Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-3624

How Green Supplier Integration Drives Green Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms under the Knowledge-Based View

Bo Lixing, Khaw Khai Wah, Xu Jie

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJAREMS/v15-i1/27894

Open access

Drawing on survey data from 208 Chinese manufacturing firms, this study demonstrates that green supplier integration (GSI) significantly enhances firms’ knowledge absorptive capacity (KAC), which in turn promotes both green product and process innovation. KAC partially mediates the relationship between GSI and green innovation (GI), indicating that supplier collaboration fosters the acquisition, assimilation, and transformation of external environmental knowledge into innovative outcomes. These findings, grounded in the knowledge-based view, reveal the synergistic effects of GSI and KAC in driving sustainable innovation performance and provide new insights into how supply chain collaboration and knowledge integration strengthen firms’ green competitiveness. Purpose: This study investigates the impact of green supplier integration on green innovation in Chinese manufacturing firms, focusing on the mediating role of knowledge absorption capability. It aims to elucidate the mechanisms through which supplier collaboration promotes both green product and green process innovation. Design/methodology/approach: Drawing on the knowledge-based view (KBV), this study examines the direct effects of green supplier integration (GSI) on green innovation (encompassing green product innovation and green process innovation) as well as the indirect effects of GSI on green innovation through knowledge absorptive capacity (KAC) as a mediator. Adopting a quantitative research approach, we collected survey data from middle-to-senior managers of Chinese manufacturing enterprises with green supply chain practices between March and June 2024, ultimately obtaining 208 valid questionnaires. Structural equation modeling via SmartPLS 4.0 was employed to analyze the collected data and test the proposed relationships in the theoretical framework. Findings: GSI significantly enhances firms’ absorptive capacity, which partially mediates its positive effects on green product and process innovation. The results highlight that effective knowledge acquisition and transformation from suppliers are key drivers of sustainable innovation and competitive advantage. Research limitations/implications: This study is limited by its focus on supplier integration, potential contextual moderators (e.g., top management support, inter-organizational trust), and reliance on single-informant survey data. Future research could adopt multi-source or longitudinal designs and consider customer integration to provide a more comprehensive understanding of factors shaping KAC and GI. Practical implications: Managers should strengthen green supplier integration through green procurement, systematic supplier management, and active supplier collaboration, while developing internal mechanisms to absorb and apply external knowledge effectively. These practices can enhance green innovation performance and support sustainable supply chain development. Originality/value: Drawing on the knowledge-based view, this study offers three key original contributions. Methodologically, it uses advanced PLS-SEM standards (HTMT, bootstrapping, PLSpredict) to analyze 208 Chinese manufacturers’ data, addressing prior technical gaps. Theoretically, it unpacks the GSI-GI “black box” by identifying knowledge absorptive capacity as a mediator, extending KBV to sustainable supply chains. Contextually, it distinguishes green product/process innovation to explore GSI’s heterogeneous effects, reflecting Chinese manufacturers’ practical green transformation needs, enriching academia and guiding corporate sustainability under “dual carbon” goals.

Abbas, A., Luo, X., Shahzad, F., & Wattoo, M. U. (2023). Optimizing organizational performance in manufacturing: The role of IT capability, green supply chain integration, and green innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 423, 138848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138848
Alharbi, K., Alamri, A. A., & Gassas, R. (2024). Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Arabic Version of the Student Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (S-EBPQ)”. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1281. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06259-4
Alkhatib, A. W. (2024). Fostering green innovation: the roles of big data analytics capabilities and green supply chain integration. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(8), 2818-2840. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-09-2022-0491
Arfi, W. B., Hikkerova, L., & Sahut, J. M. (2018). External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance. Technological forecasting and social change, 129, 210-220.
Asiedu, M. A., Anyigba, H., & Doe, J. K. (2023). Absorptive capacity and innovation generation in higher education institutions: the mediating role of inter-functional coordination. The Learning Organization, 30(4), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-11-2022-0128
Baquero, A. (2024). Unveiling the path to green innovation: the interplay of green learning orientation, knowledge management capability and manufacturing firm’s capability to orchestrate resources. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 39(10), 2205-2221. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-08-2023-0486
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Cai, W. G., & Zhou, X. L. (2014). On the drivers of eco-innovation: empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.035
Chen, L., Wang, N., Li, Q., & Zhou, W. (2023). Environmental regulation, foreign direct investment and China’s economic development under the new normal: Restrain or promote?. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(5), 4195-4216.https://www.proquest.com/openview/984412ef8a8dc317070dcdd5f29fdf3d/1?cbl=25739&pq-origsite=gscholar
Chen, P. C., & Hung, S. W. (2014). Collaborative green innovation in emerging countries: a social capital perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(3), 347-363. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-06-2012-0222
Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5
Chen, Y.-S. (2008). The Driver of Green Innovation and Green Image – Green Core Competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9522-1
Chen, Y.-S., Chang, T.-W., Lin, C.-Y., Lai, P.-Y., & Wang, K.-H. (2016). The Influence of Proactive Green Innovation and Reactive Green Innovation on Green Product Development Performance: The Mediation Role of Green Creativity. Sustainability, 8(10), 966. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8100966
Cheng, C., Sayed Fayaz Ahmad, Irshad, M., Ghadeer Alsanie, Khan, Y., Ahmad, & Abdur Rahman Aleemi. (2023). Impact of Green Process Innovation and Productivity on Sustainability: The Moderating Role of Environmental Awareness. Sustainability, 15(17), 12945–12945. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712945
Cheng, J., & Xu, N. R. (2024). The impacts of artificial intelligence literacy, green absorptive capacity, and green information system on green innovation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(2), 2375–2389. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3017
China Digital Supply Chain Research Center. (2025). AI-Enabled Green Supply Chain: Technology Architecture and Implementation Paths. CSDN Press.
Choudhuri, S. S. (2024). AI - Driven Supply Chain Optimization: Enhancing Inventory Management, Demand Forecasting, and Logistics within ERP Systems. International Journal of Science and Research, 13(3), 927–933. https://doi.org/10.21275/sr24314073027
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Cui, R., Wang, J., Xue, Y., & Liang, H. (2021). Interorganizational learning, green knowledge integration capability and green innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(4), 1292-1314. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-11-2019-0325
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Luo, Z., & Roubaud, D. (2017). Can big data and predictive analytics improve social and environmental sustainability? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.020
Eteokleous, P. P., Leonidou, L. C., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in international marketing: review, assessment, and future research. International Marketing Review, 33(4), 580-624. https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-04-2014-0120
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
Guo, Y., Bai, C., & Sun, M. (2024). Effects of green supplier integration and development in competing supply chains. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 71(5), 676-692. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22174
Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
Hayat, K., & Qingyu, Z. (2024). The synergistic effects of green innovation strategies on sustainable innovative performance with the mediation of green innovative competitive advantage. Corporate Social-Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2770
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composite models. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431.
Hong, J., Zheng, R., Deng, H., & Zhou, Y. (2019). Green supply chain collaborative innovation, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118377
Hussein, H., Albadry, O. M., Mathew, V., Al-Romeedy, B. S., Alsetoohy, O., Abou Kamar, M., & Khairy, H. A. (2024). Digital leadership and sustainable competitive advantage: leveraging green absorptive capability and eco-innovation in tourism and hospitality businesses. Sustainability, 16(13), 5371.
Ibrahim, M., Mahmood, R., & Som, H. M. (2025). Green absorptive capacity and environmental performance: a perspective of SMEs’ relational capability and green supply chain management practices. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(6), 13947-13971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04420-5
Javeed, S. A., Teh, B. H., Ong, T. S., Lan, N. T. P., Muthaiyah, S., & Latief, R. (2023). The Connection between Absorptive Capacity and Green Innovation: The Function of Board Capital and Environmental Regulation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3119. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043119
Javed, A., Li, Q., & Basit, A. (2025). Enhancing ambidextrous green innovation: the role of green supply chain integration, knowledge capabilities and technology dynamism in manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 36(2), 431-454. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-08-2024-0437
Junaid, M., Zhang, Q., & Syed, M. W. (2022). Effects of sustainable supply chain integration on green innovation and firm performance. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.031
Khan, S. J., Dhir, A., Parida, V., & Papa, A. (2021). Past, present, and future of green product innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 4081–4106. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2858
