ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
This study aims to examine how well traditional Malaysian handicrafts are preserved through knowledge transfer, focusing on five crafts. The study looks at both knowledge to identify strengths, challenges and potential improvements in current training methods. A mixed methods approach was used to gather both quantitative and qualitative data. Various key indicators were used for evaluation, including the Knowledge Retention Rate (KRR) Learning Efficiency (LE) Knowledge Depth Index (KDI), Innovation Index (II) and Sustainability Index (SI). Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the quantitative assessment data to measure these metrics. Qualitative data was collected through interviews and observations to gain insights into the challenges faced by apprentices and master craftsmen. By combining both types of data analysis, a comprehensive understanding of how knowledge is passed down was achieved. The results showed that apprentices had a KRR of 80%, indicating that most of them effectively retained the skills and knowledge they were taught. The LE was found to be 105.26%, suggesting that apprentices acquired competence faster than expected. Overall, the findings highlighted a need for increased innovation in handicrafts. To uphold the varied legacy of Malaysia, addressing the obstacles identified and implementing tailored solutions are crucial in handicrafts. These discoveries provide insights for policymakers, educators and cultural organisations involved in safeguarding and championing traditional crafts. (215 words)
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Westview Press.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals (1st ed.). Longman Group.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone.
Gagné, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Othman, R., Ibrahim, O., Kamal, S. N. M., & Ahmad, M. (2023). Charting Digital Humanities: A Bibliometric View of Cultural Heritage. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2023.11.4
Wanniarachchi, T., Dissanayake, K., & Downs, C. (2020). Improving sustainability and encouraging innovation in traditional craft sectors: the case of the Sri Lankan handloom industry. Research Journal of Textile and Apparel, 24(2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/rjta-09-2019-0041
Yan, W., & Li, K. (2023). Sustainable cultural Innovation practice: heritage education in universities and creative inheritance of intangible cultural heritage craft. Sustainability, 15(2), 1194. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021194
Zhang, A., Olelewe, C. J., Orji, C. T., Ibezim, N. E., Sunday, N. H., Obichukwu, P. U., & Okanazu, O. O. (2020). Effects of innovative and traditional teaching methods on technical college students’ achievement in computer craft practices. SAGE Open, 10(4), 215824402098298. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020982986
Othman, R., Ibrahim, O., Kamal, S. N.-I. M., & Saári, H. (2024). Handicraft Heroes: Transferring the Knowledge Torch in Malaysian Crafts, Boh! International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4), 2394–2404.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode