ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
Vocational college is one of the leading institutions in coding and programming competencies among students. However, the lack of discussions on the stakeholders roles not treated in much detail and cause the limited information for intervention. This paper attempts to explores the integration of coding and programming competencies in Malaysian vocational education through the Quadruple Helix Model, which synergizes the collective efforts of government, industry, and academia. The investigation centres on the pivotal role of computational thinking within vocational training programs, emphasizing how enhanced computational thinking skills can significantly improve students' ability to address assigned programming tasks effectively. The Quadruple Helix framework supports this by facilitating a dynamic interaction among stakeholders, fostering an environment where academic concepts meet practical industry demands. The analysis suggests that embedding advanced coding skills in vocational education is key to preparing students for the technological challenges of the future job market. The outcome of this study indicates a pressing need for vocational training programs to adapt more robust programming training, which aligns well with industry requirements and academic standards, thus ensuring that graduates are well-prepared to contribute to Malaysia's digital economy. This approach not only benefits the immediate educational context but also positions Malaysian vocational education as a critical player in the global digital landscape. Further work is required to be more focus on many types of stakeholder to coding and programming competencies research in education.
Adorni, G., Piatti, A., Bumbacher, E., Negrini, L., Mondada, F., Assaf, D., Mangili, F., & Gambardella, L. (2024). A theoretical framework for the design and analysis of computational thinking problems in education. http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.19475
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2009.023374
Díaz-Lauzurica, B., & Moreno-Salinas, D. (2023). Applying Design Thinking to Enhance Programming Education in Vocational and Compulsory Secondary Schools. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312792
Dwivedi, R. K., Bisen, S., Yadav, M., Yadav, A., Dwivedi, R. K., Bisen, S., Yadav, M., & Yadav, A. (2024). Coding and Computational Thinking. In https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/979-8-3693-5370-7.ch002 (pp. 10–24). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5370-7.ch002
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix--University-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14–19.
Guo, Y. (2023). Vocational Education and Industry Integration and Symbiosis of Subjects and Digital Drivers. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1–19.
Harimurti, R., Ekohariadi, E., Munoto, M., Asto B, I. G. P., & Winanti, E. T. (2019). Analysis of Programming Skills Concept in Developing Problem Solving Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 25(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v25i1.22638
ISTE. (2021). ISTE Standards.
K?l?ç, S. (2022). Tendencies towards Computational Thinking: A Content Analysis Study. Participatory Educational Research, 9(5), 288–304.
https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.115.9.5
Korhonen, T., Salo, L., Laakso, N., Seitamaa, A., Sormunen, K., Kukkonen, M., & Forsström, H. (2023). Finnish teachers as adopters of educational innovation: perceptions of programming as a new part of the curriculum. Computer Science Education, 33(1), 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2022.2095595
Kumar, A. N. (2022). Solvelets: Tutors to Practice the Process of Programming. Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 1, 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1145/3502718.3524811
Kunwar, R. R. (2024). Extension of the Triple Helix to Quadruple to Quintuple Helix Model. 241–280.
Lai, R. P. Y., & Ellefson, M. R. (2023). How Multidimensional is Computational Thinking Competency? A Bi-Factor Model of the Computational Thinking Challenge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(2), 259–282.
https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221121052
Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? Journal of The Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4
Lodi, M., & Martini, S. (2021). Computational Thinking, Between Papert and Wing. Science and Education, 30(4), 883–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00202-5
MDEC. (2021). MDEC Celebrates Silver Jubilee – 25 Years of Driving Digital Transformation of Malaysia | MDEC. Malaysia Digital Economy Corporation Sdn Bhd, 2–3. https://mdec.my/news/mdec-celebrates-silver-jubilee-25-years-of-driving-digital-transformation-of-malaysia/
Northrup, A. K., Burrows, A. C., & Slater, T. F. (2022). Identifying Implementation Challenges for A New Computer Science Curriculum In Rural Western Regions of The United States. Problems Of Education in The 21st Century, 80(2), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/22.80.353 WE - Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
Parandekar, S., Patarakin, E., & Yayla, G. (2023). A Modern Aspect of Instrumental Literacy: Coding BT - Key Competences and New Literacies: From Slogans to School Reality (pp. 367–390). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23281-7_13
Park, Y., & Shin, Y. (2022). Text Processing Education Using a Block-Based Programming Language. IEEE Access, 10, 128484–128497.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3227765
Patel, H., Venkatesh, P., Sahni, S., Jain, V., Anand, M., & Singh, M. (2022). Program Synthesis: Does Feedback Help? CODS-COMAD 2022: 5th Joint International Conference on Data Science & Management of Data (9th ACM IKDD CODS and 27th COMAD), 310–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3493700.3493756
Pou, A. V, Canaleta, X., & Fonseca, D. (2022). Computational Thinking and Educational Robotics Integrated into Project-Based Learning. Sensors, 22(10).
https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103746
Resnick, M. (2018). Lifelong Kindergarten: Cultivating Creativity Through Projects, Passion, Peers and Play. MIT Press.
Schwartz, L., Maquil, V., Johannsen, L., Moll, C., & Hermen, J. (2024). Teaching computational thinking with a tangible development platform: An exploratory field study at school with Kniwwelino. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 4935–4967.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11983-3
UN DESA. (2023). SDGs Report 2023. In The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023: Special Edition (p. 80). United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/
Voon, X. P., Wong, S. L., Wong, L. H., Khambari, M. N. M., & Syed-Abdullah, S. I. S. (2022). Developing Computational Thinking Competencies through Constructivist Argumentation Learning: A Problem-Solving Perspective. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(6).
https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.6.1650
Wing, (2014). Computational thinking benefits society. Social Issues in Computing New York: Academic Press 40th Anniversary Blog.
http://socialissues.cs.toronto.edu/index.html%3Fp=279.html
Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
World Economic Forum. (2024). Putting Skills First Opportunities for Building Efficient and Equitable Labour Markets.
Wu, T.-T., Lin, C.-J., Wang, S.-C., & Huang, Y.-M. (2023). Tracking Visual Programming Language-Based Learning Progress for Computational Thinking Education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031983
Wu, T. T., Asmara, A., Huang, Y. M., & Permata Hapsari, I. (2024). Identification of Problem-Solving Techniques in Computational Thinking Studies: Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open, 14(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241249897
Zakaria, H., Kamarudin, D., Fauzi, M. A., & Wider, W. (2023). Mapping the helix model of innovation influence on education: A bibliometric review. Frontiers in Education, 8(March). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1142502
Zhang, W., Song, L., Huang, X., & Wang, Y. (2023). Construction and Practice of Computational Thinking Structural Framework with Sternberg’s Intellectual Education Theory. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers, 404–408.
Rosli, N. M., Matore, M. E. @ E. M., & Husnin, H. (2024). Synergizing the Integration of Coding and Programming Competencies through Quadruple Helix Model for Malaysian Vocational Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4), 3739–3747.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode