Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

The Effectiveness of 6E Learning by Design™ Approach in Enhancing High School Physics Education on Students' STEM Literacy and Motivation towards STEM Fields

Shao Jikai, Khairul Azhar Jamaludin

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i4/23778

Open access

With the rapid advancement of the global economy and technology, the importance of STEM education has become increasingly prominent. However, many educational systems face challenges related to declining student interest and engagement in STEM fields. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of the 6E Learning byDeSIGN™ approach in enhancing students' STEM literacy and motivation in high school physics education, compared to traditional methods. A quasi-experimental design was employed with 100 high school students divided into an experimental group, taught using the 6E approach, and a control group, receiving traditional instruction. Pre- and post-tests assessed STEM literacy and motivation. Results indicated that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group, with notable increases from pre- to post-test within the experimental group. The findings provide empirical support for the integration of innovative instructional strategies in STEM education, offering practical implications for educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers.

Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). STEM vs. STEAM education and student creativity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(7), 331.
Ah-Nam, L., & Osman, K. (2018). Integrated STEM education: Promoting STEM literacy and 21st-century learning. Research Highlights in STEM Education, 66-80.
Ammar, M., Al-Thani, N. J., & Ahmad, Z. (2024). Role of pedagogical approaches in fostering innovation among K-12 students in STEM education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100839.
Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Mesutoglu, C., & Ocak, C. (2019). The impact of an out-of-school STEM education program on students' attitudes toward STEM and STEM careers. School Science and Mathematics, 119(4), 223-235.
Barry, D. M., & Kanematsu, H. (2016). STEM and ICT education in intelligent environments. Switzerland: Springer.
Bayanova, A. R., Orekhovskaya, N. A., Sokolova, N. L., Shaleeva, E. F., Knyazeva, S. A., & Budkevich, R. L. (2023). Exploring the role of motivation in STEM education: A systematic review. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(4), em2250.
Altan, E., & Tan, S. (2021). Concepts of creativity in design-based learning in STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(3), 503-529.
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21-32.
Burke, B. N. (2014). THE ITEEA 6E Learning byDeSIGN™ model. Technology & Engineering Teacher, 73(6).
Cabrera, L., Bae, C. L., & DeBusk-Lane, M. (2023). A mixed methods study of middle students' science motivation and engagement profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102281.
Chisom, O. N., Unachukwu, C. C., & Osawaru, B. (2023). STEM education advancements in Nigeria: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 5(10), 614-636.
Cohen, L. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). London: Routledge.
Çevik, M., & Bakioglu, B. (2022). The effect of STEM education integrated into teaching-learning approaches (SEITLA) on learning outcomes: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(2), 119-135.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Dotterer, A. M. (2022). Parent involvement, expectancy values, and STEM outcomes among underrepresented adolescents. Social Psychology of Education, 25(1), 113-127.
Dweck, C. S. (2016). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
Dyrberg, N. R., & Holmegaard, H. T. (2019). Motivational patterns in STEM education: A self-determination perspective on first-year courses. Research in Science & Technological Education, 37(1), 90-109.
Falloon, G., Hatzigianni, M., Bower, M., Forbes, A., & Stevenson, M. (2020). Understanding K-12 STEM education: A framework for developing STEM literacy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29, 369-385.
Garriott, P. O., Hudyma, A., Keene, C., & Santiago, D. (2015). Social cognitive predictors of first-and non-first-generation college students' academic and life satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 253-266.
Hsiao, H. S., Chen, J. C., Chen, J. H., Chien, Y. H., Chang, C. P., & Chung, G. H. (2023). A study on the effects of using gamification with the 6E model on high school students’ computer programming self-efficacy, IoT knowledge, hands-on skills, and behavioral patterns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(4), 1821-1849.
K?z?lay, E., Yamak, H., & Kavak, N. (2019). Motivation scale for STEM fields. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 7(14), 540-557.
Maknun, J. (2020). Implementation of guided inquiry learning model to improve understanding physics concepts and critical thinking skill of vocational high school students. International Education Studies, 13(6), 117-130.
Marchisio, M., Barana, A., Fioravera, M., Rabellino, S., & Conte, A. (2018). A model of formative automatic assessment and interactive feedback for STEM. In 2018 IEEE 42nd Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), Vol. 1, IEEE, 1016-1025.
Meng, N., Yang, Y., Zhou, X., & Dong, Y. (2022). STEM education in Mainland China. In Concepts and Practices of STEM Education in Asia, Springer Nature Singapore, 43-62.
Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices, Purdue University Press, 35-60.
Munna, A. S., & Kalam, M. A. (2021). Impact of active learning strategy on student engagement. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 4(2), 96-114.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Park, S. W. (2017). Motivation theories and instructional design. In Foundations of Learning and Instructional Design Technology.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813.
Qian, C., Ye, J. H., & Zheng, C. (2023). Integration of Shangshan culture into the STEAM curriculum and teaching: Results of an interview-based study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1251497.
Reiser, M., Binder, M., & Weitzel, H. (2024). Effects of design-based learning arrangements in cross-domain, integrated STEM lessons on the intrinsic motivation of lower secondary pupils. Education Sciences, 14(6), 607.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: The Guilford Press.
Sáinz, M., Fàbregues, S., Romano, M. J., & López, B. S. (2022). Interventions to increase young people's interest in STEM. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 954996.
Salikha, U. A., Sholihin, H., & Winarno, N. (2021). The influence of STEM project-based learning on students’ motivation in heat transfer learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012222. IOP Publishing.
Saritepeci, M., & Yildiz Durak, H. (2024). Effectiveness of artificial intelligence integration in design-based learning on design thinking mindset, creative and reflective thinking skills: An experimental study. Education and Information Technologies, 1-35.
Selcen Guzey, S., Harwell, M., Moreno, M., Peralta, Y., & Moore, T. J. (2017). The impact of design-based STEM integration curricula on student achievement in engineering, science, and mathematics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26, 207-222.
Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, 1-16.
Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., et al. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476-6483.
Trevissoi, M. C. (2024). Development of an innovative "hands-on physics" methodology for teaching physics at high school level.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Paris, France: Educational and Cultural Organization of the United Nations.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, B., & Li, P. ping. (2022). Digital creativity in STEM education: the impact of digital tools and pedagogical learning models on the students’ creative thinking skills development. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(6), 2633–2646.
Wang, J., Li, Q., & Luo, Y. (2022). Physics identity of Chinese students before and after Gaokao: The effect of high-stake testing. Research in Science Education, 52(2), 675-689.
Woldeamanuel, M., Gizaw, G. & [author not specified] (2019). Motivation and attitude towards learning chemistry. African Journal of Chemical Education, 9, 70-88.
Yang, Y., Fan, Y., Lu, H., Yuan, H., & Xie, L. (2020). New attempt of curriculum reform: A case study of physics STEAM curriculum in a senior high school. Research in Education, Assessment, and Learning, 6(1), 1-14.
Yaz?c?, Y. Y., Hac?o?lu, Y., & Sar?, U. (2023). Entrepreneurship, STEM attitude, and career interest development through 6E Learning byDeSIGN™ model-based STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(4), 1525-1545.
Zhang, Y. Y. (2021). Research on STEM literacy assessment for high school students. PhD dissertation, Nanjing Normal University.
Zhong, B., Liu, X., Zhan, Z., Ke, Q., & Wang, F. (2022). What should a Chinese top-level design in STEM education look like? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1-8.
Zhbanova, K. (2019). Developing creativity through STEM subjects integrated with the arts. Journal of STEM Arts, Crafts, and Constructions, 4(1), 1.

Jikai, S., & Jamaludin, K. A. (2024). The Effectiveness of 6E Learning by DesignTM Approach in Enhancing High School Physics Education on Students’ STEM Literacy and Motivation towards STEM Fields. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4), 1832–1844.