ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
China primary schools emphasis on STEM education, large disparities still exist in its implementation, notably between urban and rural educational institutions. This study indentify the correlation between the quality of STEM education and student engagement of primary school teachers in urban and rural areas. Using a correlational study design, the study collected data from 384 primary school teachers in Shandong, China through a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire prodbed into STEM education and measured student engagement on behavioral, emotional, and cognitive levels. Based on the results of the survey with (r = 0.719, p < .01), there was a very strong positive relationship between the quality of STEM education and student engagement. The regression results confirmed the quality of STEM education as a strong predictor of student engagement (R² = 0.614) while the school location also significantly explained the variation. Majorly, urban schools and not rural schools were the sources of higher scores for both the quality of STEM instruction and student engagement because of the following results. These effects further corroborate the previous findings that the key players in improving STEM experiences are the factors related to teaching. STEM education in China is still struggling with the gap between the myriad of challenges in different regions in realizing the full potential of STEM education, hence, the nation is nowhere near where they should aim to be. The need of the hour is an ever-increasing supply of capable and motivated professionals, well-versed in updated technology, in the realm of STEM. A more feasible scenario is generated in which learning is contextualized, student engagement, and, quite possibly, academic achievement will rise along with it. The conclusion underscores the significance of raising STEM education quality to ensure effective student engagement, especially in financially-weak rural areas. The research suggests policy options like the more extensive teacher training, fair resource allocation, and context-based curriculum change. They are the main elements of eliminating the urban-rural gap and realizing inclusive STEM education.
Attard, C., Holmes, K., & Way, J. (2021). Enhancing student engagement in STEM: The role of inquiry-based learning and industry partnerships. Australian Journal of Education, 65(2), 123–138.
Chang, Y., & Wang, H. (2024). Integrated English-STEM curricula and student participation: Impacts on rural education quality. Chinese Education & Society, 57(1), 41–59.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2023). Multivariate data analysis (9th ed.). Pearson.
Holmes, K., Way, J., & Attard, C. (2022). Contextualized STEM learning and student motivation in primary classrooms. STEM Education Review, 12(4), 255–270.
Jiang, L. (2024). Professional development and STEM teaching in rural China: Gaps and growth. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 52(1), 77–94.
Johnson, L., & Miller, A. (2024). Early interventions to sustain STEM interest in primary education. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 1–15.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.
Lechhab, A., Benabdelhadi, M., & El Khatir, M. (2023). ICT integration and STEM engagement in Moroccan primary schools. Journal of STEM Education in Developing Contexts, 5(2), 91–103.
Li, J., Zhang, Y., & Chen, W. (2023). Self-efficacy and task value in STEM: Predictors of behavioral engagement. Chinese Journal of Educational Psychology, 41(2), 134–148.
Murphy, C., Beggs, J., Carlisle, K., & Greenwood, J. (2019). The impact of assessment practices on science engagement. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 1–19.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
Ranosz, T., Kovács, M., & Gergely, Z. (2023). Game-based STEM learning in primary classrooms: Engagement and outcomes. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 34(1), 89–105.
Robinson, T. J., & Fenner, M. (2020). The STEMTIP tool: Evaluating teacher instructional preparedness. STEM Teacher Journal, 19(3), 22–35.
Smith, K., & Garcia, M. (2023). Gender disparities in STEM engagement: The role of classroom practices. International Review of Education, 69(1), 45–67.
Tiep, W. (2023). Teacher confidence and curriculum implementation in STEM primary education. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 12(3), 201–215.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C. D. (2023). STEM identity development and classroom engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 72, 102123.
Wang, J., & Degol, J. (2023). Psychometric tools for STEM motivation and engagement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 60(1), 3–21.
Wang, M., Li, X., & Zhang, L. (2023). Urban-rural disparities in STEM engagement: Evidence from China. Frontiers in Education, 8, 998012.
Way, J., Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2022). Scaffolding autonomy in STEM learning: A tri-level framework. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(2), 213–230.
Zhang, R. (2024). Teacher satisfaction and engagement in rural China: A mediating perspective. Asian Education Studies, 10(1), 65–81.
Zhou, L., & Lin, X. (2023). Shandong’s urban-rural divide in STEM infrastructure. China Education Studies, 6(2), 115–129.
Xiaodong, Q., Hashim, A. T. M. (2025). STEM Education Quality and Student Engagement in Urban-Rural Primary Schools in Shandong China. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(2), 1710–1721.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode