ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The teaching and learning landscape in higher learning institutions are changing from teacher-centered to student-centered learning. However, the students’ lack of engagement in classrooms is found to become one of the drawbacks in the implementation of student-centered learning. Aiming to address the problem of students’ lack of engagement, this research is carried out to investigate the impact of two teaching strategies i.e. ‘think-pair-share’ and ‘wait time’ on the teaching and learning of undergraduates. The methodology employed in the study is qualitative, engaging in action research design and divided into three stages of study, (i) problem identification (ii) action implementation, and (iii) evaluation. Two cycles of investigation were carried out, involving the implementation of “think-pair-share” in the first cycle, and in the second cycle, “think-pair-share” and “wait-time”. The data sources for the evaluation were three-folds, (i) lecturer’s observation (ii) reflection by the students and lecturer, and (iii) activity sheets by the students. The data are loaded into the computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software of ATLAS.ti version 8 for the purpose of analysis and generating the reports of the analysis. The study revealed that both teaching strategies of “think-pair-share” and “wait-time” have tremendously improved the student engagement in the classes. Additionally, the students’ learning experience have enhanced with the implementation of these two teaching strategies. And finally, the lecturer’s teaching ability also improved. Hopefully, the findings of the study would contribute to the literature on the subject of student engagement and teaching and learning strategies particularly, and other subjects of the higher education level generally.
Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J. & Pagani, L. S. (2009). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 651-670.
Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802-1811.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. sage.
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014, September). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. In Oncology nursing forum (Vol. 41, No. 5).
Duff, P. A., & Seror, J. (2005). Computers and qualitative data analysis: Paper, pens, and highlighters vs. screen, mouse, and keyboard. Tesol Quarterly, 39(2), 321-328.
Flick, U. (2004). Triangulation in qualitative research. A companion to qualitative research, 3, 178-183.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept: State of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–119.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 67-73.
Kirton, A., Hallam, S., Peffers, J., Robertson, P., & Stobart, G. (2007). Revolution, evolution or a Trojan horse? Piloting assessment for learning in some Scottish primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 605–627
Mills, G. (2003). Action Research: A guide for the teacher researcher. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
Reinhart, S. C. (2000). Never say anything a kid can say! Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 5, 478–483.
Rowe, M. B. (1974). Wait?time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic, and fate control: Part one?wait?time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11(2), 81-94.
Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time: slowing down may be a way of speeding up! Journal of Teacher Education, 37 (1), 43-50.
Sampsel, A. (2013). Finding the Effects of Think-Pair-Share on Student Confidence and Participation. Honors Projects Paper 28.
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246.
Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Lancaster: Department of Educational Research Lancaster University.
Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. The Guilford Press. New York, London.
In-Text Citation: (Mohamad, Mustafa, Hanafiah, Ariffin, & Arshad, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Mohamad, A. M., Mustafa, E., Hanafiah, N. A. H., Ariffin, N. M., & Arshad, A. H. M. (2019). Impact of “Think-Pair-Share” and “Wait-Time” on Teaching and Learning Undergraduates: An Action Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(7), 843–861.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode