stakeholder transformative governance illustrated with an example from South Africa. Sustainability, 12(23), 9901.
Singh, N. (2024). Promoting Multi-stakeholder Collaboration for Nature-Based Sustainable Development. In Nature-Based Solutions in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: Harmonizing Nature and Progress (pp. 289-316). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Glass, L. M., Newig, J., & Ruf, S. (2023). MSPs for the SDGs–Assessing the collaborative governance architecture of multi-stakeholder partnerships for implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Earth System Governance, 17, 100182.
Brockmyer, B., & Fox, J. A. (2015). Assessing the evidence: The effectiveness and impact of governance-oriented multi-stakeholder initiatives. Transparency & Accountability Initiative, September.
van der Waldt, G. (2025). Towards a Collaborative-adaptive Network Governance Frame-work for Sustainable Development. Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives (JPADA), 10(1), 1-23.
Moreno Serna, J. (2022). Systemic Collaborative Platforms: Accelerating Sustainable Development Goals Transitions Through Multi-stakeholder Convening Arrangements (Doctoral dissertation, Industriales).
Eweje, G., Sajjad, A., Nath, S. D., & Kobayashi, K. (2021). Multi-stakeholder partnerships: A catalyst to achieve sustainable development goals. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(2), 186-212.
Akpe, O. E., Ogeawuchi, J. C., Abayomi, A. A., & Agboola, O. A. (2021). Advances in Stakeholder-Centric Product Lifecycle Management for Complex, Multi-Stakeholder Energy Program Ecosystems. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 4(8), 179-188.
Sahel, J. J. (2016). Multi-stakeholder governance: a necessity and a challenge for global governance in the twenty-first century. Journal of Cyber Policy, 1(2), 157-175.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G. A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). 25 years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 32–44.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 1–13
Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. (2022). What is EITI.
OECD. (2017). Recommendation of the Council on Public Integrity. OECD Legal Instruments.
OECD. (2018). The open government data report: Enhancing policy through open data. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2024). OECD survey on drivers of trust in public institutions: 2024 results. OECD Publishing.
Open Contracting Partnership, & Spend Network. (2020). Global public procurement: The size of the prize.
Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2004). United Nations Convention against Corruption.
Razali, F. M., Mustaffa, A. H., & Darusalam, D. (2025). Building Integrity Ecosystems: Conceptualising Multi-Stakeholder Governance for Inclusive Policy Outcomes. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 14(3), 787–804.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode