ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
Multiple intelligence has confronted condemnation due to the absence of empirical and neuroscientific provision with some dismissing it as a neuromyth. Critics inquire on its practicality and claim that it probably shares neural coherence, rather than being linked with distinct brain regions. Earlier studies on the claims are too old. Study goals to discover present research showed from 2019 to 2024 to offer a thoughtful of the theory, which has been criticized as a neuromyth by researchers especially in cognitive neuroscience. A thematic analysis identified ten (10) themes from five (5) selected articles by using VOS viewer software for constructing and visualizing bibliometric networks of studies which debating the theory as a neuromyth theory. These themes are lack of empirical evidence of brain studies, interconnectedness of intelligence, bridging theory with empirical evidence, neural correlating, quantitively unmeasured, marketable profit, less experiential and rigorous academical practice, neuroscience and education and the theory is not neuromyth. Study underlines the importance of a cooperative approach between education and neuroscience. Additional research is desired to discover how the theory could be reconciled with more well-known models of intelligence and brain function to be recognized as a valid scientific theory.
Aghanouri, R. (2024). Neurobiological definition of intelligence: A neuroscience review. Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal (BBRJ), 8(3), 261. https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_229_24
Amazon.com. (n.d.). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (Howard E. Gardner) [Book]. Retrieved April 11, 2025, from https://www.amazon.com/Frames-Mind-Theory-Multiple-Intelligences/dp/0465024335
Medical University of South Carolina. (n.d.). Inclusion/exclusion criteria - Systematic reviews - Guides. Retrieved April 11, 2025, from https://musc.libguides.com/systematicreviews/eligibilitycriteria
Asare, S., Amidu, A., Aning, E., Ampomah, T., Bediako, Y. A., Amuaful, E., & Baah, K. B. (2023). Impact of integrating information technology in teaching English in college of education: A systematic review. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v2i3.1840
Barbey, A. K., Koenigs, M., & Grafman, J. (2013). Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human working memory. Cortex, 49(5), 1195–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.022
Bruton, O. J. (2021). Is there a “g-neuron”? Establishing a systematic link between general intelligence (g) and the von Economo neuron. Intelligence, 89, 101540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2021.101540
Bramer, W. M., Rethlefsen, M. L., Kleijnen, J., & Franco, O. H. (2017). Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: A prospective exploratory study. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y
Brennan, E. (n.d.). Guides: Systematic reviews: Inclusion/exclusion criteria. Retrieved April 11, 2025, from https://musc.libguides.com/systematicreviews/eligibilitycriteria
Caulfield, J. (2019, September 6). How to do thematic analysis | Step-by-step guide & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/thematic-analysis
Shearer, C. B. (2019). A detailed neuroscientific framework for the multiple intelligences: Describing the neural components for specific skill units within each intelligence. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 11(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v11n3p1
Clement, N., & Lovat, T. (2012). Neuroscience and education: Issues and challenges for curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(4), 534–557. https://doi.org/10.2307/23324016
Contact, C. P. S. L. (2019, February 18). How to use Google Scholar. WUR. https://www.wur.nl/en/article/how-to-use-google-scholar.htm
Dawadi, S. (2020). Thematic analysis approach: A step-by-step guide for ELT research practitioners. Journal of NELTA, 25(1–2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v25i1-2.49731
Davis, K., Christodoulou, J., Seider, S., & Gardner, H. (2011). The theory of multiple intelligences. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 485–503). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977244.025
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Duncan, J., & Owen, A. M. (2000). Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends in Neurosciences, 23(10), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01633-7
Emily Jones, M. (n.d.). LibGuides: Systematic reviews: Step 8: Write the review. Retrieved April 11, 2025, from https://guides.lib.unc.edu/systematic-reviews/write
Ferrero, M., Vadillo, M. A., & León, S. P. (2021). A valid evaluation of the theory of multiple intelligences is not yet possible: Problems of methodological quality for intervention studies. Intelligence, 88, 101540.
Fell, C. (2001). Howard Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences and the implications for gifted education. [Graduate research paper].
Klein, P. D. (1997). Multiplying the problems of intelligence by eight: A critique of Gardner’s theory. Canadian Journal of Education, 22(4), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.2307/1585790
Davis, K., Christodoulou, J., Seider, S., & Gardner, H. (2011). The theory of multiple intelligences. In The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 485–503). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977244.025
Hammer, B., Virgili, E., & Bilotta, F. (2023). Evidence-based literature review: De-duplication a cornerstone for quality. World Journal of Methodology, 13(5), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v13.i5.390
Hoffmann, M. (2013). The human frontal lobes and frontal network systems: An evolutionary, clinical, and treatment perspective. ISRN Neurology, 2013, 892459. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/892459
Hosseini, M.-S., Jahanshahlou, F., Akbarzadeh, M., Zarei, M., & Vaez-Gharamaleki, Y. (2023). Formulating research questions for evidence-based studies. Journal of Medicine Surgery and Public Health, 100046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2023.100046
Eval Academy. (n.d.). Interpreting themes from qualitative data: Thematic analysis. Retrieved April 11, 2025, from https://www.evalacademy.com/articles/interpreting-themes-from-qualitative-data-thematic-analysis
Waterhouse, L. (2023). Why multiple intelligences theory is a neuromyth. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1217288
Mavrelos, M., & Daradoumis, T. (2020). Exploring multiple intelligence theory prospects as a vehicle for discovering the relationship of neuroeducation with imaginative/Waldorf pedagogy: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 10(11), 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110334
Mackintosh, N. (2011). IQ and human intelligence (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Morgan, H. (n.d.). Howard Gardner’s multiple intelligences theory and his ideas on promoting creativity.
Muhammad Naeem, Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
Allix, N. M. (2000). The theory of multiple intelligences: A case of missing cognitive matter. Australian Journal of Education, 44(3), 272–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410004400306
Öztürk, O., Kocaman, R., & Kanbach, D. K. (2024). How to design bibliometric research: An overview and a framework proposal. Review of Managerial Science, 18(11), 3333–3361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00738-0
Harzing, A. W. (n.d.). Publish or perish. Retrieved April 11, 2025, from https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish
Ploeg, P. van der. (n.d.). Multiple intelligences and pseudo-science. Retrieved April 11, 2025, from https://www.academia.edu/24174224/Multiple_Intelligences_and_pseudo_science
Rethlefsen, M. L., & Page, M. J. (2022). PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: Common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 110(2), 253–257. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1449
Ruhaak, A., & Cook, B. (2018). The prevalence of educational neuromyths among pre-service special education teachers. Mind, Brain and Education, 12(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12181
Rawson, M. (2020). A theory of Waldorf teacher education part 2: The role of study and artistic exercise.
Rousseau, L. (2021). “Neuromyths” and multiple intelligences (MI) theory: A comment on Gardner, 2020. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720706
Sohrabi, C., Franchi, T., Mathew, G., Kerwan, A., Nicola, M., Griffin, M., Agha, M., & Agha, R. (2021). PRISMA 2020 statement: What’s new and the importance of reporting guidelines. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105918
Semantic Scholar. (n.d.). Semantic Scholar academic graph API. Retrieved April 11, 2025, from https://www.semanticscholar.org/product/api
Shearer, B., & Karanian, J. (2017). The neuroscience of intelligence: Empirical support for the theory of multiple intelligences? Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 6(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2017.02.002
Setiawan, A., & Ilmiyah, S. (2020). Multiple intelligences based on neuroscience. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/e9fyu
Terada, Y. (2014). Multiple intelligences theory: Widely used, yet misunderstood. Edutopia. Retrieved April 11, 2025, from https://www.edutopia.org/article/multiple-intelligences-theory-widely-used-yet-misunderstood
ResearchGate. (n.d.). Thematic analysis, sub theme or subheading?. Retrieved April 11, 2025, from https://www.researchgate.net/post/Thematic_analysis_sub_theme_or_subheading
The BMJ. (n.d.). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Retrieved April 11, 2025, from https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n71
Trifu, A., Smîdu, E., Badea, D. O., Bulboac?, E., & Haralambie, V. (2022). Applying the PRISMA method for obtaining systematic reviews of occupational safety issues in literature search. MATEC Web of Conferences, 354, 00052. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202235400052
White, J. (n.d.). Howard Gardner: The myth of multiple intelligences.
Zakaria, S. K., & Hisham, N. A. B. (2025). Multiple Intelligence Theory is a Neuromyth? A Thematic Analysis Study. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(3), 1290–1305.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode