Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-3624

Knowledge Sharing Paradox in Green HRM: Dual Effects on Compensation and Employee Involvement for SDGs

Alshahrani Ahmed Musa, Rosmah Mohamed, Anusuiya Subramaniam

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJAREMS/v15-i1/27753

Open access

Knowledge management literature overwhelmingly portrays knowledge sharing as universally beneficial for organizational outcomes. This study challenges this assumption by uncovering a paradox: extensive green knowledge sharing (GKS) can simultaneously amplify certain human resource management practices while undermining others. Drawing on data from 414 faculty members across four Saudi public universities and employing moderation analysis within a Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling framework, we examine how GKS differentially moderates the relationships between two contrasting green HRM practices (employee involvement and compensation) and sustainable development goals (SDGs) achievement. Results reveal striking asymmetry: GKS positively moderates the compensation-SDGs relationship (? = 0.087, p = 0.015), creating synergy between formal rewards and informal learning. However, GKS negatively moderates the involvement-SDGs relationship (? = -0.120, p = 0.023), revealing that extensive knowledge exchange can undermine participatory governance. We theorize five mechanisms explaining this paradox: information overload, substitution effects, diffusion of responsibility, coordination costs, and focus displacement. Grounded in Social Exchange Theory and the Ability-Motivation-Opportunity framework, this research demonstrates that knowledge sharing effectiveness depends fundamentally on the nature of the focal HRM practice. For transactional, criterion-based practices like compensation, knowledge sharing enhances effectiveness by clarifying reward pathways. For relational, participatory practices like employee involvement, excessive knowledge exchange creates cognitive burden and crowds out formal participation. This study contributes to knowledge management theory by identifying boundary conditions of knowledge sharing benefits, advances contingency perspectives in green HRM research, and offers practical guidance for calibrating knowledge systems to complement rather than compete with participatory structures. Our findings carry profound implications for universities and organizations pursuing sustainability: more knowledge sharing is not always better, and strategic restraint may prove more effective than maximalist information exchange.

Ali Khalfan Al-Naqbi, Qasim Alshannag, (2018) "The status of education for sustainable development and sustainability knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of UAE University students", International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2017-0091
Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150-169.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons.
Chennamaneni, A., & Teng, J. T. (2012). An integrated framework for effective tacit knowledge transfer. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems.
Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), 64-88.
Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of literature. The Information Society, 20(5), 325-344.
Fong, P. S., Men, C., Luo, J., & Jia, R. (2018). Knowledge hiding and team creativity: The contingent role of task interdependence. Management Decision, 56(2), 329-343.
Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2015). Pay, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, performance, and creativity in the workplace. Compensation & Benefits Review, 47(3), 143-168.
Gericke, N., Boeve?de Pauw, J., Berglund, T., & Olsson, D. (2019). The Sustainability Consciousness Questionnaire: The theoretical development and empirical validation of an evaluation instrument for stakeholders working with sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 27
Haas, M. R., & Hansen, M. T. (2007). Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal, 28(11), 1133-1153.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage Publications.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.
Jackson, S. E., Renwick, D. W., Jabbour, C. J., & Muller-Camen, M. (2014). State-of-the-art and future directions for green human resource management. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(2), 99-116.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help? Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., Paço, A., Mifsud, M., Ávila, L. V., Brandli, L. L., ... & Caeiro, S. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals and sustainability teaching at universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 285-294.
Lin, H. F., & Chen, C. H. (2017). Combining the technology acceptance model and uses and gratifications theory. Symmetry, 9(7), 113.
Mäkelä, K., & Brewster, C. (2009). Interunit interaction contexts, interpersonal social capital, and knowledge sharing. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 591-613.
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535-546.
Ministry of Education. (2023). Higher education statistics. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Nejati, M., Rabiei, S., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2017). Envisioning the invisible: Understanding the synergy between green HRM and green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1382-1391.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Renwick, D. W., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1-14.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS.
Rubel, M. R. B., Kee, D. M. H., & Rimi, N. N. (2021). The influence of green HRM practices on green service behaviors: The mediating effect of green knowledge sharing. Employee Relations, 43(5), 996-1015.
Tang, G., Chen, Y., Jiang, Y., Paillé, P., & Jia, J. (2018). Green human resource management practices: Scale development and validity. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56(1), 31-55.
Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115-131.
Zibarras, L. D., & Coan, P. (2015). HRM practices used to promote pro-environmental behavior: A UK survey. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(16), 2121-2142.

Musa, A. A., Mohamed, R., & Subramaniam, A. (2026). Knowledge Sharing Paradox in Green HRM: Dual Effects on Compensation and Employee Involvement for SDGs. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 15(1), 1007–1025.