ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
Despite the theoretical alignment between the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework and blended EFL pedagogy, empirical research on how Chinese undergraduate EFL learners’ perceptions of teaching presence (TP), social presence (SP), cognitive presence (CP), and their specific subdimensions evolve within such contexts remains notably limited. To address this gap, the present study adopted a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design, beginning with a 6-week pilot phase to validate the cultural adaptability and reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Community of Inquiry Survey, while also testing the operability of the blended CoI (BCoI) intervention process. Following necessary adjustments to instruments and procedures based on pilot results, an 11-week BCoI intervention was implemented, involving 37 Chinese first-year STEM undergraduate EFL learners. Data were collected using the validated Chinese CoI Survey and analyzed through Wilcoxon paired-tests, with effect sizes calculated using Cohen's r. Results revealed significant medium-to-large improvements across all primary dimensions: TP (r = 0.49), SP (r = 0.56), and CP (r = 0.65). Among subdimensions, the most prominent effects were observed in TP’s Design & Organization (r = 0.50), SP’s Group Cohesion (r = 0.53), and CP’s Triggering Events (r = 0.68), with all CP subdimensions demonstrating large effect sizes. These findings indicate that the BCoI approach holds potential for enhancing students’ presence perceptions in EFL blended learning contexts, though the study is limited by the absence of a control group and a relatively small sample size.
Tabassum, Z., & Mohd Saad, M. R. (2024). Community of Inquiry as an Instructional Framework: How Teaching, Social and Cognitive Presences Impact EFL Speaking in a Blended Setting in Bangladesh. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, (10), 43–58.
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250.
Akyol, Zehra, Garrison, D. R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2009). Development of a community of inquiry in online and blended learning contexts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1834–1838.
Al Bataineh, K. B., Banikalef, A. A. A., & Albashtawi, A. H. (2019). The Effect of Blended Learning on EFL Students’ Grammar Performance and Attitudes: An Investigation of Moodle. Arab World English Journal, 10(1), 324–334.
Altay, I. F., & Altay, A. (2019). A sytematic review of studies on blended learning in EFL environment. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 11(1), 125–140.
Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136.
Aslan, S. A., & Turgut, Y. E. (2021). Effectiveness of community of inquiry based online course: Cognitive, social and teaching presence. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(3), 187–197.
Chen, R. H. (2022). Effects of Deliberate Practice on Blended Learning Sustainability: A Community of Inquiry Perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3), 1–15.
Cleveland-Innes, M. (2019). The community of inquiry theoretical framework: Designing collaborative online and blended learning. In Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age (3rd Edition, pp. 85–102). Routledge.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Cui, X., Qian, J., Garshasbi, S., Zhang, S., Sun, G., Wang, J., Shen, J., Yue, L. & Lyu, Y. (2024). Enhancing learning effectiveness in livestream teaching: Investigating the impact of teaching, social, and cognitive presences through a community of inquiry lens. STEM Education, 4(2), 82–105.
Ellis, R. A., Pardo, A., & Han, F. (2016). Quality in blended learning environments–Significant differences in how students approach learning collaborations. Computers & Education, 102, 90–102.
Field, A. (2017). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th Edition). London: SAGE.
Fiock, H. (2020). Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 135–153.
Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61–72.
Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (Third edition). New York: Routledge.
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 31–36.
Garrison, R. D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (pp. 3–21). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Pfeiffer.
Guo, P., Saab, N., Wu, L., & Admiraal, W. (2021). The Community of Inquiry perspective on students’ social presence, cognitive presence, and academic performance in online project?based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1479–1493.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Edition). New York: Pearson Education Limited.
Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner Engagement in Blended Learning Environments: A Conceptual Framework. Online Learning, 23(2), 145–178.
Hasanah, H., & Malik, M. N. (2020). Blended learning in improving students’ critical thinking and communication skills at University. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(5), 1295–1306.
Martin, F., Wu, T., Wan, L., & Xie, K. (2022). A Meta-Analysis on the Community of Inquiry Presences and Learning Outcomes in Online and Blended Learning Environments. Online Learning, 26(1), 325–359.
Moore, R. L., & Miller, C. N. (2022). Fostering Cognitive Presence in Online Courses: A Systematic Review (2008-2020). Online Learning, 26(1), 130–149.
Ng, D. T. K. (2022). What is the metaverse? Definitions, technologies and the community of inquiry. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 190–205.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill.
Rahim, M. N. (2019). The use of blended learning approach in EFL education. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5), 1165–1168.
Rolim, V., Ferreira, R., Lins, R. D., & G?sevi?, D. (2019). A network-based analytic approach to uncovering the relationship between social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 53–65.
Shea, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2022). Building bridges to advance the community of inquiry framework for online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 148–161.
Tabassum, Z., & Saad, M. (2024). A Decadal Examination of Community of Inquiry and Blended Learning in EFL/ESL Development: A Systematic Review. ARAB WORLD ENGLISH JOURNAL, 15(1), 401–422.
Vaughan, N. D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (2013). Teaching in Blended Learning Environments: Creating and Sustaining Communities of Inquiry. AU Press, Athabasca University: Athabasca University Press.
Vaughan, N. D., Dell, D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (2023). Principles of Blended Learning: Shared Metacognition and Communities of Inquiry. Athabasca University Press.
Waddington, A., & Porter, S. (2021). Developing social presence in online learning among nurses: Exploration of the community of inquiry models domain of social using a qualitative descriptive design. Nurse Education in Practice, 52, 103000.
Zhang, R. (2020). Exploring blended learning experiences through the community of inquiry framework. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 38–53.
Jia, X., & Zaid, N. M. (2025). Undergraduate EFL Students’ Blended Communities of Inquiry Learning Experience. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(3), 1095-1113.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode