ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The alarmingly high number of divorces among Malaysians was brought on by a failure to uphold legal obligations and rights throughout marriage. Failure to fulfil marital obligations worsened following divorce, as evidenced by incidents of non-compliance with the Syariah Court orders on post-divorce financial supports. These failures are a reflection of how Muslims view family law, which affects how they behave. Legal socialization has been cited by earlier scholars as one of the developmental processes that would affect the pattern of individuals socialization and help shape legal attitudes and law-abiding behaviour. The Western setting has produced a wealth of literature on legal socialization, in which criminology dominated the majority of studies. Little is known about Malaysians' legal socialization within the context of Islamic family law and how they adhere to the law on family maintenance. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the legal socialization of individuals, their compliance with Islamic family law, and the associations between different facets of legal socialization and compliance among married and divorced Muslims in the State of Selangor. Four instruments on legal socialization (legitimacy of the law, procedural justice, legal cynicism, moral disengagement), and a self-report of compliance behavior were adapted from previous studies by Fagan and Tyler (2005) and Bandura et al. (1996). Findings show that the respondents have a high level of legitimacy of the law and procedural justice and a low level of legal cynicism and moral disengagement. Respondents’ positive experience with procedural justice have been found significantly related to their compliance behaviour. Hence, advocacy efforts to increase legal literacy on family rights and obligations among Muslims must be intensified at all levels, realizing the impact of legal socialization to uphold legal obligations towards the family.
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
Crisogen, D. T. (2015). Types of socialization and their importance in understanding the phenomena of socialization, European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 2(4), 288–293. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v5i1.p331-336
Fagan, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Legal socialization of children and adolescents. Social Justice Research, 18(3), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-6823-3
Farah Shazwani, A. (2021 Disember 10). Ramai suami liat bayar nafkah. Sinar Harian. https://premium.sinarharian.com.my/article/154290/fokus/laporan-khas-/ramai-suami-liat-
Gau, J. M. (2015). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and legal cynicism: A test for mediation effects. Police Practice and Research, 16(5), 402–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2014.927766
Hardy, S. A., Hurst, J. L., Price, J., & Denton, M. L. (2019). The socialization of attitudes about sex and their role in adolescent pornography use. Journal of Adolescence, 72(February), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.02.007
Jackson, J., Milani, J., & Bradford, B. (2018). Empirical legitimacy and normative compliance with the law. In Farazmand, A., (ed.) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy and Governance. Springer.
Kirk, D. S. (2016). Prisoner reentry and the reproduction of legal cynicism. Social Problems, 63(2), 222–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spw003
Kirk, D. S., & Matsuda, M. (2011). Legal cynicism, collective efficacy, and the ecology of arrest. Criminology, 49(2), 443–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00226.x
Kolivoski, K. M., Shook, J. J., Johnson, H. C., Goodkind, S., Fusco, R., DeLisi, M., & Vaughn, M. G. (2016). Applying legal socialization to the child welfare system: Do youths’ perceptions of caseworkers matter? Child and Youth Care Forum, 45(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-015-9317-y
Kubrin, C. E. & Weitzer, R. (2003). Retaliatory homicide: Concentrated disadvantage and neighborhood culture. Social Problems, 50(2), 157-180. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2003.50.2.157
Li, J. Bin, Nie, Y. G., Boardley, I. D., Situ, Q. M., & Dou, K. (2014). Moral disengagement moderates the predicted effect of trait self-control on self-reported aggression. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17(4), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12072
Lutfey, K., & Mortimer, J. T. (2003). Development and socialization through the adult life course. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 183–202). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Lander, L., Howsare, J., & Byrne, M. (2013). The impact of substance use disorders on families and children: from theory to practice. Social work in public health, 28(3-4), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2013.759005
Moore, C. (2015). Moral disengagement. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6 (December), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.018
Murphy, K., Tyler, T. R., & Curtis, A. (2009). Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law? Regulation and Governance, 3(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01043.x
Piquero, A. R., Fagan, J., Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., & Odgers, C. (2005). Developmental trajectories of legal socialization among serious adolescent offenders. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 96(1), 267–298. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19915683/
Reisig, M. D., Wolfe, S. E., & Holtfreter, K. (2011). Legal cynicism, legitimacy, and criminal offending: The nonconfounding effect of low self-control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(12), 1265–1279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811424707
Trinkner, R., & Cohn, E. S. (2014). Putting the social back in legal socialization: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and cynicism in legal and nonlegal authorities. Law and Human Behavior, 38(6), 602–617. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000107
Tun Haryanti, A.R. (2022, March 23). Selangor, Johor catat kes cerai paling tinggi. BH Online. https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2022/03/937674/selangor-johor-catat-kes-cerai-paling-tinggi
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
Tyler, T. R., & Darley, J. M. (2000). Building a law-abiding society: Taking public views about morality and the legitimacy of legal authorities into account when formulating substantive law. Hofstra Law Review, 28(3), 707–739. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.23.
N/A
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode