ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) has raised questions about its environmental, social, and economic sustainability. This study investigates the influence of three critical factors environmental impact of AI, e-waste and lifecycle implications, and green accounting practices on the development of sustainable AI in Bangladesh. Data were collected through a structured survey and analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) with AMOS. The results show that all three constructs significantly predict sustainable AI, with green accounting practices exerting the strongest influence (? = 0.41), followed by environmental impact (? = 0.32) and e-waste considerations (? = 0.27). Together, these predictors explain 65 percent of the variance in sustainable AI, highlighting their collective importance. The findings suggest that addressing energy use and carbon emissions, managing e-waste responsibly, and institutionalizing green accounting are essential steps for promoting sustainable AI. From a theoretical perspective, the study extends sustainability and accounting frameworks into the AI domain. From a practical perspective, it offers guidance for policymakers, industry leaders, and organizations in developing economies. The results contribute to the global discussion on responsible AI by providing empirical evidence from the context of Bangladesh
Jegham, N., Abdelatti, M., Elmoubarki, L., & Hendawi, A. (2025). How hungry is AI? Benchmarking energy, water, and carbon footprint of LLM inference (arXiv:2505.09598).
Mahmood, S., Rahman, M., & Karim, R. (2021). E-waste management challenges in Bangladesh: Policy gaps and future directions. Environmental Research and Policy, 28(3), 211-227.
OECD. (2022). Measuring the environmental impacts of artificial intelligence: Compute and applications. OECD Publishing.
Rahaman, M. M., Akter, S., Hossain, M. A., Chowdhury, A. R. B., & Wu, R. (2024). Green accounting and reporting in Bangladesh’s pharmaceutical and textile industries: A holistic perspective. PLOS ONE, 19(9), e0310236.
Rahman, M., Akter, S., & Hasan, M. (2023). Green accounting practices and environmental performance: Evidence from emerging economies. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 11(2), 145–162.
Bhattacharjee, A., & Juman, M. K. I. (2020). Does delay or scarcity in working capital increase unexpected financial risk for women entrepreneurs in the developing country.International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 8(8), 433–446.
Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2018). Contemporary environmental accounting: Issues, concepts, and practice. Routledge.
The Guardian. (2025, June 27). Google’s emissions up 51% as AI electricity demand derails efforts to go green. The Guardian.
Time. (2025, June 19). Some AI prompts can cause 50 times more CO? emissions than others. Time Magazine.
Rahman, M., Karim, T., & Sultana, N. (2023). Green accounting practices and their role in achieving sustainable development goals: Evidence from emerging economies. Journal of Environmental Management and Accounting, 45(3), 210–225.
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019). Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3645–3650.
Henderson, P., Hu, J., Romoff, J., Brunskill, E., Jurafsky, D., & Pineau, J. (2020). Towards the systematic reporting of the energy and carbon footprints of machine learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(248), 1–43.
Wu, Z., Zhang, X., Li, M., & Wang, Y. (2022). Life-cycle assessment of artificial intelligence systems: A review of energy and environmental impacts. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 35, 100714.
Polas, M. R. H., Juman, K. I., Karim, A. M., Tabash, M. I., & Hossain, M. I. (2020). Do service quality dimensions increase the customer–brand relationship among Gen Z? The mediating role of customer perception between service quality (SERVQUAL) and brand satisfaction. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(4), 1050–1070.
Tom’s Guide. (2025, August 15). Google breaks down the environmental cost of an AI prompt—is it really that tiny? Tom’s Guide.
Bai, X., Wang, L., & Xu, J. (2023). Environmental impacts of artificial intelligence: A life-cycle perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 410, 137089.
Henderson, P., Hu, J., Romoff, J., Brunskill, E., Jurafsky, D., & Pineau, J. (2020). Towards the systematic reporting of the energy and carbon footprints of machine learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(248), 1–43.
Bhattacharjee, A., Bansal, V., & Juman, M. K. I. (2021). COVID-19 emergency: Faux healthcare service causes distress and life dissatisfaction. Asian Journal of Medicine and Health, 18(12), 53–61.
Khan, S., & Akter, F. (2022). Barriers to AI adoption in developing economies: Evidence from the ICT sector of Bangladesh. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(5), 45–59.
Rahman, M., Karim, T., & Sultana, N. (2023). Green accounting practices and their role in achieving sustainable development goals: Evidence from emerging economies. Journal of Environmental Management and Accounting, 45(3), 210–225.
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019). Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3645–3650.
Bhattacharjee, A., Ghosh, A., Juman, M. K. I., & Hossen, M. (2024). Augmented intelligence for knowledge management and green education in the post-COVID-19 era. In Integrating generative AI in education to achieve sustainable development goals (pp. 47–71). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Wu, Z., Zhang, X., Li, M., & Wang, Y. (2022). Life-cycle assessment of artificial intelligence systems: A review of energy and environmental impacts. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 35, 100714.
Hasan, M. A., & Sultana, R. (2022). E-waste management practices and policy implications for sustainable ICT growth in Bangladesh. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(6), 560–574.
Washington Post. (2025, August 26). AI is an energy guzzler. These things you’re doing are worse. The Washington Post.
York, R., & McGee, J. (2017). Understanding the Jevons Paradox. Environmental Sociology, 3(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1247138
Jegham, N., Abdelatti, M., Elmoubarki, L., & Hendawi, A. (2025). How hungry is AI? Benchmarking energy, water, and carbon footprint of LLM inference (arXiv:2505.09598). arXiv.
Juman, M. K. I., Yeasmin, K. F., Chowdhury, M. T. I., Karim, A. M., & Synthia, T. I. C. (2025). Sustainable business transformation: Design guidelines for integrating conceptual ethics in sustainability business evaluation in Dhaka, Bangladesh. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 14(3), 849–869.
Rahman, M., Akter, S., & Hasan, M. (2023). Green accounting practices and environmental performance: Evidence from emerging economies. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 11(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.5890/JEAM.2023.02
The Guardian. (2025, June 27). Google’s emissions up 51% as AI electricity demand derails efforts to go green. The Guardian
Time. (2025, June 19). Some AI prompts can cause 50 times more CO? emissions than others. Time Magazine.
Tom’s Guide. (2025, August 15). Google breaks down the environmental cost of an AI prompt—is it really that tiny? Tom’s Guide. https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/google-breaks-down-the-environmental-cost-of-an-ai-prompt
Washington Post. (2025, August 26). AI is an energy guzzler. These things you’re doing are worse. The Washington Post.
De Vries, A. (2023). The growing energy footprint of artificial intelligence. Joule, 7(6), 1165–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2023.05.001
Guardian. (2025, June 27). Google’s emissions up 51% as AI electricity demand derails efforts to go green. The Guardian.
Bhattacharjee, A., & Juman, M. K. I. (2020). Does delay or scarcity in working capital increase unexpected financial risk for women entrepreneurs in developing countries? International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 8(8), 433–446. IJECM.
Haque, M., & Rashid, M. M. (2022). Artificial intelligence adoption in Bangladesh: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of ICT for Development, 19(2), 45–60.
Jegham, N., Abdelatti, M., Elmoubarki, L., & Hendawi, A. (2025). How hungry is AI? Benchmarking energy, water, and carbon footprint of LLM inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09598.
Luccioni, A. S., Viguier, S., & Ligozat, A. L. (2023). Estimating the carbon footprint of deep learning training. Patterns, 4(6), 100755.
Patterson, D., Gonzalez, J., Le, Q., Liang, C., & Dean, J. (2021). Carbon emissions and large neural network training. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 1–10.
Rahaman, M. M., Akter, S., Hossain, M. A., Chowdhury, A. R. B., & Wu, R. (2024). Green accounting and reporting in Bangladesh’s pharmaceutical and textile industries: A holistic perspective. PLOS ONE, 19(9), e0310236.
Tom’s Guide. (2025, August 15). Google breaks down the environmental cost of an AI prompt—is it really that tiny? Tom’s Guide.
Bhattacharjee, A., Bansal, V., & Juman, M. K. I. (2021). COVID-19 emergency: Faux healthcare service causes distress and life dissatisfaction.Asian Journal of Medicine and Health, 18(12), 53–61.
York, R., & McGee, J. (2017). Understanding the Jevons Paradox. Environmental Sociology, 3(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1247138
Baldé, C. P., Forti, V., Gray, V., Kuehr, R., & Stegmann, P. (2024). The Global E-Waste Monitor 2024. United Nations University.
Forti, V., Baldé, C. P., Kuehr, R., & Bel, G. (2020). The Global E-Waste Monitor 2020: Quantities, flows, and the circular economy potential. United Nations University.
Mahmood, S., Rahman, M., & Karim, R. (2021). E-waste management challenges in Bangladesh: Policy gaps and future directions. Environmental Research and Policy, 28(3), 211–227.
Masanet, E., Shehabi, A., Lei, N., Smith, S., & Koomey, J. (2020). Recalibrating global data center energy-use estimates. Science, 367(6481), 984–986.
Rahman, M., & Akter, S. (2022). Policy analysis of e-waste management in Bangladesh: Current status and future directions. Journal of Environmental Policy Studies, 25(2), 177–193.
Hossain, A., Khan, M. Y. H., Hossain, M. M., Rony, M. B., Juman, M. K., Sultana, F., Rahaman, A., & Yusuf, K. M. (2024). E-shopping decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: The mediating role of consumers’ psychology. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(9), 2966.
Stoll, C., Klaaßen, L., & Gallersdörfer, U. (2022). The carbon footprint of ICT infrastructure: A lifecycle assessment perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 95, 106774.
Watari, T., McLellan, B. C., Giurco, D., & Dominish, E. (2021). Total material requirement for the global energy transition to 2050: A focus on rare-earth elements. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 168, 105466.
Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga, C. (2014). Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 395–413.
Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability… and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62.
Islam, S. I., Hassan, R., & Sultana, T. (2023). Evaluating the success of green accounting practices in the banking sector of Bangladesh. International Journal of Accounting and Finance Studies, 6(2), 45–59.
Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2021). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 96(6), 169–198.
Luccioni, A. S., Viguier, S., & Ligozat, A. L. (2023). Estimating the carbon footprint of deep learning training. Patterns, 4(6), 100755.
Rahaman, M. M., Akter, S., Hossain, M. A., Chowdhury, A. R. B., & Wu, R. (2024). Green accounting and reporting in Bangladesh’s pharmaceutical and textile industries: A holistic perspective. PLOS ONE, 19(9), e0310236.
Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2018). Contemporary environmental accounting: Issues, concepts, and practice. Routledge.
Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
Haque, M., & Rashid, M. M. (2022). Artificial intelligence adoption in Bangladesh: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of ICT for Development, 19(2), 45–60.
Jegham, N., Abdelatti, M., Elmoubarki, L., & Hendawi, A. (2025). How hungry is AI? Benchmarking energy, water, and carbon footprint of LLM inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09598.
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399.
Patterson, D., Gonzalez, J., Le, Q., Liang, C., & Dean, J. (2021). Carbon emissions and large neural network training. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 1–10.
Rahman, M., & Akter, S. (2022). Policy analysis of e-waste management in Bangladesh: Current status and future directions. Journal of Environmental Policy Studies, 25(2), 177–193.
Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., … & Nerini, F. F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications, 11(1), 233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y
York, R., & McGee, J. (2017). Understanding the Jevons paradox. Environmental Sociology, 3(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1247138
Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Baldé, C. P., Forti, V., Gray, V., Kuehr, R., & Stegmann, P. (2024). The global e-waste monitor 2024. United Nations University, International Telecommunication Union, & International Solid Waste Association.
Jegham, A., Alloghani, M., & Hussain, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence for sustainability: A systematic review. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 37, 100870.
Luccioni, A. S., Viguier, S., & Ligozat, A. L. (2023). Estimating the carbon footprint of BLOOM, a 176B parameter language model. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 1212–1224). ACM.
Mahmood, S., Rahman, S., & Sultana, T. (2021). Electronic waste management in Bangladesh: Policy gaps and future challenges. Environmental Challenges, 3, 100059.
Patterson, D., Gonzalez, J., Le, Q., Liang, C., & Dean, J. (2021). Carbon emissions and large neural network training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.10350. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.10350
Rahman, M., Uddin, S., & Alam, M. (2023). Green accounting practices and sustainability performance: Evidence from emerging economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 392, 136239.
Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2018). Business cases and corporate engagement with sustainability: Differentiating ethical motivations. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(2), 241–259.
Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., Felländer, A., Langhans, S. D., Tegmark, M., & Fuso Nerini, F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the sustainable development goals. Nature Communications, 11, 233.
Yeasmin, K. F., Juman, M. K. I., Chowdhur, M. T. I., Synthia, T. I. C., Hossain, M., & Jalil, A. (2025). Towards Sustainable AI: Green Accounting-Based Model for Measuring the Environmental Cost of Intelligent Systems. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 15(4), 156-181.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode