ISSN: 2226-3624
Open access
Purpose: This paper aims to explore how blockchain technology influences supply chain performance in the Chinese automotive industry. Drawing on trust theory and information asymmetry theory, it investigates the mechanisms through which blockchain enhances performance via technological trust, supply chain trust, and institutional trust, and examines the moderating role of supply chain transparency. Design/methodology/approach: A conceptual model is developed based on existing theories. The study employs a quantitative research design and plans to use Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to empirically test the proposed hypotheses using data from the Chinese automotive sector. Findings: Preliminary theoretical analysis suggests that blockchain technology adoption can improve supply chain performance by reducing information asymmetry and enhancing multiple dimensions of trust among supply chain partners. Transparency is expected to strengthen these trust-building effects. (As the study is ongoing) Research limitations/implications: Since the research is still in progress, empirical results are not yet available. Future studies can complement this work with longitudinal data and cross-industry comparisons to validate the model’s broader applicability. Practical implications: The study provides guidance for firms and policymakers seeking to build blockchain-enabled trust mechanisms within complex industrial supply chains. It highlights how improving technological, relational, and institutional trust can enhance operational efficiency and coordination. Originality/value: This paper integrates trust theory and information asymmetry theory to conceptualize blockchain’s governance role in supply chains. It offers a multi-dimensional trust framework and identifies transparency as a key moderating factor, contributing new theoretical insight and practical relevance to blockchain-based supply chain research.
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality, uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.
Babbie, E. R. (2020). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Bachmann, R., & Inkpen, A. C. (2011). Understanding institutional-based trust building processes in inter-organizational relationships. Organization Studies, 32(2), 281–301.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. *Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1*(3), 185-216.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM). (2023). Annual report on automotive supply chain digitalization. CAAM Press.
Cao, Z., & Lumineau, F. (2015). Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 33–34, 15–42.
Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Del Vecchio, P., Oropallo, E., & Secundo, G. (2022). Blockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability and transparency in circular supply chain. Information & Management, 59(7), 103508.
da Silva, E. R., Lohmer, J., Rohla, M., & Angelis, J. (2023). Unleashing the circular economy in the electric vehicle battery supply chain: A case study on data sharing and blockchain technology potential. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 193, 106969.
Delbufalo, E. (2012). Outcomes of inter-organizational trust in supply chain relationships: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of empirical evidence. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(4), 377–402.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
Francisco, K., & Swanson, D. (2018). The supply chain has no clothes: Technology adoption of blockchain for supply chain transparency. Logistics, 2(1), 2.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review.
Han, W., Huang, Y., & Macbeth, D. (2018). Performance measurement of cross-culture supply chain partnership: A case study in the Chinese automotive industry. International Journal of Production Research, 56(7), 2437–2451.
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2-20.
Jing, Y., Zhang, R., & Liu, L. (2024). Transparency and digital trust in blockchain-based industrial ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 198, 122421.
Khan, M., Parvaiz, G. S., Dedahanov, A. T., Abdurazzakov, O. S., & Rakhmonov, D. A. (2022). The impact of technologies of traceability and transparency in supply chains. Sustainability, 14(24), 16336.
Kim, S. T., Lee, H. H., & Hwang, T. (2020). Logistics integration in the supply chain: a resource dependence theory perspective. International Journal of Quality Innovation, 6(1), 5.
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Kouhizadeh, M., & Sarkis, J. (2018). Blockchain practices, potentials, and perspectives in sustainability: A review. Sustainability, 10(7), 2232.
Kshetri, N. (2018). 1 Blockchain’s roles in strengthening cybersecurity and protecting privacy. Telecommunications Policy, 42(4), 327–339.
Lippert, S. K. (2007). Investigating postadoption utilization: An examination into the role of interorganizational and technology trust. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(3), 468-483.
Liu, H., He, G., Ma, R., & Fu, S. (2023). The Impact of Social Capital on Socially Responsible Supply Chain Performance: The Moderating Role of Supply Chain Transparency. Foods, 12(19), 3624.
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power: Two works by Niklas Luhmann. John Wiley & Sons.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
Mollenkopf, D., Peinkofer, S. T., & Chu, Y. (2022). Supply chain transparency: Consumer reactions to incongruent signals. Journal of Operations Management, 67(3), 34-46.
Mol, A. P. J. (2015). Transparency and value chain sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 154–161.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
Queiroz, M. M., Telles, R., & Bonilla, S. H. (2019). Blockchain and supply chain management integration: A systematic review of the literature. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(2), 241–254.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH.
Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117–2135.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students. Pearson.
Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel (K. H. Wolff, Trans. ). Free Press.(Original work published 1908)
Sitinjak, C., Ismail, R., Tahir, Z., Fajar, R., Simanullang, W. F., Bantu, E., . . . & Harun, Z. (2022). Acceptance of ELV management: The role of social influence, knowledge, attitude, institutional trust, and health issues. Sustainability, 14(16), 10201.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Information and the change in the paradigm in economics. American Economic Review, 92(3), 460–501.
Wang, M., & Yang, Y. (2022). An empirical analysis of the supply chain flexibility using Blockchain technology. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1004007.
Wu, Q., Zhu, J., & Cheng, Y. (2023). The effect of cross-organizational governance on supply chain resilience: A mediating and moderating model. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 29(1), 100817.
Zhang, X., Sun, P., Xu, J., Wang, X., Yu, J., Zhao, Z., & Dong, Y. (2020). Blockchain technology-based safety management system for the grain supply chain. IEEE Access, 8, 36398-36410.
Zhou, H., Wang, Q., Li, L., Teo, T. S., & Yang, S. (2023). Supply chain digitalization and performance improvement: A moderated mediation model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 28(6), 993–1008.
Zhou, K. Z., Zhang, Q., Sheng, S., & Bao, Y. (2014). Are relational ties always good for knowledge acquisition? Buyer–supplier exchanges in China. Journal of Operations Management, 32(3), 88–98.
Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business research methods. Cengage Learning.
Yuan, Z., & Sharon, C. P. Y. (2026). Blockchain Technology Adoption and Supply Chain Performance in China’s Automotive Industry: The Mediating Role of Trust and the Moderating Role of Transparency. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 15(1), 684-694.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode