Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-3624

Developing An Integrated Model of Green Building Initiatives (GBI) in Malaysia: Issues and Challenges from Different Stakeholders Perspectives

Zaherawati Zakaria, Nazni Noordin, Mohd Zool Hilmie Mohamed Sawal, Nurul Amira Azmi

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJAREMS/v15-i2/27835

Open access

Malaysia has advanced several policy and institutional initiatives to mainstream green buildings and low-carbon technologies. Despite a mature voluntary rating system Green Building Index (GBI) and national policy frameworks (National Green Technology Policy 2009; Green Technology Master Plan 2017–2030), the uptake of green building technologies remains uneven across developers, contractors, financiers, occupants, and government agencies. This systematic literature review synthesizes empirical and policy literature (2000–2024) to (i) identify barriers and enablers reported by different stakeholder groups; (ii) analyse how national policy has influenced adoption; and (iii) propose an integrated model to operationalize GBI uptake across Malaysia. Key barriers include cost and financing bottlenecks, limited technical capacity and supply-chain constraints, weak enforcement and incentives, fragmented institutional responsibility, and low public awareness. The proposed integrated model combines (a) governance & policy instruments, (b) financing & incentives, (c) standards & certification alignment (GBI), (d) capacity building & supply chain development, (e) stakeholder engagement & public awareness, and (f) monitoring, data & continuous improvement. The review concludes with actionable policy recommendations and research directions to scale green building initiatives in Malaysia.

ADB’s Law & Policy Reform Program. (n.d.). National Green Technology Policy, 2009 (Malaysia). Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from https://lpr.adb.org/resource/national-green-technology-policy-2009-malaysia
Choi, Y., & Lee, K. (2020). Green building policies and practices in South Korea: A review. Sustainability, 12(4), 1593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041593
Climate-Laws.org. (2009). National Green Technology Policy (Malaysia). Retrieved from https://climate-laws.org/document/national-green-technology-policy_9e82
Darko, A., & Chan, A. P. C. (2016). Critical analysis of green building research trend in construction journals. Habitat International, 57, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.07.001
DFDL. (2020). Green financing in Malaysia: Opportunities and challenges. DFDL Legal & Tax Advisors.Green Building Index. (2023). About GBI. Malaysia Green Building Confederation. Retrieved from https://greenbuildingindex.org
Green Building Index. (2024). About GBI: Certification and standards. Retrieved from https://greenbuildingindex.org
Green Building Index. (n.d.). Green Building Index (GBI). Malaysia Green Building Confederation / Malaysia Green Building Council. Retrieved from https://www.greenbuildingindex.org/
GreenQuarter. (2018, April 11). Green Technology Master Plan 2017–2030. Retrieved from https://www.greenquarter.biz/ideas-stories/green-technology-master-plan-2017-2030/
Haron, N. A., Zainon, N., & Anuar, M. K. (2022). Barriers to green building implementation in Malaysia’s construction industry: A review. Journal of Building Performance, 13(1), 12–25.
HRMARS. (n.d.). Barriers of green-building technology adoption in Malaysia: contractors’ perspective. Human Resources Management Academic Research Society (HRMARS). Retrieved from https://hrmars.com/papers_submitted/14490/barriers-of-green-building-technology-adoption-in-malaysia-contractors-perspective.pdf
IEA. (2020). Energy efficiency 2020. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-efficiency-2020
International Energy Agency (IEA). (2020). Energy efficiency 2020. https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-efficiency-2020
Jaffar, N., Affendi, N. I. N., Mohammad Ali, I., Ishak, N., & Jaafar, A. S. (2022). Barriers of green building technology adoption in malaysia: Contractors’ perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i8/14490
Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery. John Wiley & Sons.
Lee, W., & Yik, F. W. H. (2018). Green building practices in Singapore: Review and policy implications. Building and Environment, 140, 58-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.014
Lim, C. K., Tan, K. L., & Hambira, N. (2018). An investigation on the level of public awareness of green homes in Malaysia through web-based illustrations. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2016(1), 020074. AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5055476
Malaysian Investment Development Authority (MIDA). (2021). Malaysia’s green technology incentives and investment opportunities. https://www.mida.gov.my
MIDA. (2024). Malaysia’s green financing landscape: Opportunities and challenges. Malaysian Investment Development Authority.
Ministry of Energy, Green Technology & Water (Malaysia). (2009). National Green Technology Policy (NGTP, 2009). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
National Green Technology Policy (NGTP). (2009). Ministry of Energy, Green Technology and Water, Malaysia.
Nguyen, H.-T., Skitmore, M., Gray, M., Zhang, X., & Olanipekun, A. O. (2017). Will green building development take off? An exploratory study of barriers to green building in Vietnam. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.012
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
Othman, N., & Yusuf, M. (2016). Building energy for sustainable development in Malaysia: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 64, 774–783.
Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Prime Minister’s Office of Malaysia. (2017). Green Technology Master Plan 2017–2030. Retrieved from https://www.pmo.gov.my
Putrajaya. (n.d.). National Green Technology Policy. Perbadanan Putrajaya. Retrieved March 9, 2026, from https://ppj.gov.my
Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., & Shukla, K. K. (2012). Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. Energy and Buildings, 42(10), 1592–1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.007
Saidur, R., Masjuki, H. H., & Jamaluddin, M. Y. (2012). Energy utilization and environmental aspects of Malaysian buildings. Journal of Energy and Buildings, 55, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.01.028
Samari, M., Ghodrati, N., Esmaeilifar, R., Olfat, P., & Mohd Shafiei, M. W. (2013). The investigation of the barriers in developing green building in malaysia. Modern Applied Science, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v7n2p1
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence?informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
U.S. Green Building Council. (2019). LEED in motion: Green building trends. USGBC. https://www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-motion-green-building-trends
Zahari, N. F., Mohd Yusoff, S., & Al Bakri, A. M. (2019). Barriers to the adoption of green building technologies in Malaysia. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 24(2), 101-117.
Zainul Abidin, N. (2010). Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction concept by Malaysian developers. Habitat International, 34(4), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.11.011

Zakaria, Z., Noordin, N., Sawal, M. Z. H. M., & Azmi, N. A. (2026). Developing An Integrated Model of Green Building Initiatives (GBI) in Malaysia: Issues and Challenges from Different Stakeholders Perspectives. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 15(2), 49–61.