ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
This study evaluates the effectiveness of the McodE pedagogical module, a project-based learning approach, in enhancing computational thinking (CT) skills among STEM secondary school teachers through the integration of the Magnetcode application. Employing a case study design, 21 teachers participated in a virtual workshop that introduced the module, focusing on developing solar still projects as a platform for integrating STEM concepts and CT skills. The workshop emphasized ubiquitous learning environments and provided hands-on training with supplementary resources to support classroom application. Teachers applied the module in their classrooms, culminating in student project showcases that fostered creativity, problem-solving, and innovation. Data were collected through post-test questionnaires and observations of project showcases, and findings highlighted the module's success in integrating CT skills within STEM education. Teachers rated highly on the module’s clarity, usability, and relevance to real-world issues like global warming and water scarcity. The Magnetcode application supported coding integration, though technical aspects received slightly lower ratings, indicating areas for improvement. Overall, the study concludes that the McodE pedagogical module effectively enhances CT skills while fostering engagement and creativity in STEM learning environments.
Adley, M., Alderson, H., Jackson, K., McGovern, W., Spencer, L., Addison, M., & O’Donnell, A. (2024). Ethical and practical considerations for including marginalised groups in quantitative survey research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 27(5), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2023.2228600
Anistyasari, Y., Eka Putra, R., & Febry Kurniawan, I. (2018). Assessing Computational Thinking using Pseudocode Programming Instrument.
Arain, M., Campbell, M. J., Cooper, C. L., & Lancaster, G. A. (2010). What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(June 2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-67
Barak, M. (2020). Problem-, Project- and Design-Based Learning: Their Relationship to Teaching Science, Technology and Engineering in School. Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2), 94–97. https://doi.org/10.24313/jpbl.2020.00227
Bojer, B. (2019). Unlocking Learning Spaces-An Examination of the Relationship between the Design of Learning Spaces and Pedagogical Practices (Issue December 2019) [Rune Fjord Studio & The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts.]. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30247.70562/1
Bunyamin, M. A. H., & Finley, F. N. (2016). STEM Education in Malaysia: Reviewing the Current Physics Curriculum. International Conference of Association for Science Teacher Education (ASTE), 1–15. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9439-5. 39.
Chistyakov, A. A., Zhdanov, S. P., Avdeeva, E. L., Dyadichenko, E. A., Kunitsyna, M. L., & Yagudina, R. I. (2023). Exploring the characteristics and effectiveness of project-based learning for science and STEAM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/13128
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th edition). Taylor & Francis.
Garner, S. (2006). The Development, Use and Evaluation of a Program Design Tool in the Learning and Teaching of Software Development. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 3, 1–8.
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2017). Computational Thinking: A Competency Whose Time Has Come. In Computational Thinking: A Competency Whose Time has Come (pp. 19–38). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350057142.ch-003
Hsieh, M. C., Pan, H. C., Hsieh, S. W., Hsu, M. J., & Chou, S. W. (2022). Teaching the Concept of Computational Thinking: A STEM-Based Program With Tangible Robots on Project-Based Learning Courses. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.828568
Janaka, N., Cai, R., Ram, A., Zhu, L., Zhao, S., & Qi Yong, K. (2024). PilotAR: Streamlining Pilot Studies with OHMDs from Concept to Insight. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1145/3678576
Karatrantou, A., & Panagiotakopoulos, C. (2008). Algorithm, Pseudo-Code and Lego Mindstorms Programming. Proceeding of SIMPAR , 70–79.
Kayan-Fadlelmula, F., Sellami, A., Abdelkader, N., & Umer, S. (2022). A systematic review of STEM education research in the GCC countries: trends, gaps and barriers. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00319-7
Kerr, J. N. Q., Hess, D. J., Smith, C. M., & Hadfield, M. G. (2018). Recognizing and reducing barriers to science and math education and STEM careers for native hawaiians and pacific islanders. CBE Life Sciences Education, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-06-0091
Malik, K. M., & Zhu, M. (2023). Do project-based learning, hands-on activities, and flipped teaching enhance student’s learning of introductory theoretical computing classes? Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 3581–3604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11350-8
Ministry of Education, M. (2017). RBT Secondary Schools Standard Curriculum. http://bpk.moe.gov.my/index.php/terbitan-bpk/kurikulum-sekolah-menengah/category/85-dskp-tingkatan-3?download=2069:dskp-kssm-reka-bentuk-dan-teknologi-tingkatan-3
Nita, S., & Kartikawati, S. (2020). Analysis of the Impact Narrative Algorithm Method, Pseudocode and Flowchart Towards Students Understanding of the Programming Algorithm Courses. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 835(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/835/1/012044
Rahmawati, S., Fauzi, A., & Supurwoko. (2024). Computational-Thinking Based Learning Activities for Physics in Indonesian New Curriculum Through a Student Worksheet Development. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF), 9(3), 426–437. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v9i3.4807
Natrah, A., & Shidki, M. Y. (2020). Conceptualisation of School Makerspace to Support Constructivism and Project-Based Learning in Public Schools in Malaysia. Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences, 21(1), 53–74.
Prasetiyo, W. H., Sumardjoko, B., Muhibbin, A., Naidu, N. B. M., & Muthali’in, A. (2023). Promoting Digital Citizenship among Student-Teachers: The Role of Project-Based Learning in Improving Appropriate Online Behaviors. Participatory Educational Research, 10(1), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.21.10.1
Rabiee, M., & Tjoa, A. M. (2017). From abstraction to implementation: Can computational thinking improve complex real-world problem solving? A computational thinking-based approach to the SDGs. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 504, 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7_10
Rui, T. J., Vengidason, S., Hanapi, Z., & Ma’arof, N. N. M. I. (2020). Academic World: How Do We Face The Challenges Of Fourth Industrial Revolution? Www.Europeanproceedings.Com, 431–439. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.03.03.51
Schoch, K. (2020). Case Study Research. In Selected Research Designs and Approaches (pp. 245–258). SAGE Publication.
Siang, H. M. (2020). DIY Automation Projects (Book 1) (Vol. 1). Bizchip Technology Centre.
Siang, H. M. (2022). DIY Automation projects (Book 2) (Vol. 2). Bizchip Technology Centre.
Siti Hamizah Aspin, Marlina Ali, & Muhammad Abd Hadi Bunyamin. (2022). STEM Education in Malaysia: A Review. Learning Science and Mathematics Journal, 17, 125–139. http://www.recsam.edu.my/sub_lsmjournalhttp://www.recsam.edu.my/sub_lsmjournal
Thissen, S. L. (2022). Computational Thinking: In-Service Elementary Teachers Developing Knowledge, Understanding, And Confidence. In Commons @ SPU Education Dissertations Education, School of Spring. https://digitalcommons.spu.edu/soe_etd/67
UNESCO. (2016). Incheon declaration and framework for action. Journal of American History, 94(1), 232–233.
UNESCO. (2018). Sustainable Development Goals?: Malaysia UNESCO Country Strategy 2018-2021.
Verma, R., Verma, S., & Abhishek, K. (2024). Research Methodology (1st ed.). Booksclinic Publishing.
Xiao, J., Sun-Lin, H. Z., Lin, T. H., Li, M., Pan, Z., & Cheng, H. C. (2020). What makes learners a good fit for hybrid learning? Learning competences as predictors of experience and satisfaction in hybrid learning space. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1203–1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12949
Jaya, S., & Zaharudin, R. (2024). Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Project-Based Learning Module (McodE) in Solar Still Projects. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4), 3020–3036.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode