Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Implementing Printmaking in Junior High Schools under the New Curriculum: Practices, Challenges, and Pedagogical Responses

Sun Luan, Loy Chee Luen

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i3/26224

Open access

Printmaking, an integral part of Chinese traditional arts and crafts with a history spanning over a thousand years—from the woodblock prints of the Tang Dynasty to the iconic Yangliuqing New Year paintings—aligns with the new curriculum standards’ core goals: inheriting socialist advanced culture, revolutionary culture, and excellent traditional culture. Beyond cultural transmission, it fosters junior high school students’ observational skills, practical abilities, and creative thinking through hands-on processes like carving, inking, and printing. This study investigates printmaking instruction in junior high schools under the new curriculum, focusing on its educational significance, current practices, challenges, and improvements. Data from semi-structured interviews with 8 teachers and 15 students were thematically analyzed. Findings indicate that while printmaking holds rich educational value—enhancing concentration, cultural identity, and problem-solving—it faces implementation barriers: uneven resource allocation (e.g., dedicated studios vs. improvised materials), insufficient teacher training in specialized techniques (e.g.,woodcut), and time constraints limiting skill refinement. Recommendations to address these issues are proposed to enhance printmaking education effectiveness, ensuring it fulfills the new curriculum’s vision of holistic art education.

Abbasi Asl, R., Saadipour, I., & Asadzadeh, H. (2015). Comparison of the effectiveness of three methods of participatory learning on social skills of secondary school students. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations, 11(1), 105–124.
Banks, C. A. M., & Banks, J. A. (2001). Equity pedagogy: An essential component of multicultural education. Theory Into Practice, 34(3), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543674
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Blatter, J. (2008). Case study. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 69–71). SAGE Publications.
Chen, Y., & Liu, H. (2023). Resource disparities in art education: A comparative study of urban and rural schools in Jiangsu. Journal of Chinese Education, 18(1), 45–62.
Hu, Q. (2020). Core literacy and art curriculum in world primary and secondary schools (pp. 356–357). Shanghai Education Press.
Li, M. (2021). The impact of traditional printmaking education on middle school students’ cultural identity. Art Education Research, 42(3), 89–96.
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2022). Compulsory education art curriculum standards (2022 edition). Beijing Normal University Press.
Qian, C. (2022, October 15). Imagining the future: Redesigning the art curriculum [Conference presentation]. Academic Seminar on “Interpretation and Response to the New Art Curriculum Standards of Compulsory Education: Art Education on a New Journey”, Beijing, China.
Wang, K., & Liang, L. (2016). The innovation of the efficient teaching mode of printmaking in the art course of junior high school. China National Expo, (6), 63–64.
Zhang, Y. (2020). Printmaking as a tool for creative thinking: A case study of junior high school students. Creative Education, 11(5), 782–791.
Zhao, J. (2020). Professional development needs of rural art teachers in China. Education Policy Review, 15(2), 33–49.
Yin, S. (2022, October 15). From art course to arts curriculum [Conference presentation]. Academic Seminar on “Interpretation and Response to the New Art Curriculum Standards of Compulsory

Luan, S., & Luen, L. C. (2025). Implementing Printmaking in Junior High Schools under the New Curriculum: Practices, Challenges, and Pedagogical Responses. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(3), 1563–1570.