ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The doctrine of privity provides that only the contracting parties to a contract incur rights and obligations under the contract. Third parties cannot sue or be sued under a contract. Thus, if a manufacturer who sells a product to a seller who then sells it to a consumer who is injured by the product, the consumer could sue the seller based on the contract of sale between the seller and the consumer. The consumer cannot sue the manufacturer because there is no contract between the consumer and the manufacturer. This article thus addresses the question of the extent to which the doctrine of privity can give rise to liability on the part of the manufacture or the seller on the issue of halal. The findings of this study suggest that the doctrine of privity has some weaknesses that need to be addressed in order to provide better consumer protection on the issue of halal.
Beatson, J., Burrows, A., & Cartwright, J. (2020). Anson's law of contract. Oxford University Press.
Cartwright, J. (1996). Damages, Third Parties and Common Sense’. Journal of Contract Law, 10, 244-272.
Isa, S. M., Aziz, A. A., & Yusoff, S. S. A. (2011). Undang-undang Kontrak Malaysia: Keterbatasan Pemakaian dalam Kontrak Pengguna. Jurnal Pengurusan, 32, 39-53.
Lee, K. H., Gan, S. Y., Mohd-Danuri, M. S., & Zolkafli, U. K. (2020). Critical analysis of “doctrine of privity” in Malaysian construction industry. Malaysian Construction Research Journal: RISM International Research Conference 2020, 9(1), 103-113.
Stevens, R. H. (2004). The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. Law Quarterly Review, 120, 292-323.
Yusoff, S. S. A., Ismail, R., Markom, R., & Zakuan, Z. Z. M. (2015). Consumer protection and the Malaysian Sale of Goods Act 1957. International Business Management, 9(4), 452-459.
In-Text Citation: (Naimat et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Naimat, N., Bakar, E. A., & Arif, A. M. M. (2022). Challenges in Claiming Under The Doctrine of Privity Contract in Malaysia: The Issue of Halal. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(8), 1031 – 1036.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode