ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
Purpose: Systemically important banks (SIBs) play a critical role in financial stability and are key implementers of green credit policies in China. This study examines the impact of green credit policies on the risk-taking behavior of Chinese banks by comparing systemically important banks (SIBs) with non-systemically important banks (non-SIBs). The analysis is framed by information asymmetry and risk–return trade-off theories and draws on institutional and stakeholder perspectives to explain why systemic importance shapes the effect of green credit on risk-taking. Design/methodology/approach: This research utilizes data from 36 Chinese banks from 2010 to 2023, employing fixed-effect panel regressions and lagged risk-taking data to control for endogeneity. The sample is split into two periods for robustness testing: 2010–2015 and 2016– 2023. Findings: The results show that green credit has an insignificant effect on overall bank risk-taking activities. However, it significantly reduces the risk-taking of systemically important banks (SIBs), particularly after the introduction of the Guidelines for Green Finance in 2016. For SIBs, increases in the share of green credit are associated with economically meaningful declines in non-performing loan ratios. Research limitations/implications: This study highlights the heterogeneous impacts of green credit on different types of banks. By linking these heterogeneous effects to the combined insights of information asymmetry, risk–return trade-off, institutional, and stakeholder theories, this study provides valuable insights for policymakers and bank managers to improve risk management and support sustainable development in China’s banking sector. Practical implications: This study suggests that green credit policies are more effective in curbing excessive risk-taking among systemically important banks (SIBs) than among non-systemically important banks, implying that regulatory frameworks and policy incentives may need to be differentiated according to bank size, systemic importance, and risk profile to enhance stability of the financial system in China. For bank managers, the findings underscore the importance of integrating environmental risk assessments and sustainable financing principles into corporate governance and credit risk management. Originality/value: While existing literature primarily explores the relationship between green finance and financial performance or stability, this research examines how systemic importance moderates this relationship. By conducting robust split-period analysis around the implementation of the 2016 Guidelines for Green Finance, this study offers a deeper understanding of policy effectiveness and institutional heterogeneity in the Chinese banking system.
Abbas, F., & Ali, S. (2020). Dynamics of bank capital ratios and risk-taking: Evidence from US commercial banks. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8 (1), 1838693. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1838693.
Adamowicz, M. (2022). Green deal, green growth and green economy as a means of support for attaining the sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 14(10), 5901. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105901.
Afzal, A., Rasoulinezhad, E., & Malik, Z. (2022). Green finance and sustainable development in Europe. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 5150-5163. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.2024081.
Akerlof, G.A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431.
Alnabulsi, K., Kozarevi?, E., & Hakimi, A. (2022). Assessing the determinants of non-performing loans under financial crisis and health crisis: evidence from the MENA banks. Cogent Economics & Finance,10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2124665
An, X., Ding, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Green credit and bank risk: does corporate social responsibility matter? Finance Research Letters, 58, 104349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104349.
Arhinful, R., Mensah, L., Gyamfi, B. A., & Obeng, H. A. (2025). The influence of non-performing loans on environmental innovation: an institutional theory perspective – insights from U.S banks. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2538710
Batrancea, L., Pop, M.C., Rathnaswamy, M.M., Batrancea, I., & Rus, M.-I. (2021). An empirical investigation on the transition process toward a green economy. Sustainability, 13 (23), 13151. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313151.
CBIRC (2012). The green credit guidelines. China: China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission. Retrieved June 15, 2024, from https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2012/content_2163593.htm
CBIRC (2021). The People's Bank of China and the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission releasing the list of systemically important banks in China. China: China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission. Retrieved June 15, 2024, from http://www.pbc.gov.cn/huobizhengceersi/214481/3868581/3868587/4360688/index.html
Chen, S., & Yang, Q. (2024). Renewable energy technology innovation and urban green economy efficiency. Journal of Environmental Management, 353, 120130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120130.
Duan, D., & Liu, K. (2025). Development of fintech, green credit, and risk-taking in commercial banks, Finance Research Letters, 86 (E), 108687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108687.
European Commission (2019). The European green deal: Striving to be the first climate-neutral continent. Retrieved June 15, 2024, from https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en.
Feng, Y., Pan, Y., Sun, C., & Niu, J. (2024). Assessing the effect of green credit on risk-taking of commercial banks in China: Further analysis on the two-way Granger causality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 437, 140698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140698.
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.
Hafeez, B., Li, X., Kabir, M.H., & Tripe, D. (2022). Measuring bank risk: Forward-looking z-score. International Review of Financial Analysis, 80, 102039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102039.
Harjoto, M., & Laksmana, I. (2018). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Risk Taking and Firm Value. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3202-y
Hong, M., Li, Z., & Drakeford, B. (2021). Do the green credit guidelines affect corporate green technology innovation? Empirical research from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (4), 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041682.
Ikram, U., & Akhtar, S. (2021). Green banking, corporate governance, and performance of selected SAARC countries. Review of Economics and Development Studies, 7 (4), 543 - 559.
Jiajia, L., Kun, G., Fangcheng, T., Yahan, W., & Shouyang, W. (2023). The effect of the disposal of non-performing loans on interbank liquidity risk in China: A cash flow network-based analysis. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 89, 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2023.03.005.
Ma, Z., Tian, Y., & See, K.F. (2024). The driving force behind the growth of China's green economic efficiency: Provincial efficiency influence analysis for a sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 460, 142205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142205.
Markowitz, H.M. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7 (1), 71-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x.
Novellyni, D., & Ulpah, M. (2017). Non-performing loans, moral hazard and lending behaviour of Indonesian Banks. International Journal of Economics & Management, 11 (2), 365-378.
Ozili, P.K. (2025). Reflecting on the Recent Banking Crisis, What Are the New Financial Stability Determinants? Economic Notes, 54(2), e70014. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.70014
Rehman, A., Ullah, I., Afridi, F. E. A., Ullah, Z., Zeeshan, M., Hussain, A., & Rahman, H. U. (2021). Adoption of green banking practices and environmental performance in Pakistan: A demonstration of structural equation modelling. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(9), 13200–13220.
Saravade, V., & Weber, O. (2020). An Institutional Pressure and Adaptive Capacity Framework for Green Bonds: Insights from India’s Emerging Green Bond Market. World, 1(3), 239-263. https://doi.org/10.3390/world1030018
Sharpe, W.F. (1978). New evidence on the capital asset pricing model: Discussion. The Journal of Finance, 33 (3), 917-920. https://doi.org/10.2307/2326488.
Song, J., Cao, W., & Shan, Y.G. (2025). Green credit and banks’ risk-taking: evidence from China. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 21 (1), 157-184. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-03-2024-0144
Su, D., Xu, S., & Tong, Z. (2023). Credit availability and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China’s green credit policy. Post-Communist Economies, 35 (3), 236-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2023.2169516.
Sun, H., & Yao, S. (2021). Operating risks and financial performance of commercial banks: from the perspective of green business impact. Finance Forum, 26 (2), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.16529/j.cnki.11-4613/f.2021.02.006.
Tian, H., Cui, Y., & Dong, J. (2024). Research on policy instruments for promoting green lifestyle in China—a multi-dimensional analysis based on current policy texts. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1405537. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1405537.
Wang, H., Cao, W., & Wang, Y. (2022a). Green finance policy and risk-taking among commercial banks: mechanism, characteristics, and empirical research. Financial Economics Research, 37 (4), 143-160.
Wang, K.H., Zhao, Y.X., Jiang, C.F., & Li, Z.Z. (2022b). Does green finance inspire sustainable development? Evidence from a global perspective. Economic Analysis and Policy, 75, 412-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.06.002.
Wang, X., & Wang, F. (2021). The impact of green credit on risk taking of commercial banks. Journal of Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, 33 (2), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.13230/j.cnki.jrsh.2021.02.001.
Wang, Y., Liu, F., Sun, L., Jia, Y., Yang, P., Guo, D., et al. (2023). Association between human blood metabolome and the risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research, 25 (1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01609-4.
Xing, C., Zhang, Y., & Tripe, D. (2021). Green credit policy and corporate access to bank loans in China: The role of environmental disclosure and green innovation. International Review of Financial Analysis, 77, 101838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101838.
Yasmin, S., & Akhter, I. (2021). Determinants of green credit and its influence on bank performance in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 25 (2), 31-41.
Zhang, D., Cai, J., Dickinson, D.G., & Kutan, A.M. (2016). Non-performing loans, moral hazard and regulation of the Chinese commercial banking system. Journal of Banking & Finance, 63, 48-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.11.010.
Zhang, S., Wu, Z., He, Y., & Hao, Y. (2022). How does the green credit policy affect the technological innovation of enterprises? Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 113, 106236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106236.
Zhang, X. (2023). The Influence of green credit on the risk taking of commercial banks, in: Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Information Management and Management Science: Association for Computing Machinery, 296-300.
Zhang, Y. (2019). The study on the heterogeneous impact of green credit on the credit risk of commercial banks. Master thesis, Henan University of Economics and Law.
Zhang, Z., & Ma, Y. (2023). Digital finance and corporate investment: A perspective of bank risk-taking. Modern Economic Science, 45 (1), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.20069/j.cnki.DJKX.202301005.
Zhou, X.Y., Caldecott, B., Hoepner, A.G.F., & Wang, Y. (2022). Bank green lending and credit risk: An empirical analysis of China's Green Credit Policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31 (4), 1623-1640. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2973.
Wu, Y., & Yatim, P. (2026). Impact of Green Credit Policies on Risk-Taking Behaviors in China’s Systemically Important and Non-Systemically Important Banks. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 16(1), 482-504.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode