ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
This study investigates the assessment criteria applied in art and design education and their impact on student performance in higher education institutions across Jiangxi, China. The primary objective is to identify key issues, influential elements, and effective methods related to application- and practice-based assessment, while evaluating their implications for educational quality and student outcomes. The research explores how assessments are conducted in universities, focusing on the balance between theoretical evaluations and practical, creative performance—such as project submissions, portfolio reviews, and interactive critiques—commonly used in art and design disciplines. A descriptive quantitative research design was adopted, and data were collected through a structured survey involving 500 academic participants from four higher education institutions in Jiangxi. The sample was selected using a simple random sampling technique to ensure impartial representation across diverse academic backgrounds. The survey instrument was developed based on validated literature and pilot-tested for reliability, allowing comprehensive analysis of assessment practices. The findings reveal several critical insights: many institutions still rely on traditional assessment methods, which often fail to capture students’ creative potential and practical competencies. However, there is a growing shift towards integrated assessment approaches that emphasize originality, problem-solving, and student engagement. The data also indicate that while some institutions have begun adopting progressive assessment models, inconsistent standards and limited resources continue to hinder their effectiveness. This study is significant for policymakers, educators, and academic administrators as it provides empirical evidence supporting the need for reform in assessment practices within creative disciplines. By aligning assessment methods with the evolving nature of art and design education, institutions can better foster student development, critical thinking, and industry relevance in China’s higher education landscape.
Abdel Motaal, K. A., & El Deghaidy, P. (2023). A Proposed Curriculum Framework for A Bachelor’s Degree in Culinary Arts in Egypt. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology, 9(2), 193-223. https://jrciet.journals.ekb.eg/article_311225_ec9f113050b5b20b55872aa9c613293d.pdf
Abdigapbarova, U., & Zhiyenbayeva, N. (2023). Organization of student-centered learning 17within the professional training of a future teacher in a digital environment. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 647-661. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-022-11159-5
Abdollahi, A., Pradhan, B., Shukla, N., Chakraborty, S., & Alamri, A. (2020). Deep learning approaches applied to remote sensing datasets for road extraction: A state-of-the-art review. Remote Sensing, 12(9), 1444.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/9/1444
Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., ... & Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/pdf/S2405-8440(20)32155-1.pdf
Abu Khurma, O., Al Darayseh, A., & Alramamneh, Y. (2022). A Framework for Incorporating the “Learning How to Learn” Approach in Teaching STEM Education. Education Sciences, 13(1), 1. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/1/1/pdf
Abuhassna, H., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Kosnin, A. B. M., & Darwish, M. (2020). Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1-23. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z
Adachi, C., Tai, J. H. M., & Dawson, P. (2018). Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 294-306. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02602938.2017.1339775
Aggarwal, R., & Ranganathan, P. (2019). Study designs: Part 2–descriptive studies. Perspectives in clinical research, 10(1), 34. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371702/
Aithal, P. S., & Aithal, S. (2019). Analysis of higher education in Indian National education policy proposal 2019 and its implementation challenges. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 3(2), 1-35.https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3417517
Aithal, P. S., & Aithal, S. (2020). Promoting Faculty and Student Centered Research and Innovation based Excellence Model to Reimage Universities. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 5(1), 24-41.https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3580953
Akpoti, K., Kabo-bah, A. T., & Zwart, S. J. (2019). Agricultural land suitability analysis: State-of-the-art and outlooks for integration of climate change analysis. Agricultural systems, 173, 172-208.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X18300428
Al Hashimi, S., Al Muwali, A., Zaki, Y., & Mahdi, N. (2019). The effectiveness of social media and multimedia-based pedagogy in enhancing creativity among art, design, and digital media students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(21), 176-190.https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217207/
Alam, A. (2022). Contemplative Pedagogy: An Experiment with School Students for Demystifying the Philosophy of Contemplative Education. Resilience and Transformation in Global Restructuring, 289-300.https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5323522&publisher=FZP741#page=301
Alam, A., (2021), December. Should robots replace teachers? Mobilisation of AI and learning analytics in education. In 2021 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, and Control (ICAC3) (pp. 1-12). IEEE.
Bhamare, D. K., Rathod, M. K., & Banerjee, J. (2019). Passive cooling techniques for building and their applicability in different climatic zones—The state of art. Energy and Buildings, 198, 467-490.
Bhardwaj, P. (2019). Types of sampling in research. Journal of Primary Care Specialties, 5(3), 157-163. https://journals.lww.com/jopc/Fulltext/2019/05030/Types_of_Sampling_in_Research.6.aspx
Caeiro, S., Sandoval Hamón, L. A., Martins, R., & Bayas Aldaz, C. E. (2020). Sustainability assessment and benchmarking in higher education institutions—A critical reflection. Sustainability, 12(2), 543.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/543
Cai, X., Zhao, L., Bai, X., Yang, Z., Jiang, Y., Wang, P., & Huang, Z. (2022). Comprehensive Evaluation of Sustainable Development of Entrepreneurship Education in Chinese Universities Using Entropy–TOPSIS Method. Sustainability, 14(22), 14772.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14772
Campo, D. (2022). Female Education in a Chan Public Monastery in China: The Jiangxi Dajinshan Buddhist Academy for Nuns. Religions, 13(11), 1020. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/11/1020/pdf
Carless, D. (2022). From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 143-153.https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1469787420945845
Carrasco, J., García, S., Rueda, M.M., Das, S. and Herrera, F., 2020. Recent trends in the use of statistical tests for comparing swarm and evolutionary computing algorithms: Practical guidelines and a critical review. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 54, p.100665.https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.09227
Celik, B., Bilgin, R., & Yildiz, Y. (2022). An evaluation of positive and negative aspects of educational games: a case study in Erbil Brayaty Primary School. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 9(1), 227-243. http://eprints.tiu.edu.iq/933/1/ijsses.v9i1p227.pdf
Yixuan, L., & Hussain, Y. B. (2025). Reimagining Assessment in Creative Education: Application and Practice-Based Evaluation in Art and Design Colleges of Jiangxi, China. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(2), 1392–1406.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode