Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Assessment Level Implementation of School Improvement Specialist Coaches Program: Efficient Teaching Coaches Features

Salefah Mat Salleh, Norasmah Othman

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i2/5690

Open access

This study was conducted to identify the teachers' perceptions towards the implementation of the School Improvement Specialist Coaches (SISC+) program from SISC+ features as an effective teaching guide. SISC+ is assigned to guide teachers in low-performing schools and are in band 6 and band 7. So SISC+ needs to serve as an efficient teaching coaches so that the objective of setting up the SISC+ program can be fully achieved. The methodology of this study was quantitative using five-point Likert scale questionnaires and 400 teachers were involved in the study. The data obtained were analyzed using the IBM SPSS version 22.0 software with reference to mean, percentage and standard deviation. The findings show that overall SISC+ features are at a high level when it is able to meet the needs of effective counselors in terms of roles, knowledge, feedback, personal characteristic and role model. In conclusion, SISC+ needs to meet the requirements as an efficient teaching coaches and in accordance with the guidelines set so that more positive effects will be obtained.

Abiddin, N.Z. (2006). Effective practice in graduate student supervision using the mentoring and
coaching approaches. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, May 2006.
Syahiran, M., Radzuwan, A. R., Kamariah, Y., & Safawati Basirah, Z. (2016). Exploring the
School Improvement Specialist Coaches’ Experience in Coaching English Language Teachers. Arab World English Journal, 7(3), 271–285.
Alin, L. & Turnock, C. (2007). Assessing Student Performance in Work-based Learning. Making
Practice Based Learning work. Retrieved from http://www.practicebasedlearning.org/resources/materials/docs/Assessment%20in%20the%20Work%20Place/page_01.htm
Andrews, J. (2002). Workplace Mentoring Guide, Connection State Department of Education,
Middletown. Retrieved from
http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/lib/sde/PDF/DEPS/Career/WB/mentoring.pdf.
Bhojani, S. (2007). Examining Mentor/Mentee Attribute and The Nature Of Feedback At Pre-
Service Professional Development Science Program. Master’s Thesis, California State University. Department Science Education.
Bond, T.G. & Fox, C.M. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model: FundamentalMeasurement in the
Human Sciences. Edisi Ke-2. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publisers. Mahwah, New Jersey. London.
Borman, J., & Feger, S. (2006). Instructional coaching: Key themes from the literature.
Providence, RI: The Education Alliance at Brown University.
Boud, D. & Solomon, N. (2001). Work-based Learning – A new Higher Education. Buckingham:
Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, 2001, ISBN 0 335 20580.
Chadd, J. & Anderson, M.A. (2005). Illinois Work-Based Learning Programs: Worksite mentor
knowledge and training, career and technical education research, 30(1), pp 25-45. 2005. Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/CTER/v30n1/pdf/chadd.pdf.
Cohen, R.J. (2010). Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Test and
Measurement. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2009). Recognizing and enhancing teacher effectiveness. The
International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 3(1), 1-24.
Denton, C., & Hasbrouck, J. (2009). A description of instructional coaching and its relationship
to consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 19, 150-175.
Deussen, T., Coskie, T., Robinson, L., Autio, E., & Institute of Education Sciences (ED), W. (2007).
"Coach" can mean many things: Five categories of literacy coaches in reading first. Issues & answers. REL 2007-No. 005. Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest. Retrieved from ERIC database.
Dole, J. A. (2004). The changing role of the reading specialist in school reform. Reading Teacher,
57(5), 462-471.
Donovan, P., Hannigan, K. & Crowe, D. (2001). The learning transfer system approach to
estimating the benefits of training: empirical evidence. Journal of European Industrial Training 25: 2-4.
Edward, J.K. (2000). The valeu of Co-curricular activities. Retrieved from
htttp/www/principals.org.
Erawan, P. (2014). Teacher Training through School-Based Program in Participatory Learning
Promotion. Global Conference on Contemporary Issues in Education, GLOBE-EDU 2014, 12-14 July 2014, Las Vegas, USA.
Fatimah, T. (2009). Penilaian pelaksanaan Program Pemulihan Khas di sekolahsekolah rendah di
Negeri Selangor daripada perspektif guru besar dan guru pemulihan khas. PhD’s Thesis. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Fawcett, D.L. (2002). Mentoring—what it is and how to make it work. AORN Journal; 75(5):950–
954.
Feger, S., Woleck, K., & Hickman, P. (2004). How to develop a coaching eye. Journal of Staff
Development, 25(2), 14-18. Retrieved from ERIC database.
Ferguson, L. (2010). Becoming a mentor, University of Saskatchewan. Retrieved from
http://www.usask.ca/nursing/cne/elearning/20100317/Mentoring%20handout.
%20CNE%20March%202010.pdf.
Fisher, R. (2007). Dialogic teaching: developing thinking and metacogn

In-Text Citation: (Salleh & Othman, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Salleh, S. M., & Othman, N. (2019). Assessment Level Implementation Of School Improvement Specialist Coaches Program: Efficient Teaching Coaches Features. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(3), 142–158.