Kong, T., Feng, T., Huang, Y., & Cai, J. (2020). How to convert green supply chain integration efforts into green innovation: A perspective of knowledge?based view. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1106-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2062
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Liu, B., & De Giovanni, P. (2019). Green process innovation through Industry 4.0 technologies and supply chain coordination. Annals of Operations Research, 349(2), 767-802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03498-3
Liu, L., Wang, X., & Wang, Z. (2023). Recent progress and emerging strategies for carbon peak and carbon neutrality in China. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 13(5), 732-759. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2235
Liu, Z., Xiang, W., Wang, J., Chen, W., & Zhou, Y. (2025). Spatiotemporal patterns and regional disparities in the coupling and coordination between green finance and ecological environment in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1508830
Ma, Y., Liu, P., & Chen, H. (2024). Corporate ESG performance, green innovation, and green new quality productivity: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 16(22), 9804. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229804
MARDIA, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
Melander, L. (2018). Customer and Supplier Collaboration in Green Product Innovation: External and Internal Capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(6), 677–693. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2024
Melander, L., & Pazirandeh, A. (2019). Collaboration beyond the supply network for green innovation: insight from 11 cases. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24(4), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-08-2018-0285
Montabon, F., Daugherty, P. J., & Chen, H. (2017). Setting Standards for Single Respondent Survey Design. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 54(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12158
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Presser, S., Couper, M. P., Lessler, J. T., Martin, E., Martin, J., Rothgeb, J. M., & Singer, E. (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh008
Qiu, L., Jie, X., Wang, Y., & Zhao, M. (2020). Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 146-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1780
Qu, K., & Liu, Z. (2022). Green innovations, supply chain integration and green information system: A model of moderation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 339, 130557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130557
Riaz, M., Jie, W., Sherani, Ali, S., & Chang, S. (2024). Assessing the role of organizational strategic factors in stimulating green innovation performance: moderating effects of green absorptive capacity. Business Process Management Journal, 30(4), 1013-1043. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-12-2023-0967
Sahoo, S., Kumar, A., & Upadhyay, A. (2023). How do green knowledge management and green technology innovation impact corporate environmental performance? Understanding the role of green knowledge acquisition. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 551-569. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3160
Saxena, V. (2025). Water Quality, Air Pollution, and Climate Change: Investigating the Environmental Impacts of Industrialization and Urbanization. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 236(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-024-07702-4
Shahzad, M. A., Jianguo, D., & Junaid, M. (2023). Impact of green HRM practices on sustainable performance: mediating role of green innovation, green culture, and green employees’ behavior. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(38), 88524-88547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28498-6
Shehzad, M. U., Zhang, J., Dost, M., Ahmad, M. S., & Alam, S. (2024). Knowledge management enablers and knowledge management processes: a direct and configurational approach to stimulate green innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(1), 123-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-02-2022-0076
Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2011). The Effects of Business and Political Ties on Firm Performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.75.1.1
Sun, Y., & Sun, H. (2021). Green innovation strategy and ambidextrous green innovation: The mediating effects of green supply chain integration. Sustainability, 13(9), 4876. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094876
Rosell, D., Lakemond, N., & Nazli Wasti, S. (2014). Integrating knowledge with suppliers at the R&D-manufacturing interface. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 25(2), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-12-2013-0171
Wagner, S. M., & Hoegl, M. (2006). Involving suppliers in product development: Insights from R&D directors and project managers. Industrial marketing management, 35(8), 936-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.10.009
Walde, P., & Völlm, B. A. (2023). The TRAPD approach as a method for questionnaire translation. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1199989.
Wang, C., & Hu, Q. (2020). Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Technovation, 94, 102010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.002
Wang, C., Zhang, X. E., & Teng, X. (2023). How to convert green entrepreneurial orientation into green innovation: the role of knowledge creation process and green absorptive capacity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1260-1273. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3187
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
Zhang, J., Liang, G., Feng, T., Yuan, C., & Jiang, W. (2019). Green innovation to respond to environmental regulation: How external knowledge adoption and green absorptive capacity matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2349
Zhang, J., & Liu, Z. (2023). Study on the Impact of Corporate ESG Performance on Green Innovation Performance—Evidence from Listed Companies in China A-Shares. Sustainability, 15(20), 14750–14750. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014750
Zhang, L., Peng, J., Liu, J., & Huang, W. (2023). The impact of carbon-biased technological progress on carbon haze coordinated governance: insights from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(25), 36329–36348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28614-6
Zhao, C., Ju, S., Xue, Y., Ren, T., Ji, Y., & Chen, X. (2022). China’s energy transitions for carbon neutrality: challenges and opportunities. Carbon Neutrality, 1(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43979-022-00010-y
Zhang, X., Le, Y., Meng, Q., & Teng, X. (2023). Green entrepreneurial orientation and financial performance in Chinese firms: The role of stakeholder engagement and green absorptive capacity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(3), 1082–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2405

Lixing, B., Wah, K. K., & Jie, X. (2026). How Green Supplier Integration Drives Green Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms under the Knowledge-Based View. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 15(1), 547–565.