Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Science Students’ Misconceptions of Basic Concepts of Chemistry on Matter and Its Particulate Properties

Noor Saadah Binti Mohd Radzuan, Chuzairy Bin Hanri

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i4/23824

Open access

This paper aims to explore and discuss students’ misconceptions in explaining and representing matter and its particulate nature. The study was conducted quantitatively where data were obtained and analyzed through a two-level diagnostic test. Students' misconceptions are assessed based on objective answers in the first level. Then, in the second level, misconceptions are assessed based on open-ended questions that require students to construct a written descriptions as well as particle diagrams. Sixty secondary school students (age fourteen) participated in this study. Wilcoxon sign rank test analysis revealed that the median of the null hypothesis compared to each item median in diagnostic test have a significant difference of the diagnostic test at the significant level of 0.05. Based on the results, it turns out that each students have misconceptions on 100% of the items. Those misconception about basic chemical concepts are comprising both at the macroscopic and microscopic levels. Such misconceptions make it difficult for students to determine the exact facts and build explanations including representing particles that are coherent with the scientific facts between the observed phenomena and the phenomenon of particles. As a result, students face challenges in order to build conceptual understanding on the topic about matter and its particulate nature. The results of the study also enable appropriate learning methods to be developed specifically to overcome the misconceptions of basic chemical concepts in middle school.

Allen, M. (2019). Misconceptions in Primary Science (Third ed.). McGraw-hill education (UK).
Colclasure, B. C., Thoron, A. C., Osborne, E. W., Roberts, T. G., & Pringle, R. M. (2020). Comparing the 5E Method of Inquiry-based Instruction and the Four-Stage Model of Direct Instruction on Students' Content Knowledge Achievement in an ENR Curriculum. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(3), 1-21.
Cole, M., Wilhelm, J., Vaught, B. M.-M., Fish, C., & Fish, H. (2020). The Relationship between Spatial Ability and the Conservation of Matter in Middle School. Education Sciences, 11(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010004
De Andrade, V., Freire, S., & Baptista, M. (2019). Constructing Scientific Explanations: a System of Analysis for Students’ Explanations. Research in Science Education, 49(3), 787-807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9648-9
Elmas, R., Rusek, M., Lindell, A., Nieminen, P., Kasapo?lu, K., & Bílek, M. (2020). The intellectual demands of the intended chemistry curriculum in Czechia, Finland, and Turkey: a comparative analysis based on the revised Bloom's taxonomy. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(3), 839-851. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0rp00058b
Gkitzia, V., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2020). Students’ competence in translating between different types of chemical representations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 307-330.
Kirbulut, Z. D., & Geban, O. (2014). Using three-tier diagnostic test to assess students’ misconceptions of states of matter. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 509-521.
Klutse, B. (2021). College Students Conceptions of Particulate Nature of Matter and the Impact on Research Instrumentation. South Dakota State University.
Laliyo, L. A. R., Tangio, J. S., Sumintono, B., Jahja, M., & Panigoro, C. (2020). Analytic Approach of Response Pattern of Diagnostic Test Items in Evaluating Students' Conceptual Understanding of Characteristics of Particle of Matter. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(5), 824-841.
Lu, S., & Bi, H. (2016). Development of a measurement instrument to assess students' electrolyte conceptual understanding. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 1030-1040. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00137h
Mamombe, C., Mathabathe, K. C., & Gaigher, E. (2020). The influence of an inquiry-based approach on grade four learners' understanding of the particulate nature of matter in the gaseous phase: a case study.
Martinez, B. L., Sweeder, R. D., VandenPlas, J. R., & Herrington, D. G. (2021). Improving conceptual understanding of gas behavior through the use of screencasts and simulations. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1-13.
McLure, F., Won, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2022). Analysis of students’ diagrams explaining scientific phenomena. Research in Science Education, 52(4), 1225-1241.
Moon, A., Moeller, R., Gere, A. R., & Shultz, G. V. (2019). Application and testing of a framework for characterizing the quality of scientific reasoning in chemistry students' writing on ocean acidification. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(3), 484-494. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00005d
Nui?, I. (2018). Integration of Macroscopic and Submicroscopic Levels for Understanding Fundamental Chemical Concepts Using Web-Based Learning Material [PhD Thesis, University of Ljubljana].
Nui?, I., & Glažar, S. A. (2019). The Effect of e-Learning Strategy at Primary School Level on Understanding Structure and States of Matter. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/114483
Okumu?, S., & Doymu?, K. (2021). The Effect Of Seven Principles And Model-Supported Cooperative Learning On The Conceptual Understanding And Eliminating Misconceptions Of The Particulate Nature Of Matter. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(4), 53-71.
Pavlin, J., Glažar, S. A., Slapni?ar, M., & Devetak, I. (2019). The impact of students’ educational background, interest in learning, formal reasoning and visualisation abilities on gas context-based exercises achievements with submicro-animations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(3), 633-649.
Ryoo, K., Bedell, K., & Swearingen, A. (2018b). Promoting linguistically diverse students’ short-term and long-term understanding of chemical phenomena using visualizations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(6), 508-522.
Saat, R. M., Fadzil, H. M., Aziz, N., Haron, K., Rashid, K. A., & Shamsuar, N. R. (2016). Development of an online three-tier diagnostic test to assess pre-university students’ understanding of cellular respiration. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 532.
Slapni?ar, M., Tompa, V., Glažar, S. A., Devetak, I., & Pavlin, J. (2020). Students’ Achievements in Solving Authentic Tasks with 3D Dynamic Sub-Microscopic Animations About Specific States of Water and their Transition. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 67(3), 904-915. https://doi.org/10.17344/acsi.2020.5908
Su, K.-D. (2020). Enhancing Students’High-Order Cognitive Skills For Hierarchical Designs In Micro And Symbolic Particulate Nature Of Matter. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(5), 842-854.
Supasorn, S. (2015). Grade 12 students' conceptual understanding and mental models of galvanic cells before and after learning by using small-scale experiments in conjunction with a model kit. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 393-407. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00247d
Supasorn, S., & Amatatongchai, M. (2016). Development Of Conceptual Understanding Of Acid-Base By Using Inquiry Experiments In Conjunction With Particulate Animations For Grade 8 Students. TOJET.
Taber, K. S. (2018a). Representations and visualisation in teaching and learning chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 405-409.
Taber, K. S. (2019c). The nature of the chemical concept: Re-constructing chemical knowledge in teaching and learning (Vol. 3). Royal Society of Chemistry.
Üce, M., & Ceyhan, ?. (2019). Misconception in Chemistry Education and Practices to Eliminate Them: Literature Analysis. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(3), 202-208.
Yaseen, Z. (2018). Using student-generated animations: the challenge of dynamic chemical models in states of matter and the invisibility of the particles. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(4), 1166-1185. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00136g
Zarkadis, N., Stamovlasis, D., & Papageogiou, G. (2021). Studying the coherence of students? portrayed representations of the atomic structure-Connections with conceptions and misconceptions. Science Education International, 32(2), 164-171.

Radzuan, N. S. B. M., & Hanri, C. Bin. (2024). Science Students’ Misconceptions of Basic Concepts of Chemistry on Matter and Its Particulate Properties. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4), 2351–2360.