ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
The integration of robotic technologies into rehabilitation settings represents a transformative phase in healthcare delivery, especially within the context of Malaysia’s Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) and its national “Health White Paper.” This organizational change underscores a strategic shift from traditional rehabilitation methods to technology-enhanced practices aimed at improving patient outcomes, particularly in stroke recovery. Robotic rehabilitation devices, such as exoskeletons and robotic gloves, enable intensive, repetitive, and task-specific therapies that are essential for restoring upper and lower limb functions. Their role becomes even more critical in addressing therapist shortages and accommodating rising patient demands, a challenge further intensified by the COVID-19 pandemic which highlighted the need for remote rehabilitation solutions. Drawing on Weiner’s (2009) Theory of Organizational Readiness for Change, this study explores the dual dimensions of change commitment and change efficacy as essential components for successful implementation. It discusses the technological, human, and organizational factors influencing the adoption of robotic technologies, including leadership support, resource availability, staff training, and user acceptance. Key barriers include resistance due to fear of depersonalized care and concerns over usability, especially in resource-limited settings. This paper emphasizes the importance of a supportive organizational culture, effective communication strategies, and continued workforce development to ensure sustainable integration. Additionally, it highlights the potential of robotic technologies to revolutionize rehabilitation by offering personalized and data-driven care, particularly through home-based and telerehabilitation platforms. Ultimately, the integration of robotic technologies aligns with Malaysia’s strategic healthcare goals, offering a scalable solution to enhance rehabilitation services and expand access. Future research and policy efforts should focus on cost-effectiveness, accessibility, and building collaborative ecosystems between stakeholders to maximize the transformative potential of these technologies in advancing national and global rehabilitation standards.
Ananda, H.-W., Ham, H., & Seelen. (2012). Embracing change: Practical and theoretical considerations for successful implementation of technology assisting upper limb training in stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 9(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-52
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Anette, G., Matérne, M., Lundqvist, L.-O., & Duberg, A. (2021). Navigating change - managers' experience of implementation processes in disability health care: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06570-6
Aprile, I., Pecchioli, C., Loreti, S., Cruciani, A., Padua, L., & Germanotta, M. (2019). Improving the efficiency of robot-mediated rehabilitation by using a new organizational model: An observational feasibility study in an Italian rehabilitation center. Applied Sciences, 9(24), 5357. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9245357
Beatrice, L., Braghin, F., Pedrocchi, A., & Gandolla, M. (2023). Technology acceptance model for exoskeletons for rehabilitation of the upper limbs from therapists’ perspectives. Sensors, 23(3), 1721. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031721
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
McAnaney, D., & Williams, B. (2010). Internalising disability management: Using action research to explore organisational change processes. Journal of Disability Management and Rehabilitation, 5(2), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1375/JDMR.5.2.32
Lee, G. (2022). Special issue on robotic-based technologies for rehabilitation and assistance. Applied Sciences, 12(16), 8022. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168022
Ministry of Health, Malaysia. (2023). Health white paper for Malaysia: Strengthening people’s health, future-proofing the nation’s health system.
Manjunatha, H., Pareek, S., Jujjavarapu, S. S., Ghobadi, M., Kesavadas, T., & Esfahani, E. T. (2021). Upper limb home-based robotic rehabilitation during COVID-19 outbreak. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8, 612834. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.612834
Laut, J., Porfiri, M., & Raghavan, P. (2016). The present and future of robotic technology in rehabilitation. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 4(4), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-016-0139-0
Johnson, C., Nguyen, M., Roth, G., Nichols, E., Alam, T., Abate, D., Abd-Allah, F., Abdelalim, A., Abraha, H., Abu-Rmeileh, N., Adebayo, O., Adeoye, A., Agarwal, G., Agrawal, S., Aichour, A., Aichour, I., Alahdab, F., Ali, R., & Murray, C. (2019). Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Neurology, 18, 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1
Pollack, J., & Pollack, R. (2015). Using Kotter’s eight stage process to manage an organisational change program: Presentation and practice. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-014-9317-0
Baloh, J., Zhu, X., & Ward, M. M. (2018). Implementing team huddles in small rural hospitals: How does the Kotter model of change apply? Journal of Nursing Management, 26(5), 571–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12584
Chua, K. S. G., & Kuah, C. W. K. (2017). Innovating with rehabilitation technology in the real world: Promises, potentials, and perspectives. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 96(10), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000799
Klein, K. J., & Knight, A. P. (2005). Innovation implementation: Overcoming the challenge. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00373.x
Lo, A. C., Guarino, P. D., Richards, L. G., Haselkorn, J. K., Wittenberg, G. F., Federman, D. G., Ringer, R. J., Wagner, T. H., Krebs, H. I., Volpe, B. T., Bever, C. T., Jr., Bravata, D. M., Duncan, P. W., Corn, B. H., Maffucci, A. D., Nadeau, S. E., Conroy, S. S., Powell, J. M., Huang, G. D., & Peduzzi, P. (2010). Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. The New England Journal of Medicine, 362(19), 1772–1783. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0911341
Klaic, M., Fong, J., Crocher, V., Davies, K., Brock, K., Sutton, E., Oetomo, D., Tan, Y., & Galea, M. P. (2022). Application of the extended technology acceptance model to explore clinician likelihood to use robotics in rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2060356
Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department. (2021). National Fourth Industrial Revolution Policy. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Author. ISBN 978-967-5842-29-0
Pollock, A., Farmer, S. E., Brady, M. C., Langhorne, P., Mead, G. E., Mehrholz, J., & van Wijck, F. (2014). Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014(11), CD010820. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010820.pub2
Izrinda, T., Bahari, M., Ismail, W., & Hanafi, M. H. (2018). Exploring barriers that affect telerehabilitation readiness: A case study of rehabilitation centre in Malaysia. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 761–771). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99007-1_70
Weiner, B. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness to change. Implementation Science, 4, 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-67
Khian, Y. C., & Mahadi, N. (2025). Organizational Change in Rehabilitation Settings: The Integration of Robotic Technologies. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(3), 1058–1065.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode