ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Creativity in education plays an important role in fostering creative, critical thinking and innovation, especially for teachers in providing students with a more meaningful learning experience. In this regard, TL planning is the main building for teachers in practicing creativity to implement more organized and systematic teaching guided by the various needs of students and the subjects taught. This study aims to develop and validate the Engineering Drawing Teacher Creativity Practice (CPT-ED) Teaching and Learning Planning Framework. A mixed-methods approach is an option in the study design. Sequential Mixed Exploration Method to explore the constructs, sub-constructs and elements of the CPT-ED Teaching and Learning Planning Framework (TL) at the qualitative study phase stage. However, this study focuses on the quantitative phase of developing and validating the research framework by using two data analysis methods, namely Exploration Factor Analysis (EFA) and Validation Factor Analysis (CFA) which are analyzed using IBM-SPSS AMOS 23 software. The data was collected using a six-point Likert scale questionnaire from 300 teachers comprising ED teachers in nine SMTs across Malaysia and teachers teaching Technical Communication Graphics (TCG) subjects in Secondary Schools in Malaysia. This research highlights how TL Planning teachers' creative practices improve the effectiveness and smoothness of the overall teaching process and provide a meaningful experience to students. The findings of the study show that there are four sub-constructs and 15 TL elements of CPT-ED planning. The findings also show that the listed CPT-ED planning TL framework has met the characteristics of the appropriate model and has been validated. This study was conducted because of the importance of creativity in teaching as well as the need for guidance and reference for creative teaching practices, especially for the subject of Engineering Drawing (ED) referring to the research problems that have been identified.
Abu, N. E., & Eu, L. K. (2014). Hubungan Antara Sikap, minat, pengajaran guru dan pengaruh rakan sebaya terhadap pencapaian matematik tambahan Tingkatan 4. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2241-5
Ahmad, A., & Jinggan, N. (2015). Pengaruh kompetensi kemahiran guru dalam pengajaran terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Sejarah. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 3(2), 1–11.
Alanazi, M. H. (2019). A Study of the Pre-Service Trainee Teachers Problems in Designing Lesson Plans. Arab World English Journal, 10(1), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no1.15
Alfiani, S., & Nurcholis, I. A. (2023). Strategies for Designing Effective Lesson Plan in Micro Teaching Practices Perceived by Indonesian EFL Student Teachers. English Learning Innovation, 4(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v4i1.17647
Amran, N. F. N., Hashim, N. F., Jumadi, M. K. N., Mohamad Jamil, N., Ibrahim, N., Sagin, C., & Husin, M. R. (2022). Pengurusan Alam Pembelajaran di Sekolah Kebangsaan Nanga Temalat Sarawak. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.jhass-0402.388
Awang, Z. (2015). SEM Made Simple: A Gentle Approach Structural Equation Modeling. MPWS Rich Publication.
Awi, N. A. L., & Zulkifli, H. (2021). Amalan kreativiti guru pendidikan islam dalam pembelajaran abad ke-21. ASEAN Comparative Education Research Journal on Islam and Civilization (ACER-J), 4(1), 40–54.
Batjo, N., & Ambotang, A. S. (2019). Pengaruh Pengajaran Guru Terhadap Kualiti Pengajaran Guru. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 4(2), 30–42.
Brauer, R., Ormiston, J., & Beausaert, S. (2024). Creativity-Fostering Teacher Behaviors in Higher Education?: A Transdisciplinary Systematic Literature Review. Review of Educational Research, 0(0), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241258226
Broadfoot, P. (1988). Assessing teacher performance. Journal of Education Policy, 3(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093880030104
Brouwers, S., & Vijver, F. J. (2015). Contextualizing intelligence in assessment: the next step. Human. Human Resource Management Review, 25(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2014.09.006
Corazza, G. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., Beghetto, R. A., & Lubart, T. (2021). Intelligence and creativity in the space-time continuum for education, business, and development. Journal of Creativity, 31, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2021.100003
Dagang, M. Y. (2016). Amalan Kreativiti Pengajaran Guru Pendidikan Islam Di Sekolah Negeri Johor. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.
Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., & Seifert, C. M. (2014). Teaching creativity in engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(3), 417–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20048
Duda, H. J., Awang, I. S., & Andri, A. (2018). PKM Pelatihan Pemanfaatan Bahan Bekas Sebagai Media Pembelajaran IPA bagi Kelompok Guru IPA. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 8(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.30999/jpkm.v8i1.195
Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683
Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and Sampling Methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149
Fajriati, N., & Murtiyasa, B. (2023). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Menggunakan Multimedia Interaktif. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 07(1), 945–957.
Fricker Jr, R. D. (2012). Sampling Methods for Web and email survey. In The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020055.n11
Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2018). Are Teachers ’ Implicit Theories of Creativity Related to the Recognition of Their Students ’ Creativity?? Journal of Creative Behavior, 52(2), 156–167. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1002/jocb.140Citations: 54
Gunawan, K. D. H., Liliasari, S., Kaniawati, I., & Setiawan, W. (2020). Exploring science teachers’ lesson plans by the implementation of intelligent tutoring systems in blended learning environments. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4776–4783. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081049
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. (Seventh). Pearson Educational Limited. https://doi.org/10.2307/2007941
Hamdan, N., Mei Heong, Y., Jailani, A., Masran, S. H., Boon Ching, K., Tze Kiong, T., & Mohamad, M. M. (2021). Penggunaan Gaya Berfikir Dan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi Bagi Menyelesaikan Masalah Dalam Penghasilan Produk: Analisis Keperluan. Sains Insani, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.33102/sainsinsani.vol6no2.311
Hartini, S., Siregar, M., & Arifi, A. (2020). Implementasi pendidikan karakter di MTs Negeri Kabupaten Klaten. Journal Basic Of Education, 4(1), 14–29.
Hidayat, D. N., Fitriah, Mahlil, & Mason, J. (2023). Factors Impacting English Teachers’ Creativity in Teaching English as a Foreign Language in Indonesia. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(1), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.26145
Irfani, R. N. (2022). Peran Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Pasca Pandemi Covid-19. JISPE: Journal of Islamic Primary Education, 3(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.51875/jispe.v3i1.46
Kaviza, M., & Ibrahim, C. S. (2022). Penerokaan Stail Berfikir Sternberg dalam kalangan Murid Sejarah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(12), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i12.2176 Penerokaan
Kit, C. S., & Mahmud, M. S. (2023). Keberkesanan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Perisian Terhadap Penguasaan Geometri dalam kalangan Murid Tahun Enam?: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur ( Effectiveness of Software-Based Learning in Mastery Geometry among Year Six Students?: A Literature Review ). Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i1.2037
Maba, W., & Mantra, I. B. N. (2018). The primary school teachers’ competence in implementing the 2013 curriculum. SHS Web of Conferences, 42. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200035
Marimuthu, S., & Malayalam, N. (2020). Sosioekonomi Keluarga Sebagai Faktor Pendorong Gejala Gengsterisme Murid India Pendidikan Moral di Sekolah Menengah. MJSSH: Mualim Journal of Social Science Ang Humanities, 4(4), 60–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33306/mjssh/97
Mesran, M., Nasution, S. D., Suginam, S., Afriany, J., & Ramdhan, W. (2021). Optimalisasi Penggunaan Software Zoom dan Google Meet Dalam Meningkatkan Efektifitas Pembelajaran Daring. Journal of Social Responsibility Projects by Higher Education Forum, 2(2), 94–97. https://doi.org/10.47065/jrespro.v2i2.987
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
Mohamad, E. A., & Abd Karim, A. (2023). Analisis Keperluan: Pembangunan Modul DrawMe (DM) dalam Meningkatkan Kemahiran Matematik Berayat Sekolah Rendah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i3.2151
Mustafa, U. A. (2017). Amalan Pengajaran Guru dan Kreativiti Pelajar Terhadap Strategi peluang perniagaan dalam kalangan pelajar pengajian keusahawanan Sekolah Menengah Teknik. Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Mohd Nor, R., Nik Yusoff, N. M. R., & Haron, H. (2020). Meneroka Kaedah Pengajaran Guru Cemerlang Pendidikan Seni Visual Selangor ( GCPSV ): Satu Kajian Kes Abstrak Exploring Teaching Method of Selangor Arts Excellent Teacher?: A Case Study Abstract Pengenalan Metod Kajian. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(5), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i5.394
Mohd Taib, M. T., & Mustapha, R. (2017). Kemudahan Prasarana Dalam Pelaksanaan Mata Pelajaran Teknologi Kejuruteraan, Lukisan Kejuruteraan dan Reka Cipta di Sekolah Menengah Harian Malaysia. Sains Humanika, 9(1–5). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-5.1171
Muis, K. R., Psaradellis, C., Lajoie, S. P., Di Leo, I., & Chevrier, M. (2015). The role of epistemic emotions in mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 172–185. https://doi.org/185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.003
Mustaffa, Z., Hussin, Z., & Sulaiman, A. M. (2021). Kaedah Pengajaran Pedagogi Terbeza dalam konteks gaya belajar dan keadilan kepada murid?: Pemikiran Imam Ibn Sahnun. GJAT, 11(2), 1–11.
Namdar, B., & Kucuk, M. (2018). Preservice Science Teachers’ Practices of Critiquing and Revising 5E Lesson Plans. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(6), 468–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1469188
Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Allyn and Bacon.
Ngatiman, S. (2018). Konstruk Amalan Kreativiti Pengajaran Guru Lukisan Kejuruteraan. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Ngatiman, S., & Saud, M. S. (2022). Kajian Awalan Tahap Amalan Kreativiti Pengajaran Guru Lukisan Kejuruteraan. In I. P. G. K. D. Aman (Ed.), Prosiding SeDAR 2022 (pp. 394–413). Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Darulaman.
Nurhayani, Yuanita, S. K. S., Permana, A. I., & Eliza, D. (2020). TPACK (Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge) untuk Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru PAUD. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(1), 179–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i1.1852 ISSN
Pasiangan, S., Hasbi, H., & Zainuddin, F. (2020). Counteracting the Social Media: The Role of Islamic Education Teachers’ at SMAN 4 Tana Toraja. International Journal of Asian Education, 1(3), 169–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v1i3.69
Patfield, S., Gore, J., Prieto, E., Fray, L., & Sincock, K. (2022). Towards quality teaching in higher education?: pedagogy-focused academic development for enhancing practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 00(00), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2022.2103561
Ramadani, C., & Sutriyani. (2023). Concept of Arabic Language Learning Management Strategy in Madrasah. Tanwir Arabiyyah: Arabic As Foreign Language Journal, 3(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.31869/aflj.v3i1.3958
Richards, J. C. (2010). Competence and Performance in Language Teaching. 102 RELC Journal, 41(2), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210372953
Rushdi, N. M., & Amran, M. S. (2020). Kreativiti Dalam Proses Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Persidangan Antarabangsa Sains Sosial Dan Kemanusiaan Ke-5 (PASAK5 2020), 322–332.
Sahrir, M. S., Osman, N., & Muhammad, I. S. (2020). Aplikasi “Konsep 4C” Pembelajaran Abad ke-21 dalam Kalangan Guru Pelajar Sarjana Mod Pengajian Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Cuti Sekolah UIAM. E-Jurnal Bahasa Dan Linguistik, 2(1), 12–22. http://ejbl.kuis.edu.my
Samsudin, M. Z., Hassan, R., Hasan, A., & Shamsuddin, M. A. D. (2013). Amalan kreativiti guru dalam Pengajaran Pendidikan Asas Vokasional (PAV). Technology, Education and Science International Conference (TESIC), October 2014, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4265.2161
Sari, L. M. (2019). Evaluasi dalam Pendidikan Islam. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.24042/atjpi.v9i2.3624
Sarifuddin, N., & Ahmad, A. (2023). Keberkesanan Pembelajaran Koperatif Menggunakan Kaedah Jigsaw II dalam Penulisan Esei Sejarah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(1), 2504–8564. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i1.2030
Seng, O. J., & Othman, S. (2018). Tahap Pengetahuan dan sikap Guru terhadap pendekatan didik hibur dalam pengajaran Bahasa Melayu. International Journal of Education and Training, 4(2), 1–9.
Setiawan, A., Munir, A., & Suhartono, S. (2019). Creative Teachers in Teaching Speaking Performance. Pedagogy?: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v7i2.1670
Sidek, R., Halim, L., Buang, N. A., & Mohamad Arsad, N. (2020). Fostering Scientific Creativity in Teaching and Learning Science in Schools: A Systematic Review. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 6(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v6i1.7149
Wang, X. (2022). Piano Information Teaching Mode Based on Deep Learning Algorithm. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6205763
Wirawan, R., Awal Nur, M., & Syahraeni, R. (2020). Aplikasi Pembelajaran Matematika Interaktif Berbasis Multimedia. JARTIKA?: Jurnal Riset Teknologi Dan Inovasi Pendidikan, 3(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.36765/jartika.v3i1.28
Yasin, R., Mustapha, R., Minghat, A. D., Jusoff, K., Ishar, A., & Shamsudin, S. (2012). Pelaksanaan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Lukisan Kejuruteraan di Sekolah Menengah. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 27, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3835(85)90058-8
Yonkaitis, C. F. (2020). Lesson plan basics: Teaching in the classroom with confidence. Nasn School Nurse, 35(3), 136–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1942602x19893038
Ngatiman, S., & Saud, M. S. (2025). Develop and Validate the Creativity Practice of Engineering Drawing Teachers (CPT-ED) Teaching and Learning Planning Framework. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(1), 1883–1900.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode