ISSN: 2226-3624
Open access
Purpose: This research explores how ecoanimation can support environmental communication and cultural storytelling along the Maritime Silk Road (MSR). It examines the role of AI in shaping sustainable creative practices, identifies the key dimensions involved in MSR-focused ecoanimation, and explains how these elements work together to strengthen cultural continuity and responsible production. Design/methodology/approach: The research adopts a conceptual approach, drawing on recent work in animation studies, sustainability, digital heritage, and AI-assisted design. Insights from the literature and two MSR-related cases (2020–2025) are synthesised into the AISAC framework, which outlines five interconnected dimensions: AI mediation, ecoanimation practice, sustainable value chain, audience co-agency, and cultural continuity. Findings: The research highlights how the five AISAC dimensions shape ecoanimation projects and shows their relevance for authenticity, environmental responsibility, and participatory cultural interpretation. It also demonstrates how AI tools can support sustainable production processes and deepen audience engagement in heritage communication. Research limitations/implications: As a concept-driven study centred on MSR contexts, it does not include empirical testing. Further work using production data, creator interviews, and comparative regional cases could help validate and extend the AISAC model. Practical implications: The research provides useful guidance for animators, cultural organisations, and policymakers aiming to embed sustainability in digital creative work. The AISAC framework offers a reference for developing responsible workflows, protecting cultural integrity, and encouraging low-impact production. It may also serve as a teaching resource for training emerging creators in sustainable and culturally aware design. Originality/value: This research brings together ecoanimation, AI-enabled creative practice, and MSR cultural communication within a single framework. It offers a structured foundation for future empirical studies and supports ongoing discussions on sustainable innovation in the creative industries.
Chao, J. (2025). Research on the application of generative AI in digital art design for intangible cultural heritage. Journal of Global Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(3), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.61360/BoniGHSS252017990301
Feng, J., & Yang, W. (2024). A sustainable development path for the animation industry empowered by the metaverse and generative AI. Sustainability, 16(13), 5678. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135678
He, Z., Su, J., Chen, L., Wang, T., & Ray, L. C. (2024). “I recall the past”: Exploring how people collaborate with generative AI to create cultural heritage narratives. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00359
Idrees, A. (2025). Reviving cultural heritage in a virtual reality environment: The role of artificial intelligence and 3D modeling. International Journal of Digital. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.21608/idj.2025.391768.1349
Laba, N. (2025). Whose imagination? Conflicting narratives and sociotechnical futures of visual generative AI. AI & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02675-2
Li, C., Ye, Z., Wen, W., Li, L., & Shao, J. (2025). Beyond photorealism: An AIGC-powered framework for stylized and gamified cultural heritage revitalization. Buildings, 15(20), 3782. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203782
Manovich, L. (2020). AI and the future of visual media: A framework for analysis. AI & Society, 35(4), 1027–1043.
McCosker, A., & Wilken, R. (2020). Automating vision and creativity. Media International Australia, 177(1), 35–49.
Rodríguez-Miranda, Á., Blanco, M., & Pérez, S. (2021). Participatory digital heritage and community engagement. Heritage & Society, 14(2), 89–104.
Sen, T. (2023). Inventing the ‘Maritime Silk Road’. Modern Asian Studies, 57(4), 1153–1177. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X22000612
Soini, K., & Birkeland, I. (2014). Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability. Geoforum, 51, 213–223.
Spennemann, D. H. R. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence, human agency and the future of cultural heritage. Heritage, 7(7), 3597–3609. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7070170
Thompson, J., Lau, F., & Peters, B. (2022). AI-driven visual analysis for historical archives. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 37(3), 643–661.
Tsukamoto, R. (2024). Generative AI for cultural preservation: Synthesizing language, art, and oral histories. Australian Journal of Modern Research & Applications, 6(3), 70–78.
Uppsala University ALM Centre. (2024). AI, cultural heritage, and bias: Some key queries that arise from the use of GenAI. Heritage, 7(11), 6125–6136. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7110287
Zhao, J., Dalal, S., Abu Bakar, A. A., & Wan Yahaya, W. A. J. (2024). The artistic creation of cultural sustainability through 3D animation and AIGC. Journal of Creative Arts, 15(1), 45–60.
Yuan, F., Bakhir, N. B. M., Lihua, H., Zhi, T., & Peng, Y. (2026). AI-Enabled Eco–Animation and Sustainable Cultural Communication: Reframing Maritime Silk Road Heritage for the Creative Economy. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 15(1), 592–599.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode