Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2225-8329

Improving the Forecasting Power of Volatility Models

Ahmed Bensaida

Open access

Volatility models have been extensively used in risk modeling especially GARCH models under the normal distribution. Although they generate highly significant coefficient estimates, these models are known to have poor forecasting power. It is therefore interesting to develop a different approach of risk modeling to improve forecasting results. By using the generalized t-distribution in modeling the changes in the distribution of stock index returns, the results show a significant improvement in the forecasting power. Moreover, Monte Carlo simulations have confirmed that the index returns are better explained by ARCH-type models.

Anderson, G. T., and Bollerslev, T. (1998). Answering the skeptics: yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. International Economic Review, 39, pp. 855-905.
Bollerslev, T. (1987). A conditionally heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, pp. 542-547.
Brock, W. A., Dechert, W. D., Scheinkman, J. A., and LeBaron, B. (1996). A Test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Economic Reviews, 15, pp. 197-235.
Geweke, J., and Porter-Hudak, S. (1983). The Estimation and Application of Long Memory Time Series Models. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 4, pp. 221-238.
Gradshteyn, I. S., and Ryzhik, I. M. (2007). Table of integrals, series, and products. 7th edition, New York: Alain Jeffrey & Daniel Zwillinger.
Liew, V. K., and Chong, T. T. L. (2005). Autoregressive lag length selection criteria in the presence of ARCH errors. Economics Bulletin, 3, pp. 1-5.
Marsaglia, G., and Tsang, W. (2000). The ziggurat method for generating random variables. Journal of statistical software, 5, pp. 1-7.
Matsumoto, M., and Nishimura, T. (1998). Mersenne Twister: A 623-Dimensionally Equidistributed Uniform Pseudorandom Number Generator. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, 8, pp. 3-30.
Pagan, A. R., and Schwert, G. W. (1990). Alternative models for conditional stock volatility. Journal of Econometrics, 45, pp. 267-290.
Zhang, Z., Li, K. W., and Yuen, K. C. (2006). On a mixture GARCH time-series model. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27, pp. 577-597.

In-Text Citation: (Bensaida, 2012)
To Cite this Article: Bensaida, A. (2012). Improving the Forecasting Power of Volatility Models. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 2(3), 43–57.